Silvan schrieb:
On Thursday 13 May 2004 12:18 pm, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
You're right, thanks. I'll change to user instead of staff (of
course I trust my wife but I'm not sure about myself ;-) ). No o.k. I
just feel better I guess using a group that is made for it.
Or make your own and set it up
Nathaniel W. Turner schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 May 2004 11:48 am, Birgit und Ulrich Fürst wrote:
By the way. Is it bad to use staff instead of user as group? I didn't
find any system files using staff.
FWIW, The staff group has write access to everything
On Thursday 13 May 2004 12:18 pm, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
You're right, thanks. I'll change to user instead of staff (of
course I trust my wife but I'm not sure about myself ;-) ). No o.k. I
just feel better I guess using a group that is made for it.
Or make your own and set it up how you want.
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 08:13 am, Bart Dorsey wrote:
On Monday 10 May 2004 11:17 am, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
do with the sticky bit, about which I wouldn't mind reading. It
seems that in most references that I have seen they don't talk about
it much.
Okay, here goes ;) you asked for it
On Monday 10 May 2004 12:06 pm, Antiphon wrote:
If I get it right 0007 would lead to denie access to anyone not beeing
user or in the group of the file, and giving full access to the file for
user and group? That would be what I want!
No. 0007 means that anyone can write to it who is not
On Monday 10 May 2004 11:17 am, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
Would some explain further the 4 number system? More exactly, the last
three numbers are clear, they are explained everywhere, but the first
one, refering to special, is not explained anywhere that I know. I
will be happy to read about
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 07:13:04AM -0500, Bart Dorsey wrote:
Okay, here goes ;) you asked for it ;)
Thank you
first off, binary
snip
You should get the idea.
Beautiful up to here. All is clear.
BTW, the sticky bits are overlaid on top of these to create the extra
digit...
4 2
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 9:11 am, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
BTW, the sticky bits are overlaid on top of these to create the extra
digit...
4 2 1
rwx rwx rwx
can you be more explicit?
Sure, I'll try the first rwx is the 4's place, the second rwx is the 2's
place, and the
Bart Dorsey wrote:
Maybe it would be somewhat easier to understand if you separated the
numeric / octal (e.g., 2777) representation of the sticky bits from the
alphabetic representation (e.g., rwsrwsrwt)?
Attempting to do so:
* In numeric representation, the sticky bits are represented by a
Bart Dorsey schrieb:
The real proper way to do this is to create your family-group (in fact the
users group would suffice for this, just add both users to is (why is this
not the default in debian?)
them create /home/shared-stuff
and set it 775
chmod 775 /home/shared-stuff
then set the group
Silvan schrieb:
On Sunday 09 May 2004 02:53 pm, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
Where is the file? I don't run Mozilla, so I'm not familiar with that.
Is it under /usr somewhere, or what?
It's under /home/.mozilla/ ...
In this directory and in subdirectories mozilla stores it's settings
and the mails and
I wrote:
That's nearly what I did first. Just nearly because the directory's
owner is ulrich:staff (we're both in staff).
By the way. Is it bad to use staff instead of user as group? I didn't
find any system files using staff.
Ulrich
On Mon, 10 May 2004 17:45:36 +0200, Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Silvan schrieb:
This seems like what you want. It would probably be better to use a
umask of 0007 instead, so you still have *some* control. (I should
have used that in the above example, but I'm too lazy to go
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:06:42PM -0400, Antiphon wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2004 17:45:36 +0200, Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Silvan schrieb:
This seems like what you want. It would probably be better to use a
umask of 0007 instead, so you still have *some* control. (I should
Antonio Rodriguez schrieb:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:06:42PM -0400, Antiphon wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2004 17:45:36 +0200, Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Silvan schrieb:
This seems like what you want. It would probably be better to use a
umask of 0007 instead, so you still have *some*
Antiphon schrieb:
On Mon, 10 May 2004 17:45:36 +0200, Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Silvan schrieb:
If I get it right 0007 would lead to denie access to anyone not
beeing user or in the group of the file, and giving full access to
the file for user and group? That would be what I
On Mon, 10 May 2004 18:45:55 +0200, Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Antiphon schrieb:
On Mon, 10 May 2004 17:45:36 +0200, Ulrich Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Silvan schrieb:
If I get it right 0007 would lead to denie access to anyone not
beeing user or in the group of the file,
Antiphon schrieb:
The executable bit can be applied to files and directories alike since,
in reality, a directory is merely just a kind of file.
rw-rw would be 660
So setting my umask to 006 would lead to let new files be 660, right?
