Re: Re: Re: Qt (>= Qt 3.1.0) (library qt-mt) not found.

2003-06-23 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 23.Jun 2003 - 14:48:20, Lukasz Lesniak wrote: > I have Qt 3.2.0b1 installed and compiled from source. > The instruction for instalation this version of Qt suggest > QTDIR=/usr/local/qt > and I have this path to my new Qt. > > I red some suggestions from net about Qt and I try > also ./configu

Re: Re: Re: Qt (>= Qt 3.1.0) (library qt-mt) not found.

2003-06-23 Thread Lukasz Lesniak
I have Qt 3.2.0b1 installed and compiled from source. The instruction for instalation this version of Qt suggest QTDIR=/usr/local/qt and I have this path to my new Qt. I red some suggestions from net about Qt and I try also ./configure --with-qt-dir=/usr/local/qt because I have there Qt. The sa

Re: Re: Qt (>= Qt 3.1.0) (library qt-mt) not found.

2003-06-23 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 23.Jun 2003 - 13:00:38, Lukasz Lesniak wrote: > Yes, I set QTDIR correctly and sucessfully compiled Qt. > > I think there isn't good idea to install libqt3 with apt-get, > because libqt3 has version 3.0.3 and will be make problem. No there isn't and I did not say to do so, but I wanted to kno

Re: Re: Qt (>= Qt 3.1.0) (library qt-mt) not found.

2003-06-23 Thread Lukasz Lesniak
Yes, I set QTDIR correctly and sucessfully compiled Qt. I think there isn't good idea to install libqt3 with apt-get, because libqt3 has version 3.0.3 and will be make problem. I still don't understand why should/must install libqt, so i compile and install new version of it? dpkg -l | grep qt