On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:29:41PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:29:48AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Basically, update cvs to the current 2.4 in order to get security fixes
from newer mainline 2.4, and send out packages.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at
tags 249205 stable
thanks
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 07:55:00PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:08:48 -0700
From: Christine Jamison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: SPECTRA Software, Inc.
To: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#249205: gettyps: no
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 10:22:54AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:29:48AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:44:06AM +0900, Horms wrote:
What needs to be done?
Basically, update cvs to the current 2.4 in order to get security fixes
from
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:46:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:05:37PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:40:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:20:35PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Who took that decision ? And even then, how would it be all that
different from the many alternative trees out there, like the -mm one
Christoph refered to me recently.
Nothing is stoping us from presenting usefull stuff
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 07:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
I wonder though, i thought you where not a DD, and so couldn't upload,
is this correct ?
That's correct; I had a sponsor ready to do the upload, though.
--
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:56:35PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:29:41PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:29:48AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Basically, update cvs to the current 2.4 in order to get security fixes
from newer mainline
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
Hi Christoph,
Am Mi, den 07.07.2004 schrieb Christoph Hellwig um 14:58:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:22:38PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
well, installing a kernel first to see if i like its patches is not very
compfortable.
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.diff.gz
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If
* William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-07 18:29]:
you mean 2.4.27-rc3 or something like that?
All the security fixes that _I_ am aware of are fixed
as of 2.4.27-rc2.
That sounds good to me.
No, it would be much better to do an update of 2.4.26 now with those
security patches
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel-tree-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
Hi guys,
I did quite a bit of work on this bug, but i had stop there since
it is an upstream bug and i houneslty i don't know how to go further.
Please can you kindly take care, as debian kernel maintainers, take care
of it.
Fabio
--
user fajita: step one
fajita Whatever the problem,
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-07 18:29]:
you mean 2.4.27-rc3 or something like that?
All the security fixes that _I_ am aware of are fixed
as of 2.4.27-rc2.
That sounds good to me.
No, it would
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 08:38:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:56:35PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:29:41PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:29:48AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Basically, update cvs to the
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.7/kernel-doc-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.7/kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.diff.gz
to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 03:47:41 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#257504: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.7 2.6.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi Sven,
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.7/debian/patch-2.6.7-1.bz2
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.7/debian/patch-2.6.7-2.bz2
For this kind of stuff, it is better to work on the source package of
kernel-source.
try apt-get source kernel-source-2.6.7 and experiment with it.
my point
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 08:58:44AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
Hi Sven,
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.7/debian/patch-2.6.7-1.bz2
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.7/debian/patch-2.6.7-2.bz2
For this kind of stuff, it is better to work on the source package of
kernel-source.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:43:48AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
Hi Sven,
Ah, what is your problem with :
http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/kernel/kernel/2.6/source/trunk/kernel-source-2.6.7-2.6.7/debian/patches
Well, probably the tagged version thereof.
About none. That's
Herbert Xu wrote:
Does this patch help?
Yes it works. Sorry for having no time to check it earlier.
Thanks,
Torsten
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:43:48AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
So, do i see right that neither of VServer and SKAS (the UML patch) are
in the debian-kernel?
You're absolutely right. And you can be sure they won't get into the
Debian packtkit as long as I'm part of the kernel team..
* Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-08 16:57]:
1) Where is the CVS tree?
ssh people.debian.org:~herbert/cvs/ I don't know which modifications
wli has made already since Herbert uploaded his sources.
2) Should this move to SVN. I am happy to help with that.
Sounds like a plan.
--
Martin
Damn,
forgot to attach the files, here they are.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
#!/bin/sh
# usage information
usage() {
echo 'usage:'
echo ' -o output - path to output file for compressed kernel image'
echo ' -a arch- PowerPC sub-architecture'
echo ' -k kernel - path to kernel
Hi,
I happened to see the same. Quick (and anemic) workaround is to use
pci=noacpi boot parameter. This helps---probably.
Explanation? Hmmm, seems to be kinda IRQ-related problem. Unfortunately
have no resources to investigate. This problem (and better solution!) is
certainly worth to
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.70
Severity: grave
Hello,
There is a critical bug on the sarge installation of the daily build of
sarge version 8/7/2004.
In fact the package cannot be installed while the installation of the
base system.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 258251 debian-installer
Bug#258251: initrd-tools cannot be installed during the base system install.
Bug reassigned from package `initrd-tools' to `debian-installer'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
reassign 258251 debian-installer
thanks
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:54:15PM +0200, Felix SPORTELLI wrote:
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.70
Severity: grave
Hello,
There is a critical bug on the sarge installation of the daily build of
sarge version 8/7/2004.
In fact the package cannot
* Felix SPORTELLI [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-08 15:54]:
There is a critical bug on the sarge installation of the daily build of
sarge version 8/7/2004.
In fact the package cannot be installed while the installation of the
base system.
What was the exact error message? Did you have your root
On 2004-07-07 Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 12:29:44PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
The description from kernel-patch-debian and kernel-image does not
list which patches are contained in the Debian diff. That way it's
pretty hard to evaluate which
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-2.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-2.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.7-1_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.7-i386/kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-686-smp_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.7-i386/kernel-headers-2.6-686-smp_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-k7
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: important
The oops occurs on every up x86 kernel available to me. -386, -686, -k7.
I had this issue with kernel-image-2.6.5-*. I fixed that one by
compiling ALSA into the kernel.
following is the hand typed in oops:
-- System
I have also tried every 2.6.6-1 kernel. They work just fine without any
black magic.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:greg]$ lsmod | grep snd_ens1371
snd_ens137124544 3
snd_rawmidi24928 1 snd_ens1371
snd_pcm96996 2 snd_ens1371,snd_pcm_oss
snd_ac97_codec 64452
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 257865 minor
Bug#257865: initrd-tools: assembles raid using mdadm with devfs device names
even when there's no devfs
Severity set to `minor'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
severity 257865 minor
thanks
* Andreas Kroschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-06 14:05]:
instead of /dev/md0, even when there is no devfs installed. This renders
a system without devfs unbootable, if / is on a raid and the raid
modules are loaded from the initrd.
initrd-tools is made to work
[I am not subscribed to debian-kernel.]
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:06:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:57:12PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
* XFree starts treating /dev/psaux and /dev/input/mice equally if both
are listed, i.e. it will work if _either_ of them are
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:07:17PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-08 16:57]:
1) Where is the CVS tree?
ssh people.debian.org:~herbert/cvs/ I don't know which modifications
wli has made already since Herbert uploaded his sources.
Thanks, I have that now.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:07:17PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
ssh people.debian.org:~herbert/cvs/ I don't know which modifications
wli has made already since Herbert uploaded his sources.
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:34:27AM +0900, Horms wrote:
Thanks, I have that now.
I will assume wli
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 02:25:02 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-k7
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: wishlist
I don't see we shouldn't the kernel=image have the swsusp module?
Upstream does not support modular swsusp. The swsusp module patch that we
were previously using
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:15:15AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: normal
Hi, I am running kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 and using software suspend.
Unfortunately, the 'swsusp' module is missing and /proc/acpi/sleep does
nothing
40 matches
Mail list logo