Ulrich
On Monday 10 May 2004 02:01 pm, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
Antiphon schrieb:
The executable bit can be applied to files and directories alike since,
in reality, a directory is merely just a kind of file.
rw-rw would be 660
So setting my umask to 006 would lead to let new files be 660,
* Antiphon [Mon, 10 May 2004 20:23:02 -0400]:
rw-rw would be 660
So setting my umask to 006 would lead to let new files be 660, right?
That should do the trick
sorry but nope. UMASK=006 would yield permissions rwxrwx--x (771). you
need a little binary arithmetic to understand
Ulrich Fürst writes:
Antiphon schrieb:
The executable bit can be applied to files and directories alike
since, in reality, a directory is merely just a kind of file.
rw-rw would be 660
So setting my umask to 006 would lead to let new files be 660,
right?
UMASK(2)
* Adeodato Simó [Tue, 11 May 2004 02:38:43 +0200]:
* Antiphon [Mon, 10 May 2004 20:23:02 -0400]:
rw-rw would be 660
So setting my umask to 006 would lead to let new files be 660, right?
That should do the trick
sorry but nope. UMASK=006 would yield permissions rwxrwx--x (771).
Hallo and good evening!
I want to use the same mozilla-profile
for different users. But every knew file
gets the permission - r w - r - - r - -
. So no other user can get write
access. I found out that I should set
the sgid/suid-bit for the directories
but that doesn't help. Whenever I
Am Sonntag, 9. Mai 2004 11:10 schrieb Ulrich Fürst:
I want to use the same mozilla-profile
for different users. But every knew file
gets the permission - r w - r - - r - -
. So no other user can get write
access. I found out that I should set
the sgid/suid-bit for the directories
but
* Jan Torben Heuer [Sun, 09 May 2004 14:57:25 +0200]:
look for umask. Maybe setting it to umask 002 in /etc/profile might help
you.
If that doesn't work, try:
# echo umask 002 /etc/X11/Xsession.d/95local-umask
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Man is
Jan Torben Heuer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 9. Mai 2004 11:10 schrieb Ulrich Fürst:
I want to use the same mozilla-profile
for different users. But every knew file
gets the permission - r w - r - - r - -
. So no other user can get write
access. I found out that I should set
the sgid/suid-bit for the
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jan Torben Heuer [Sun, 09 May 2004 14:57:25 +0200]:
look for umask. Maybe setting it to umask 002 in /etc/profile might help
you.
If that doesn't work, try:
# echo umask 002 /etc/X11/Xsession.d/95local-umask
That only changes things for the kde-console, too.
Ulrich
* Ulrich Fürst [Sun, 09 May 2004 17:16:06 +0200]:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
If that doesn't work, try:
# echo umask 002 /etc/X11/Xsession.d/95local-umask
That only changes things for the kde-console, too.
mmm, i hadn't tested. now i have and:
- works in mozilla when saving a image or
On Sunday 09 May 2004 05:10 am, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
I want to use the same mozilla-profile
for different users. But every knew file
gets the permission - r w - r - - r - -
. So no other user can get write
access. I found out that I should set
Where is the file? I don't run Mozilla, so
Silvan wrote:
On Sunday 09 May 2004 05:10 am, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
I want to use the same mozilla-profile
for different users. But every knew file
gets the permission - r w - r - - r - -
. So no other user can get write
access. I found out that I should set
Where is the file? I don't run
* Ulrich Fürst [Sun, 09 May 2004 20:53:16 +0200]:
it. And the bookmarks-file should be for us both, too. So what I want
is that mozilla uses the directory
/home/.mozilla/ for storing its files for my wife as well as for me.
Mozilla points
korrekt to the directory but because my wife's account
Adeodato Simó schrieb:
* Ulrich Fürst [Sun, 09 May 2004 20:53:16 +0200]:
it. And the bookmarks-file should be for us both, too. So what I want
is that mozilla uses the directory
/home/.mozilla/ for storing its files for my wife as well as for me.
Mozilla points
korrekt to the directory but because
On Sunday 09 May 2004 02:53 pm, Ulrich Fürst wrote:
Where is the file? I don't run Mozilla, so I'm not familiar with that.
Is it under /usr somewhere, or what?
It's under /home/.mozilla/ ...
In this directory and in subdirectories mozilla stores it's settings
and the mails and so on.
The real proper way to do this is to create your family-group (in fact the
users group would suffice for this, just add both users to is (why is this
not the default in debian?)
them create /home/shared-stuff
and set it 775
chmod 775 /home/shared-stuff
then set the group sticky bit on the
34 matches
Mail list logo
