Re: safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-26 Thread David Goodenough
I had this problem on a newly installed machine, but I solved it by downgrading kdelibs4 and kdelibs-bin to 3.3.2-6.1. kmail now does not segfault. I await 3.4.1 with interest. David On Saturday 16 July 2005 02:16, Tim Folger wrote: Has anyone upgraded sid within the last few days without

OT: Package stability (was: Re: safe to upgrade sid?)

2005-07-17 Thread Anders Breindahl
On Saturday 16 July 2005 21:00, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Anders Breindahl [Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:37:40 +0200]: It is rather disturbing, that errors in libraries in unstable is not prioritized any higher than the ongoing transitions. Sorry, but if this fuckup has not been fixed already is

Re: OT: Package stability (was: Re: safe to upgrade sid?)

2005-07-17 Thread Josh Metzler
On Sunday 17 July 2005 11:35 am, Anders Breindahl wrote: ... All that is well known. The morale is, that I still shouldn't suggest Unstable to users I help install, and that I really should consider Testing myself. I assume that such ``errors'' as kmail breaking would be considered rather

Re: safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-16 Thread Tim Folger
Thanks for the advice, Josh and Larry. I think I will hold off on upgrading. Tim On Friday 15 July 2005 09:11 pm, Josh Metzler wrote: On Friday 15 July 2005 09:16 pm, Tim Folger wrote: Has anyone upgraded sid within the last few days without encountering the segfault with kmail? Does the

Re: safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-16 Thread Anders Breindahl
On Saturday 16 July 2005 05:11, Josh Metzler wrote: There is also the gcc 4.0 transition going on and the xfree86 - x.org transition. The current plan is that qt3 and then kde 3.4 will be uploaded once x.org has built on all architectures. I plan to wait on upgrading anything x or kde

Re: safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-16 Thread Larry Garfield
Well, there is a certain logic to it. Sid is explicitly not intended for production use (although many, including myself, get away with it without too man problems). So, if given the choice between these two options: - Upgrade package XYZ - Switch to gcc 4 - Recompile/debug package XYZ under

Re: safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-16 Thread Josh Metzler
On Saturday 16 July 2005 01:37 pm, Anders Breindahl wrote: On Saturday 16 July 2005 05:11, Josh Metzler wrote: There is also the gcc 4.0 transition going on and the xfree86 - x.org transition. The current plan is that qt3 and then kde 3.4 will be uploaded once x.org has built on all

Re: safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-16 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Anders Breindahl [Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:37:40 +0200]: It is rather disturbing, that errors in libraries in unstable is not prioritized any higher than the ongoing transitions. Sorry, but if this fuckup has not been fixed already is because it can't be fixed without major pain, due to GCC

safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-15 Thread Tim Folger
Has anyone upgraded sid within the last few days without encountering the segfault with kmail? Does the upgrade still break kmail? Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-15 Thread Larry Garfield
KMail is behaving itself for me (Sid + Alioth), but right now konq-plugins and kdeaddons are conflicting with each other, even though kdeaddons requires konq-plugins. :-) (I think it's because for some reason apt-get show gives konq-plugins 3.4.0pre2 while apt-get install gives konq-plugins

Re: safe to upgrade sid?

2005-07-15 Thread Josh Metzler
On Friday 15 July 2005 09:16 pm, Tim Folger wrote: Has anyone upgraded sid within the last few days without encountering the segfault with kmail? Does the upgrade still break kmail? Tim There hasn't been any change in sid regarding kde libraries or kmail - the kdelibs version that causes