On Friday 22 Mar 2002 2:28 am, you wrote:
> Do you mean time to upgrade the laptop or time to upgrade to woody? Is the
> version of KDE that part of woody more efficient?
The laptop. I'm not sure that there are any significant differences in
resource utilisation between kde 2.1 and 2.2. Both wil
Oops, sorry for posting this twice. When it didn't show up after about an hour
I re-sent it. I didn't realize how slow this listserver is.
Please respond to the second one as I think it is more well thought out.
-Colin
Colin Andrews wrote:
> I don't think, realistically, that I will ever really upgrade this
> system($20 garage sale 486 laptop) to woody.
I don't think, realistically, that you will ever get kde 2.1/2.2 to run at a
useable speed on such a machine. Time to upgrade. Sorry.
Simon Hepburn.
>From scanning the archives of this list and debian-user, this seems to be a
>problem that other people have had in the past, but the *right*
way to solve this still isn't clear to me.
First, I'm using Potato (2.2r5).
I already had XDM & WinowMaker installed & working (if you can call it that)
>From scanning the archives of this list, this seems to be a problem that other
>people have had in the past, but the *right*
way to solve this still isn't clear to me.
First, I'm using Potato (2.2r5).
I already had XDM & WinowMaker installed & working (if you can call it that). I
got the kde
5 matches
Mail list logo
