On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, David Pye wrote:
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:53, Nate Duehr wrote:
<...>
There are actually dependency issues that apt-get CANNOT resolve that
dselect can. Specifically when a package is added to the archives and
a new dependency is created, apt-get chokes on it saying that it
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:53, Nate Duehr wrote:
> > I'm sorry ... I've used dselect. I still have bad dreams about the
> > hours I spent lost wandering round in there (not to mention in its
> > so-called help system). IMHO it's user interface exemplifies the
> > phrase "as user friendly as a co
On Jul 25, 2004, at 8:16 PM, Nick Boyce wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:30:50 -0600 (MDT), Bruce Sass wrote:
Since people keep telling us that apt-get is braindead, and that
aptitude does a better job, I tried that too, with similarly scary
results. Since aptitude's output is more compact, I include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 26 July 2004 04:16, Nick Boyce wrote:
> I'm sorry ... I've used dselect. I still have bad dreams about the
> hours I spent lost wandering round in there (not to mention in its
> so-called help system). IMHO it's user interface exemplifies t
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Paul Johnson wrote:
Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
Since people keep telling us that apt-get is braindead, and that
aptitude does a better job, I tried that too, with similarly scary
results. Since aptitude's output is mo
Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
}> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
}>>> Since people keep telling us that apt-get is braindead, and that
}>>> aptitude does a better job, I tried that too, with similarly scary
}>>> results. Since aptitude's output is more compact, I include i
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:30:50 -0600 (MDT), Bruce Sass wrote:
>>> Since people keep telling us that apt-get is braindead, and that
>>> aptitude does a better job, I tried that too, with similarly scary
>>> results. Since aptitude's output is more compact, I include it here.
>>
>> In my experience,
Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
>>> Since people keep telling us that apt-get is braindead, and that
>>> aptitude does a better job, I tried that too, with similarly scary
>>> results. Since aptitude's output is more compact, I include it h
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
Since people keep telling us that apt-get is braindead, and that
aptitude does a better job, I tried that too, with similarly scary
results. Since aptitude's output is more compact, I include it here.
In my experience, aptitude has its own set of pro
9 matches
Mail list logo
