Bug#263058: CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE=y

tags 263058 pending thanks Hi, Troy Benjegerdes writes: I've confirmed that setting CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE=y resolves the problem. Thanks for investigating this. I've checked the change into svn. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe

Re: Bug#263057: binutils: Unrecognized opcode: dssall on powerpc

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:23:12PM +0100, James Troup wrote: Please try the patch in: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.3/1810.html cp'ed that patch to ppc-patch: muaddib:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.7# patch -p1 ../ppc-patch patching file arch/ppc/Makefile patch:

Re: Bug#263057: binutils: Unrecognized opcode: dssall on powerpc

Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:23:12PM +0100, James Troup wrote: Please try the patch in: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.3/1810.html http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=109130201415594w=2 is a better URL, because it

Bug#263057: Info received (was Bug#263057: binutils: Unrecognized opcode: dssall on powerpc)

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#263169: loadmodules incomplete

Package: initrd-tools Version: 0.1.72 mkinitrd does not detect some SCSI modules to add them to the loadmodules file on the initrd, e.g. sata_sil. At boot time these modules are not loaded, which might break access to the root disk. Attached you can find a patch. Regards Harri ---

Re: Bug#263057: binutils: Unrecognized opcode: dssall on powerpc

tags 263057 pending thanks Hi, Ingo Juergensmann writes: cp'ed that patch to ppc-patch: Obviously, the list archive interface ate a number of vital spaces. Please supply a working patch file It's in svn now. I have no idea how to construct those nifty URLs that you can click on, anyway

Re: Bug#263057: binutils: Unrecognized opcode: dssall on powerpc

Hi, Jens Schmalzing: I have no idea how to construct those nifty URLs that you can click on, Got it :) URL:http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/kernel/trunk/kernel/powerpc/kernel- patch-powerpc-2.6.7-2.6.7/patches/binutils.diff?view=auto Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le

Bug#232729: PDC20262 IDE Controller gives CRC errors and panics

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, With a 2.6.8-rc2-bk9 kernel things work fine right now, no CRC errors so far. Today I had CRC errors again :( They occured while copying data from /dev/hde to /dev/hdf. When having only hde active, I get no CRC errors. So the problem does

[no subject]

unsubscribe

Re: Bug#263057: binutils: Unrecognized opcode: dssall on powerpc

On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:38:57AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: As I said, a working patch is in svn. Since you seem in need of it, I will also attach it to this message. Well, needing is too strong... after compiling the kernel with old binutils and actually running it, I just wanted to

Re: Bug#263057: binutils: Unrecognized opcode: dssall on powerpc

Hi, Ingo Juergensmann writes: Anyway, regarding to other mails regarding to this bugreport, I think you can now close this bug. It's tagged as pending and will be closed on the next upload of kernel-patch-powerpc. If anybody feels the need for it, feel free to reassign to that package, or

CAN-2004-0554 is not fixed

Hi, I just discovered that CAN-2004-0554 is still valid, at least for kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 2.4.26-4 from unstable. I tested it on two machines, and both machines crashed when running crash.c. Norbert

Re: CAN-2004-0554 is not fixed

Hi, Norbert Tretkowski writes: I just discovered that CAN-2004-0554 is still valid, at least for kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 2.4.26-4 from unstable. I tested it on two machines, and both machines crashed when running crash.c. This is related to Bug#262540. In fact, patch-2.4.26-3 has not

Re: CAN-2004-0554 is not fixed

* Jens Schmalzing wrote: Norbert Tretkowski writes: I just discovered that CAN-2004-0554 is still valid, at least for kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686 2.4.26-4 from unstable. I tested it on two machines, and both machines crashed when running crash.c. This is related to Bug#262540. In fact,

Processed: Re: CAN-2004-0554 user application can hang the kernel

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 253871 Bug#253871: CAN-2004-0554 user application can hang the kernel Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#253871: CAN-2004-0554 user application can hang the kernel

reopen 253871 thanks Because of #262540, this bug is still valid for current kernel images. Norbert

Processing of kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_powerpc.changes

kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5.dsc kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5.diff.gz kernel-patch-debian-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb kernel-tree-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb

kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kernel-doc-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.26/kernel-doc-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb kernel-patch-debian-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.26/kernel-patch-debian-2.4.26_2.4.26-5_all.deb kernel-source-2.4.26_2.4.26-5.diff.gz to

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

I spent some time talking with the glibc maintainers about this. These are all my own opinions, but the others seemed to agree with me. I think this would be a very good idea. On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Hi, given the current sarge deadline and the

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now. Daniel -- / Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---\ | We are Debian of Borg.| | You will be packaged.

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:28:23PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now. Oops. OK, it would have to be a separate GCC source package or depend on a new version of toolchain-source then. We could do this just for sarge and build it from gcc-3.4

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

Daniel Burrows wrote: gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now. and gcc-3.3 also because of libstdc++5... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: 2.6.8 release

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:53:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: mailine kernels build out of the box. The additional early printk support in the ia64 patch has been replaced with something better in mainline, leaving only a completly unrelated and unexplainable usb change in david's patch

Bug#263316: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp: kobject_register oops during modprobe

Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp Severity: normal On a newly-installed Dell PowerEdge 2600 I get the following on boot: hw_random hardware driver 1.0.0 loaded kobject_register failed for aic79xx (-17) [kobject_register+91/96] kobject_register+0x5b/0x60 [bus_add_driver+80/176]

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I spent some time talking with the glibc maintainers about this. These are all my own opinions, but the others seemed to agree with me. I think this would be a very good idea. On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: