On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:15:15AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686
> Version: 2.6.7-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi, I am running kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 and using software suspend.
> Unfortunately, the 'swsusp' module is missing and /proc/acpi/sleep does
> nothin
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 02:25:02 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.7-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I don't see we shouldn't the kernel=image have the swsusp module?
>
Upstream does not support modular swsusp. The swsusp module patch that we
were previously us
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:07:17PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> ssh people.debian.org:~herbert/cvs/ I don't know which modifications
>> wli has made already since Herbert uploaded his sources.
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:34:27AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Thanks, I have that now.
> I will assume
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:07:17PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-08 16:57]:
> > 1) Where is the CVS tree?
>
> ssh people.debian.org:~herbert/cvs/ I don't know which modifications
> wli has made already since Herbert uploaded his sources.
Thanks, I have th
[I am not subscribed to debian-kernel.]
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:06:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:57:12PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > * XFree starts treating /dev/psaux and /dev/input/mice equally if both
> > are listed, i.e. it will work if _either_ of them
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-k7
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: wishlist
I don't see we shouldn't the kernel=image have the swsusp module?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7
severity 257865 minor
thanks
* Andreas Kroschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-06 14:05]:
> instead of /dev/md0, even when there is no devfs installed. This renders
> a system without devfs unbootable, if / is on a raid and the raid
> modules are loaded from the initrd.
initrd-tools is made to work
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 257865 minor
Bug#257865: initrd-tools: assembles raid using mdadm with devfs device names
even when there's no devfs
Severity set to `minor'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
I have also tried every 2.6.6-1 kernel. They work just fine without any
black magic.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:greg]$ lsmod | grep snd_ens1371
snd_ens137124544 3
snd_rawmidi24928 1 snd_ens1371
snd_pcm96996 2 snd_ens1371,snd_pcm_oss
snd_ac97_codec 64452 1
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-k7
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: important
The oops occurs on every up x86 kernel available to me. -386, -686, -k7.
I had this issue with kernel-image-2.6.5-*. I fixed that one by
compiling ALSA into the kernel.
following is the hand typed in oops:
-- System Informat
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.7-i386/kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-686-smp_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.7-i386/kernel-headers-2.6-686-smp_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-686_2.6.7-2_i386.d
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-2.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.7-i386_2.6.7-2.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.7-1_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.6-386_2.6.7-2_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.7-2_i38
On 2004-07-07 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 12:29:44PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > The description from kernel-patch-debian and kernel-image does not
> > list which patches are contained in the Debian diff. That way it's
> > pretty hard to evaluate which
* Felix SPORTELLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-08 15:54]:
> There is a critical bug on the sarge installation of the daily build of
> sarge version 8/7/2004.
> In fact the package cannot be installed while the installation of the
> base system.
What was the exact error message? Did you have your
reassign 258251 debian-installer
thanks
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:54:15PM +0200, Felix SPORTELLI wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.70
> Severity: grave
>
> Hello,
> There is a critical bug on the sarge installation of the daily build of
> sarge version 8/7/2004.
> In fact the package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258251 debian-installer
Bug#258251: initrd-tools cannot be installed during the base system install.
Bug reassigned from package `initrd-tools' to `debian-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.70
Severity: grave
Hello,
There is a critical bug on the sarge installation of the daily build of
sarge version 8/7/2004.
In fact the package cannot be installed while the installation of the
base system.
--
*
Hi,
I happened to see the same. Quick (and anemic) workaround is to use
pci=noacpi boot parameter. This helps---probably.
Explanation? Hmmm, seems to be kinda IRQ-related problem. Unfortunately
have no resources to investigate. This problem (and better solution!) is
certainly worth to propagate
Damn,
forgot to attach the files, here they are.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
#!/bin/sh
# usage information
usage() {
echo 'usage:'
echo ' -o - path to output file for compressed kernel image'
echo ' -a - PowerPC sub-architecture'
echo ' -k - path to kernel image file in ELF fo
Ok,
i had the oportunity to try this out with real packages now, and noticed
some stuff needed fixing, which i did. Here is the new mkvmlinuz
attached.
Still the powerpc kernels i built behave strangely, and don't generate
the initrd, which probably means i should not reboot until this is
fixed.
* Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-08 16:57]:
> 1) Where is the CVS tree?
ssh people.debian.org:~herbert/cvs/ I don't know which modifications
wli has made already since Herbert uploaded his sources.
