Re: To: John Gay

On Thursday 31 May 2001 04:02, Scott E. Graves wrote: > First of all, 90% of the time woody is broken. If it's a > leading-edge dist you're looking for, use sid. Your system coulkd > be rendered useless ussing the woody tree. But woody is sid + a couple of of (critical?) bug-free days. Woody sho

Re: To: John Gay

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 30 May 2001 9:02 pm, Scott E. Graves wrote: > First of all, 90% of the time woody is broken. If it's a leading-edge > dist you're looking for, use sid. Your system coulkd be rendered useless > ussing the woody tree. Huh? I've had two sys

Re: To: John Gay

Robert Tilley wrote: Regarding upgrading a Potato Debian to Woody, I beseech you for aid! Given your hints that there is a point in the installation process where you can choose to install Woody instead of Potato, I wiped my disk for the third time and proceeded with a reinstall. Failure.

To: John Gay

Regarding upgrading a Potato Debian to Woody, I beseech you for aid!   Given your hints that there is a point in the installation process where you can choose to install Woody instead of Potato, I wiped my disk for the third time and proceeded with a reinstall.   Failure.  I noticed no point