Ben Burton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Your post was both offensive and
discriminatory (yes I know some gay people, and I find anti gay comments
vulgar and unneccessary).
Hmm? How was Russell's post offensive, discriminatory or anti-gay? He was
mistaken about your sexu
Hi everyone,
Good news. With a *HUGE* effort from Thomas Schoepf I have finally managed
to get kde 3.0.3 onto my PC. Thank you very much Thomas for your time,
effort, patience and advice. Very much appreciated. I don't know why I had
so much troubles getting it all to work, I rebuilt my debian
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:46, David Pashley wrote:
> On Monday 30 September 2002 8:00 pm, Fred K Ollinger wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I would like to point out we use a mailing list for a reason. Please stop
> CCing everyone who so much as touchs a thread.
Do you think that you are setting an example of how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 September 2002 8:00 pm, Fred K Ollinger wrote:
[snip]
I would like to point out we use a mailing list for a reason. Please stop
CCing everyone who so much as touchs a thread.
- --
David Pashley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nihil curo de ista tua
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:24, Fred K Ollinger wrote:
> I think that this was a lib problem that smart people fixed by downgrading
> in a rescue environment.
I strongly recommend installing busybox-static. init=/bin/busybox will let
you solve many problems.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My
> Also it should be noted that Debian/unstable is actually remarkably stable for
> the working tree of a large software development project. In terms of the
True. I do consider this a good thing. Most people will probably be OK if
they don't wear seatbelts, but that doesn't make driving w/o one a
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:03, Fred K Ollinger wrote:
> > The problem is that developers (I mean Debian Developers mostly)
> > actually use unstable for their work. Having unstable packages to work
> > with is ok for most packages, but when core things like XFree, gnome,
> > kde ... are *really* unstab
> The problem is that developers (I mean Debian Developers mostly)
> actually use unstable for their work. Having unstable packages to work
> with is ok for most packages, but when core things like XFree, gnome,
> kde ... are *really* unstable in unstable, people will get annoyed.
Then they have t
> mmm well...i shouldn't say this, but i'm going to say this...after an
> endless nightmare of trying to get woody stable to upgrade kde 2.2 to kde 3
> I give up. I've never used kde before (being a gnome man up until now) - I
Sorry.
> wanted to try kde and give it a fair go, but sorry. After a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 September 2002 02:32, David Pastern wrote:
> maxus:/home/maxus# apt-get dist-upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Calculating Upgrade... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> kab kde kd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 September 2002 03:28, Derek Gladding wrote:
>
> /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib
> non-free deb http://ht
måndagen den 30 september 2002 10.41 skrev David Pashley:
> http://people.debian.org/~willy/c++transition.html
When the non-beta version of KDE3 is ready with GCC3, you just put a conflict
with the beta version and everything is replaced with the new version. It
does not look like a problem. Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 29 September 2002 12:40 pm, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> söndagen den 29 september 2002 11.59 skrev David Pashley:
> > The current plan intents to append a c to the package name for 3.2
> > compiled packages. This can then go when the soname i
On Sunday 29 September 2002 07:17 pm, David Pastern wrote:
> Interestingly reading this post on this online forum:
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/history/27477
>
> The first persons response to the post in question is named Mara. He/she
> says;
>
> "Try to choose a different server f
#x27;m not sure if this is the case or not in my situation. Any light?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Pastern
To: Malcolm Hunter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pastern
Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 30/09/2002 12:05
Subject: RE: 178 days and counting
Malcolm,
I would prefer not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Your post was both offensive and
> discriminatory (yes I know some gay people, and I find anti gay comments
> vulgar and unneccessary).
Hmm? How was Russell's post offensive, discriminatory or anti-gay? He was
mistaken about your sexual orientat
ust very tired, very angry and
very frustrated and wanting some help to get it all running.