> 2) Should this move to SVN. I am happy to help with that.
Sounds like a plan.
--
Martin M
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:43:48AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> So, do i see right that neither of VServer and SKAS (the UML patch) are
> in the debian-kernel?
You're absolutely right. And you can be sure they won't get into the
Debian packtkit as long as I'm part of the kernel team..
Herbert Xu wrote:
Does this patch help?
Yes it works. Sorry for having no time to check it earlier.
Thanks,
Torsten
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:43:48AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> > Ah, what is your problem with :
> >
> >
> > http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/kernel/kernel/2.6/source/trunk/kernel-source-2.6.7-2.6.7/debian/patches
> >
> > Well, probably the tagged version thereof.
>
> About none
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 08:58:44AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> > > /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.7/debian/patch-2.6.7-1.bz2
> > > /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.7/debian/patch-2.6.7-2.bz2
> >
> > For this kind of stuff, it is better to work on the source package of
> > kernel-so
Hi Sven,
> > /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.7/debian/patch-2.6.7-1.bz2
> > /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.7/debian/patch-2.6.7-2.bz2
>
> For this kind of stuff, it is better to work on the source package of
> kernel-source.
>
> try apt-get source kernel-source-2.6.7 and experiment with it.
m
Hi Sven,
> Ah, what is your problem with :
>
>
> http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/kernel/kernel/2.6/source/trunk/kernel-source-2.6.7-2.6.7/debian/patches
>
> Well, probably the tagged version thereof.
About none. That's somewhat close to the list i'd like the link being in
the description. ;)
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 03:47:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257504: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.7 2.6.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.7/kernel-doc-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.7/kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-sour
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 08:38:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:56:35PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:29:41PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:29:48AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > > >> Basically, update cv
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-07 18:29]:
> > > you mean 2.4.27-rc3 or something like that?
> > > All the security fixes that _I_ am aware of are fixed
> > > as of 2.4.27-rc2.
> >
> > That sounds good to me.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:56:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:29:41PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:29:48AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > >> Basically, update cvs to the current 2.4 in order to get security fixes
> > >> from newer
Hi guys,
I did quite a bit of work on this bug, but i had stop there since
it is an upstream bug and i houneslty i don't know how to go further.
Please can you kindly take care, as debian kernel maintainers, take care
of it.
Fabio
--
fajita: step one
Whatever the problem, step one i
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel-tree-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
kernel
* William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-07 18:29]:
> > you mean 2.4.27-rc3 or something like that?
> > All the security fixes that _I_ am aware of are fixed
> > as of 2.4.27-rc2.
>
> That sounds good to me.
No, it would be much better to do an update of 2.4.26 now with those
security
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.diff.gz
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.7_2.6.7-3_all.deb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If n
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: normal
Hi, I am running kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 and using software suspend.
Unfortunately, the 'swsusp' module is missing and /proc/acpi/sleep does
nothing anymore. With kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686 I had no problems.
Also, I have no inter
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Am Mi, den 07.07.2004 schrieb Christoph Hellwig um 14:58:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:22:38PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > > well, installing a kernel first to see if i like its patches is not very
> > > compf
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:56:35PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:29:41PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:29:48AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > >> Basically, update cvs to the current 2.4 in order to get security fixes
> > >> from newer
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:17:08AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 07:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I wonder though, i thought you where not a DD, and so couldn't upload,
> > is this correct ?
>
> That's correct; I had a sponsor ready to do the upload, though.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:34:55PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:46:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:05:37PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:40:49PM +
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 07:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
>
> I wonder though, i thought you where not a DD, and so couldn't upload,
> is this correct ?
That's correct; I had a sponsor ready to do the upload, though.
--
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:46:55PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 12:24, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 04:33:09PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > I would like to get kernel-source-2.6.7-3 out tomorrow, if possible.
> > > Does anyone have anything pressing t
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:20:35PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > Who took that decision ? And even then, how would it be all that
> > different from the many alternative trees out there, like the -mm one
> > Christoph refered to me recently.
> >
> > Nothing is stoping us from presenting usefu
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:46:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:05:37PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:40:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 10:22:54AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:29:48AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:44:06AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > What needs to be done?
> >
> > Basically, update cvs to the current 2.4 in order to get security fixes
>
46 matches
Mail list logo
