Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Freitag, 16. März 2012 schrieb Dietz Pröpper:
> > Benjamin Eikel:
> > > > I suspect something like that, but can't nail it down. The fact,
> > > > that if I fire up gnome, I see the "expected" consumption, around
> > > > 15W, and on a freshly created account, kde pulls arou
Am Samstag, 17. März 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Thus is you have plasma-desktop in the first place, I think this is
> not normal. Unless you do not run anything else at all in the moment.
> I think I will try with all user applications closed and look again.
So there we go - just two samp
Am Freitag, 16. März 2012 schrieb Dietz Pröpper:
> Benjamin Eikel:
> > > I suspect something like that, but can't nail it down. The fact,
> > > that if I fire up gnome, I see the "expected" consumption, around
> > > 15W, and on a freshly created account, kde pulls around 22W
> > > idleing around in
Benjamin Eikel:
> > I suspect something like that, but can't nail it down. The fact, that
> > if I fire up gnome, I see the "expected" consumption, around 15W, and
> > on a freshly created account, kde pulls around 22W idleing around
> > indicates that it's in some way kde related I think.
>
> hav
Hello Dietz,
Am Freitag, 16. März 2012, 10:53:46 schrieb Dietz Pröpper:
> Martin Steigerwald:
> > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Dietz Pröpper:
> > > Current kde from unstable is a bad idea for a laptop imho, because for
> > > some reason, plasma-desktop permanently pulls some % of cpu time,
>
Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Dietz Pröpper:
> > Current kde from unstable is a bad idea for a laptop imho, because for
> > some reason, plasma-desktop permanently pulls some % of cpu time,
> > therefore ruining battery life.
>
> It might do so on your machine(s).
Obvio
Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012 schrieb Modestas Vainius:
> Hello,
Hi Modestas,
> On 2012 m. of March 15 d., Thursday 12:42:17 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
> > > On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > > > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to us
Modestas Vainius
> FWIW, I was referring to kdepim 4.7, not *4.8*. In fact, we will probably
> upload kdepim 4.8.x together with KDE SC 4.8.x. But that's for future.
Let me clarify that there isn't any official plan wrt kdepim 4.7 nor 4.8, since
we didn't discussed it as a team (yet).
signatur
"Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda"
> A Dimarts 13 Març 2012, Sune Vuorela va escriure:
> > On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
> > > if you value your data.
> >
> > I officially disagree.
>
> I don't know if it's a crap or not, but how can I test i
Hello,
On 2012 m. of March 15 d., Thursday 12:42:17 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
> > On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
> > > if you value your data.
> >
> > I officially disagree.
>
> Hmmm. I
On 2012-03-15, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
>> On 2012-03-15, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
>> >> On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
>> >> > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
>> >>
Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
> On 2012-03-15, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
> >> On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> >> > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
> >> > if you value your data.
> >>
> >> I officially
Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012 schrieb Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda:
> A Dimarts 13 Març 2012, Sune Vuorela va escriure:
> > On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
> > > if you value your data.
> >
> > I officially disagree.
>
> I don't know if it's
On 2012-03-15, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
>> On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
>> > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
>> > if you value your data.
>>
>> I officially disagree.
>
> Hmmm. I never did test it.
on my laptop which run
A Dimarts 13 Març 2012, Sune Vuorela va escriure:
> On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
> > if you value your data.
>
> I officially disagree.
I don't know if it's a crap or not, but how can I test it with debian? What's
the problem with kdepi
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
> On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
> > if you value your data.
>
> I officially disagree.
Hmmm. I never did test it.
From what I read on kdepim and kdepim-users mailing lists there have been
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Dietz Pröpper:
> Johannes Graumann:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For my new laptop I'm tempted to go with kde 4.7 as now residing in
> > unstable. However, the lack of kdepim therein is a show stopper for
> > me. Do inofficial repositories exist to get kontact none the less?
Hi,
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 01:26:23 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On antradienis 13 Kovas 2012 12:23:46 Johannes Graumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For my new laptop I'm tempted to go with kde 4.7 as now residing in
> > unstable. However, the lack of kdepim therein is a show stopper for
Le Tuesday 13 March 2012 10:44:22, Dietz Pröpper a écrit :
> Johannes Graumann:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For my new laptop I'm tempted to go with kde 4.7 as now residing in
> > unstable. However, the lack of kdepim therein is a show stopper for me.
> > Do inofficial repositories exist to get kontact none t
On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
> if you value your data.
I officially disagree.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: h
Hello,
On antradienis 13 Kovas 2012 12:23:46 Johannes Graumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For my new laptop I'm tempted to go with kde 4.7 as now residing in
> unstable. However, the lack of kdepim therein is a show stopper for me. Do
> inofficial repositories exist to get kontact none the less? Are their
>
> Current kde from unstable is a bad idea for a laptop imho, because for some
> reason, plasma-desktop permanently pulls some % of cpu time, therefore
> ruining battery life.
>
> regards
> Dietz
> --
>
Dietz, I'm running KDE from unstable and I don't have that problem (I've
had kwin/xorg
Johannes Graumann:
> Hi,
>
> For my new laptop I'm tempted to go with kde 4.7 as now residing in
> unstable. However, the lack of kdepim therein is a show stopper for me.
> Do inofficial repositories exist to get kontact none the less? Are
> their other options?
Current kde from unstable is a bad
Hello Johannes,
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012, 11:23:46 schrieb Johannes Graumann:
> Hi,
>
> For my new laptop I'm tempted to go with kde 4.7 as now residing in
> unstable. However, the lack of kdepim therein is a show stopper for me. Do
> inofficial repositories exist to get kontact none the less?
Johannes Graumann
> Hi,
>
> For my new laptop I'm tempted to go with kde 4.7 as now residing in
> unstable. However, the lack of kdepim therein is a show stopper for me. Do
> inofficial repositories exist to get kontact none the less? Are their other
> options?
No.
>
> Thanks for any hints, Jo
Hi,
For my new laptop I'm tempted to go with kde 4.7 as now residing in
unstable. However, the lack of kdepim therein is a show stopper for me. Do
inofficial repositories exist to get kontact none the less? Are their other
options?
Thanks for any hints, Joh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
26 matches
Mail list logo