Dave
-----Original Message-
From: Malcolm Hunter
To: David Pastern
Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 30/09/2002 11:40
Subject: Re: 178 days and counting
David,
Install Red Hat, Mandrake or SuSE - i
t; and I can provide the said cdrom and let it read it and do its work. After
> my previous troubles i'm just very nervous and hesitant and untrusting of
> it all.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Pastern
> To: Thomas Schoepf; [EMAIL P
kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 30/09/2002 11:17
Subject: RE: 178 days and counting
Ignore post - I just tried removing the stable main and it's working
now.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Pastern
To: Thomas Schoepf; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pastern
Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.o
Ignore post - I just tried removing the stable main and it's working now.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Pastern
To: Thomas Schoepf; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pastern
Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 30/09/2002 11:14
Subject: RE: 178 days and counting
mm well as
ople.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/woody ./ main
and that didn't work either.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schoepf
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pastern
Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 27/09/2002 5:38
Subject: Re: 178 days and counting
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:36:16PM -04
I lost my cool and vented my anger and
frustration on you, and I shouldn't have. My apologies to those that I did
offend (yes i've cooled down now).
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Pastern
To: Russell Coker; David Pastern
Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 30/09/2002 9
ooo nasty - go fuck yourself
-Original Message-
From: Russell Coker
To: David Pastern
Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 29/09/2002 19:18
Subject: Re: 178 days and counting
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 01:34, David Pastern wrote:
> eh? Thanks, but no thanks. I'm running on a
söndagen den 29 september 2002 11.59 skrev David Pashley:
> The current plan intents to append a c to the package name for 3.2 compiled
> packages. This can then go when the soname is upped. So if we put KDE in
> now, we are stuck with kdelibs4c until kde4 is released.
How will you do with incomp
> Many people have 10 or more years IT experience where it's just the same
> year repeated many times, I fear that your husband(*) might be one of them.
Please don't insult any sexual minorities by comparing them to mr. Troll.
There are quite a few non-hetero Linux and KDE hackers, FYI.
- Jarno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 27 September 2002 7:01 pm, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 19:36 schrieb
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > woody/unstable (libc3.x maybe? I don't remember.) that were
> > dependencies.
>
> Because you wrote that often enough
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 01:34, David Pastern wrote:
> eh? Thanks, but no thanks. I'm running on a Class C internal network
> where I live, with a direct backend into the ms exchange server (yes the
> gentleman where I live runs his own ISP, Microsoft based without a single
> touch of linux as he thi
On Saturday 28 September 2002 04:34 pm, David Pastern wrote:
> eh? Thanks, but no thanks. I'm running on a Class C internal network
> where I live, with a direct backend into the ms exchange server (yes the
> gentleman where I live runs his own ISP, Microsoft based without a single
> touch of li
7;ll try to help you get set up.
Otherwise stop flaming the list please, it gets you nowhere and wastes our
time.
Regards,
Dustin Melancon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Slatford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 7:35 PM
Subject:
Thomas Schoepf wrote:
Let me summarize:
1. you put the wrong line into sources.list
2. 8 hours of trial & error but you couldn't figure that out
3. you blame it all on kde
4. although you said that you "want nothing to do with kde" you keep
posting on debian-kde
5. you were pointed to the correc
> An average peace of butter would be sensible enough to unsubscribe.
Make that "piece".
--
The days just prior to marriage are like a snappy introduction to a
tedious book.
> eh? Thanks, but no thanks. I'm running on a Class C internal network
> where I live, with a direct backend into the ms exchange server (yes the
> gentleman where I live runs his own ISP, Microsoft based without a single
> touch of linux as he thinks it's a pile of shit and a fad - oh and he do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 29 September 2002 00:26, David Pastern wrote:
> ahhh a smart ass eh? wtf is debian-kde@lists.debian.org then? Santa
> claus? I'm sure IQs are dropping...
[snip]
> *you betchya i'm totally *ucking pissed off*
>
> BTW I have totally removed
David Pastern said:
> I'm beyond caring now.
That's OK, so are we...
