* Am Di, 13 Jul 2004 schrieb Nick Boyce:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:13:41 +0200, Christoph Maurer wrote:
I have installed the Kde 3.2.2 packages for Debian Woody available
for a few days now.
The install worked fine and KDE seems to work much better than with
the 3.2.1 packages. But there is
Hello List!
I have installed the Kde 3.2.2 packages for Debian Woody available
for a few days now.
The install worked fine and KDE seems to work much better than with
the 3.2.1 packages. But there is one annoying problem: In a few
programs, e.g. in konqueror, the menu bar is a litte bit
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:13:41 +0200, Christoph Maurer wrote:
I have installed the Kde 3.2.2 packages for Debian Woody available
for a few days now.
The install worked fine and KDE seems to work much better than with
the 3.2.1 packages. But there is one annoying problem: In a few
programs, e.g.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Domingo, 1 de Febrero de 2004 19:47, Roelof Wobben escribió:
Hai,
Yesterday i installed Debian Woody.
I saw that KDE was a very old one.
How can i upgrade my KDE without losing stability.
You can try the unofficial packages made by
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 05:47, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Hai,
Yesterday i installed Debian Woody.
I saw that KDE was a very old one.
How can i upgrade my KDE without losing stability.
Regards,
Roelof
_
MSN Zoeken helpt je om de
be better ?
(Given that the Debian Woody 3.1.5 debs aren't ready yet.)
It's a more official source of KDE-for-Woody.
Nick Boyce
Bristol, UK
--
We did a risk management review. We concluded that there was no risk
of any management.
-- Hugo Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hai,
Yesterday i installed Debian Woody.
I saw that KDE was a very old one.
How can i upgrade my KDE without losing stability.
Regards,
Roelof
_
MSN Zoeken helpt je om de gekste dingen te vinden! http://search.msn.nl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 01 February 2004 19:47, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Hai,
Yesterday i installed Debian Woody.
I saw that KDE was a very old one.
How can i upgrade my KDE without losing stability.
You can update fairly easily from KDE 2.x to KDE 3.1.4 by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 06:47:20PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Yesterday i installed Debian Woody.
I saw that KDE was a very old one.
How can i upgrade my KDE without losing stability.
Easy.
A Dimecres 26 Febrer 2003 02:00, Ralf Nolden va escriure:
On his site, he only suggests this if you've installed any of the interum
KDE stuff. I've only ever had the Official Debian KDE2.2.2, therefore it
'should upgrade cleanly.
It should, but it may not do it cleanly and you'll run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2003 10:24, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
Questions to Ralf:
I do the same the last week , and I have found differences betweend the
directories /dist/stable/main/binary-i386 and /dist/woody/main/binary-i386.
It's
A Dimecres 26 Febrer 2003 20:10, Ralf Nolden va escriure:
I do the same the last week , and I have found differences betweend the
directories /dist/stable/main/binary-i386 and
/dist/woody/main/binary-i386.
It's normal?
No, stable is a symlink to woody. You probably pulled once that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2003 20:45, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
A Dimecres 26 Febrer 2003 20:10, Ralf Nolden va escriure:
I do the same the last week , and I have found differences betweend
the directories /dist/stable/main/binary-i386
I've been dreading this, but here goes:
I'm going to do a full upgrade from KDE2.2.2 to KDE3.1 on my Woody system.
Since Ralfs page does not give any known issues, here is what I'm doing.
To be sure I get a Full KDE3.1 system, according to Ralf, I'm using:
debian:/home/johngay# apt-get install
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 3:05 pm, John Gay wrote:
I've been dreading this, but here goes:
I'm going to do a full upgrade from KDE2.2.2 to KDE3.1 on my Woody
system. Since Ralfs page does not give any known issues, here is what
I'm doing.
To be sure I get a Full KDE3.1 system, according
On Tue 25 Feb 2003 23:10, John Schmidt wrote:
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 3:05 pm, John Gay wrote:
I've been dreading this, but here goes:
I'm going to do a full upgrade from KDE2.2.2 to KDE3.1 on my Woody
system. Since Ralfs page does not give any known issues, here is what
I'm doing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2003 01:06, John Gay wrote:
Don't do this. First remove the kde2.2.2 completely. Then install
Ralph's packages. On his web site, he talks about installations and
upgrades.
On his site, he only suggests this if
,
Ralf
On Freitag, 17. Januar 2003 12:15, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
* Ralf Nolden schrieb am 16.01.03 um 21:06 Uhr:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Hi Ralf,
Sorry for cross-posting, first of all. I've build a set of debian woody
packages for KDE 3.1 (as most will now
On Friday 17 January 2003 12:15, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
And what is the difference between the kmail builtin GnuPG support
and the plugin version?
The plugin supports PGP/MIME (i.e. detached signatures and
signed/encrypted attachments) while the builtin GnuPG only supports
inline PGP
On Friday 17 January 2003 13:01, Ralf Nolden wrote:
Ok. I installed the above packages (and pinentry-qt).
Don't. Use pinentry-gtk for now.
Ralf, please don't package pinentry-qt until the problems there are
fixed. Also, please make sure that whenever you announce something like
that, you
On Friday 17 Jan 2003 12:14 pm, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
On Friday 17 January 2003 12:15, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
And what is the difference between the kmail builtin GnuPG support
and the plugin version?
How do you setup the plugin version?
Tom
On Friday 17 Jan 2003 2:09 pm, you wrote:
On Freitag, 17. Januar 2003 13:47, Tom Badran wrote:
On Friday 17 Jan 2003 12:14 pm, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
On Friday 17 January 2003 12:15, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
And what is the difference between the kmail builtin GnuPG support
and the
El Vie 09 Nov 2001 03:51, Ivan E. Moore II escribió:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:54:45AM +0100, Steffen Evers wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 18:40, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
I have noticed that several packages are now 2.2.x, but kdebase and
others are still 2.1.x
Wait until
Greetings:
debian-kde archives were just updated and I see all the mails
regarding the kde-testing stuff. Sorry to all that were
affected.
I've got black box running and will learn the ways of a mutt
next :)
Thanks all, not as smoked as stoned I did! :)
/me babbles and giggles to
[...]
Unpacking replacement kdelibs3 ...
Replacing files in old package kdebase-libs ...
Replacing files in old package konqueror ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4%3a2.2.1-14_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:34:30AM +0100, Steffen Evers wrote:
[...]
Unpacking replacement kdelibs3 ...
Replacing files in old package kdebase-libs ...
Replacing files in old package konqueror ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4%3a2.2.1-14_i386.deb
(--unpack):
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 18:40, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
I have noticed that several packages are now 2.2.x, but kdebase and others
are still 2.1.x
Wait until tomorrow and everything is fine? :-)
well..it depends on when kdebase makes it's way into testing. you can do
a dpkg
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:54:45AM +0100, Steffen Evers wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 18:40, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
I have noticed that several packages are now 2.2.x, but kdebase and
others are still 2.1.x
Wait until tomorrow and everything is fine? :-)
well..it depends on
I too have fallen for the 50% upgrade and conflicting packages trap -
konqueror now fails with an error message
/usr/lib/libkssl.so.2: undefined symbol: polish__7KDialog
and then reports cannot create dialog for text/html.
Is there a safe way to downgrade back to the old kdelibs3 4:2.1.2-3?
29 matches
Mail list logo