--kurt
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 09:26:02AM +1000, David Pastern wrote:
> ahhh a smart ass eh? wtf is debian-kde@lists.debian.org then? Santa claus?
> I'm sure IQs are dropping...
Let me summarize:
1. you put the wrong line into sources.list
2. 8 hours of trial & error but you couldn't figure that out
3
Hendrik Sattler
To: David Pastern
Sent: 28/09/2002 0:26
Subject: Re: 178 days and counting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 28. September 2002 14:32 schrieb David Pastern:
[...]
I know this is not your fault but your current mailer (Internet Mail
Service
(5.5.2653.19
debian-kde@lists.debian.org; David Pastern
Sent: 28/09/2002 3:50
Subject: Re: 178 days and counting
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 22:24:41 +1000
David Pastern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want nothing to do
> with kde.
So it's the wrong list.
Alain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 22:24:41 +1000
David Pastern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want nothing to do
> with kde.
So it's the wrong list.
Alain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> [ On Saturday 28 September 2002 08:35 am, John Gay wrote: ]
> [...] The current versions of KDE3 are 'unstable' and the
> various versions are compiled against a variety of mixed
> stable/testing/unstable systems. [...]
shouldn't we call th
On Sat 28 Sep 2002 13:24, David Pastern wrote:
> thanks (i'm sure i'm going to get flamed for this but I don't care one
> iota).
I'm sorry your experience with KDE was not optimal, but blaming KDE alone is
an incorrect assumption.
The problems you've encountered are due to a large number of in
Em Sat, 28 Sep 2002 22:32:46 +1000
David Pastern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
[ cut ]
> debian, it's fantastic. I'm also happy with dselect and apt. It's kde.
no , it's you. I have kde 3 runnig on my testing box and it works
just fine.
--
Home Page -> http://sites.uol.com.br/rafaelsch/
[E
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 20:01, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> BTW: I don't understand why most unstable packages are not in unstable
> anymore. KDE3.x ist left out because of gcc3.2, although it does not make
> much sense: if it breaks on transistion to gcc3.2- well, it's unstable. Same
> with XFree4.2
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 19:58, scooter wrote:
> what happens on a Debian system when you compile from source? I have run in
> succession 3.0 alpha, 3.0beta, 3.1 alpha and now 3.1beta (or for you purests
> 3.0.7) All built from tarballs on the dread RH. I have never had the
> slightest difficulty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 28 September 2002 13:32, David Pastern wrote:
> further to my last email: for those that will bitch about it - this is how
> I setup my /etc/apt/sources.list config file:
[snip]
> deb http://people.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/woody/ testing
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Pastern
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Michael Knigge; David Pastern
Cc: David Pashley; debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 28/09/2002 22:24
Subject: RE: 178 days and counting
mmm well...i shouldn't say this, but i'm going to say this...after an
end
astern
Cc: David Pashley; debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Sent: 27/09/2002 3:36
Subject: Re: 178 days and counting
Michael Knigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've now reinstalled woody/stable and have only stable in
> sources.list. I'd
>> love to install kde3.x if s
Simon Hepburn wrote:
> As for the line wrap it's set to 78, always has been. Looks like a bug in
> kmail when moving mails to or from the drafts folder. I'll try and
> reproduce it. Anyone else seen anything similar ? Nothing on the kde bug
> page.
Reproduced and reported as #48392
--
Simon Hepb
Brad Felmey wrote:
> Simon, don't even pretend you understand what I was getting at. It's
> painfully obvious you don't.
Given that your posts consisted of:
>Since KDE 3.0 was released, and still nothing in sid.
and
>I'd rather just bitch about it, thanks.
... what is it that we are supposed
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:36:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > deb http://people.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/woody ./
> It appears to be what I want. That looks like what I did, though, and there
> were still libraries that were required and only available from woody/unstable
Use the deb so
On Friday 27 September 2002 21:02, Brad Felmey wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:14, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> > Brad Felmey wrote:
> > > I'd rather just bitch about it, thanks.
> >
> > That's odd I'm running sid and kde3.0.3. How did that happen ?
> > Guess I must have pasted one of those pesky a
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:14, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> Brad Felmey wrote:
>
> > I'd rather just bitch about it, thanks.
>
> That's odd I'm running sid and kde3.0.3. How did that happen ?
> Guess I must have pasted one of those pesky apt-lines for ftp.kde.org
> that people keep littering this li
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:25:40 -0500
Brad Felmey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 11:14, David Pashley wrote:
>
> > Well you could join #debian-kde on irc.freenode.org, check out KDE
> > from CVS and fix problems. Whie you're at it you could sort out a
> > correct transition t
Brad Felmey wrote:
> I'd rather just bitch about it, thanks.
That's odd I'm running sid and kde3.0.3. How did that happen ? Guess I must
have pasted one of those pesky apt-lines for ftp.kde.org that people keep
littering this list with, into my sources.list. Mind you that's an awful lot of
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 19:36 schrieb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>> woody/unstable (libc3.x maybe? I don't remember.) that were dependencies.
>
> Because you wrote that often enought now:
> "woody" is not "unstable" or "testing" but the current "
ROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:33 PM
> To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: 178 days and counting
>
> On Friday 27 September 2002 18:25, Brad Felmey wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 11:14, David Pashley wrote:
> > > Well you could join #debian-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 19:36 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> woody/unstable (libc3.x maybe? I don't remember.) that were dependencies.
Because you wrote that often enought now:
"woody" is not "unstable" or "testing" but the current "stable",
what happens on a Debian system when you compile from source? I have run in
succession 3.0 alpha, 3.0beta, 3.1 alpha and now 3.1beta (or for you purests
3.0.7) All built from tarballs on the dread RH. I have never had the slightest
difficulty with KDE on RH unless it was something of my own doi
n-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 178 days and counting
On Friday 27 September 2002 18:25, Brad Felmey wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 11:14, David Pashley wrote:
> > Well you could join #debian-kde on irc.freenode.org, check out KDE
from
> > CVS and fix problems. Whie you're a
Michael Knigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've now reinstalled woody/stable and have only stable in
> sources.list. I'd
>> love to install kde3.x if someone can point me to a .deb that will
> install it
>> on standard woody/stable. Anyone?
>
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/w
On Friday 27 September 2002 18:25, Brad Felmey wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 11:14, David Pashley wrote:
> > Well you could join #debian-kde on irc.freenode.org, check out KDE from
> > CVS and fix problems. Whie you're at it you could sort out a correct
> > transition to GCC 3.2 in sid without bre
> I've now reinstalled woody/stable and have only stable in
sources.list. I'd
> love to install kde3.x if someone can point me to a .deb that will
install it
> on standard woody/stable. Anyone?
deb http://people.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/woody ./
apt-get update
apt-get install kdebase
apt-get
I haven't tired it but there was some discussion on the list a few weeks
ago and someone made kde3 for woody
deb http://people.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/woody ./
I am running kde3 on testing though with no real troubles to speak of.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 27 September 2002 2:48 pm, Brad Felmey wrote:
>> Since KDE 3.0 was released, and still nothing in sid.
>
> Well you could join #debian-kde on irc.freenode.org, check out KDE from CVS
> and fix problems. Whie you're at it you could sort out a c
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 11:14, David Pashley wrote:
> Well you could join #debian-kde on irc.freenode.org, check out KDE from CVS
> and fix problems. Whie you're at it you could sort out a correct transition
> to GCC 3.2 in sid without breaking updates including from woody, or you could
> just bi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 27 September 2002 2:48 pm, Brad Felmey wrote:
> Since KDE 3.0 was released, and still nothing in sid.
> --
> Brad Felmey
Well you could join #debian-kde on irc.freenode.org, check out KDE from CVS
and fix problems. Whie you're at it you cou
65 matches
Mail list logo
