Re: 2.6.8 release

2004-08-20 Thread dann frazier
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 07:37:27PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 12:28:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 03:08:45PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: I think you're mistaken. The known bug in the DV scsi core was fixed 9 weeks ago (according to

Re: 2.6.8 release

2004-08-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 09:40:47PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: James took a look at my test box, and has submitted[1] a fix upstream. So, this means we no longer need drivers-scsi-sym53c8xx_revert.dpatch. I know that the proper way to update a patch in kernel-source is to add another patch -

Re: 2.6.8 release

2004-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 07:25:06AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 09:40:47PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: James took a look at my test box, and has submitted[1] a fix upstream

Re: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8 and pristine linux 2.6.8 kernel

2004-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:43:46AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:16:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:13:08AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:02:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:17:11PM

Re: kernel-image-2.4.26-i386_2.4.26-6_i386.changes REJECTED

2004-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:02:13PM -0400, Debian Installer wrote: Rejected: kernel-image-2.4-586tsc_2.4.26-6_i386.deb: old version (2.4.27-1) in unstable = new version (2.4.26-6) targeted at unstable. Rejected: kernel-image-2.4-686_2.4.26-6_i386.deb: old version (2.4.27-1) in unstable =

Re: kernel-image-2.4.26-i386_2.4.26-6_i386.changes REJECTED

2004-08-20 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Sven Luther wrote: Who uploaded 2.4.27 packages to unstable forgeting to rename them to 2.4.27 ones ? Nobody... these are dummy packages which depend on the latest 2.4 kernel packages available, and don't have the exact kernel version in their package name. Norbert

Bug#266996: NFORCE2: hda: lost interrupt

2004-08-20 Thread Philipp Kolmann
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7 Severity: normal Hi! I have a NFORCE2 based Athlon board installed and can't use the Debian -k7 Kernels since 2.6.7 because I get a lockup during boot: hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status 0x64 hda: DMA interrupt recovery hda: lost interrupt I have a vanilla

Bug#267006: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686: Scheduling while atomic in sys_close

2004-08-20 Thread Mike Fedyk
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 Version: 2.6.7-2 Severity: normal On a later boot it looks like my / on raid5 is rebuilding, I'm not sure if it was during this boot also. Is this an oops and scheduling while atomic debug? NET: Registered protocol family 10 Disabled Privacy Extensions on

Bug#267014: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686: OOps in networking during netatalk startup

2004-08-20 Thread Mike Fedyk
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 Version: 2.6.7-2 Severity: important I'm trying to upgrade this system from a custom 2.6.3+patches kernel and I ran into this problem. Let me know if you need any more info. EXT3 FS on md1, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.

Bug#267029: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: Invalid link in /lib/modules/2.6.8-powerpc/

2004-08-20 Thread Eugen Dedu
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-1 Severity: minor /lib/modules/2.6.8-powerpc/ contains a invalid symbolic link source to /home/hch/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8/tmp/kernel-source-2.6.8-powerpc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990,

Bug#267029: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: Invalid link in /lib/modules/2.6.8-powerpc/

2004-08-20 Thread Eugen Dedu
Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:07:57PM +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-1 Severity: minor /lib/modules/2.6.8-powerpc/ contains a invalid symbolic link source to /home/hch/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8/tmp/kernel-source-2.6.8-powerpc This is

Bug#267029: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: Invalid link in /lib/modules/2.6.8-powerpc/

2004-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:07:57PM +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-1 Severity: minor /lib/modules/2.6.8-powerpc/ contains a invalid symbolic link source to /home/hch/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8/tmp/kernel-source-2.6.8-powerpc This is a

Processed: 8139too and 8139cp (Re: Processed: reassign 266564 to hotplug)

2004-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 266564 kernel Bug#266564: two network cards problem Bug reassigned from package `hotplug' to `kernel'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Re: #259031: ioctl FBIOGET_CON2FBMAP: Invalid argument on CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=m kernel

2004-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 259031 kernel Bug#259031: ioctl FBIOGET_CON2FBMAP: Invalid argument on CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=m kernel Bug reassigned from package `jfbterm' to `kernel'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#267077: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686: e1000 can't unload: usage count=-256

2004-08-20 Thread jlquinn
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 Version: 2.6.7-2 Severity: normal With an IBM T41p, I ran into this problem. I was trying to get the machine to sleep unsuccessfully with: echo mem /sys/power/state several times, but the machine was unable to go to sleep (see next bug report). Eventually,

Bug#267079: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686: T41p can't sleep with ACPI

2004-08-20 Thread jlquinn
Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 Version: 2.6.7-2 Severity: normal Attempting to put an IBM T41p to sleep does not work. The following chunk of kernel log shows why: Aug 20 03:10:09 localhost kernel: e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full D uplex Aug 20 03:10:12 localhost

Bug#267080: Fwd: Network misbehaviour on nforce3.

2004-08-20 Thread cyrille . dunant
Package: kernel Version: 2.6.8-1-amd64 On unstable, pure64. Upon boot, the hardware is recognised, wether - the 10/100 LAN, driver forcedeth - the 1000 LAN, driver e1000 Through DHCP the network is correctly setup. The after a variable, though short time (from 30 sec to 3 min) the

Re: Kernel Panic in kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 in jbd

2004-08-20 Thread Bharath Ramesh
* Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 06:37:13PM -0400, Bharath Ramesh wrote: I have 2.6.7 kernel on my Compaq laptop. I compiled the ndiswrapper downloading from sourcforge. But whenever I try to run ifup on my device I get a Kernel Panic. I am attaching

drm modules in kernel-2.4.27 are old

2004-08-20 Thread Krzysztof Krzyzaniak
I know, this is upstream problem, but drm (especialy most interested for me radeon.o) module is quite obsolete and ususable in my case. I use omnibook laptop and only with quite new radeon.o ( 1.9) module works suspending (standard apm option). Ok, you can say use 2.6.* but in 2.6 suspending

Re: Bug#267029: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc: Invalid link in /lib/modules/2.6.8-powerpc/

2004-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:53:55PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:39:54 +0200, Eugen Dedu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:07:57PM +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc Version: 2.6.8-1 Severity: minor

Bug#266996: NFORCE2: hda: lost interrupt

2004-08-20 Thread Andres Salomon
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:40:26 +0200, Philipp Kolmann wrote: Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7 Severity: normal Hi! I have a NFORCE2 based Athlon board installed and can't use the Debian -k7 Kernels since 2.6.7 because I get a lockup during boot: hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status 0x64

Bug#267014: I think it's a hardware bug

2004-08-20 Thread Mike Fedyk
Hi, Sorry for the premature bug report, but it looks like the problem was caused by a 32-bit PCI SCSI card in a 64-bit slot. I'll leave it to your discretion on closing these bugs. Mike

Re: Which 2.4 kernel-source for sarge?

2004-08-20 Thread Thiemo Seufer
dann frazier wrote: We need to come to an agreement about which kernel-source we will ship for sarge. According to http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianKernel, everyone w/ 2.4.26 has 2.4.27 except for powerpc (sparc is building). 2.4.26 has had more testing time - its used in d-i RC1.

Bug#266882: CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm volatile(fnclex ; fwait);

2004-08-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:20:17AM +0900, Horms wrote: tags 266882 + woody security Security Team, what is going on with respect to updating 2.4.18 in woody? There are numerous CAN entries outstanding. Joey has been working on it, and I have sent him what patches I had been able to collect.

Bug#261893: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-generic: Kernel bug at mm/slab.c:1530

2004-08-20 Thread Jan-Jaap van der Heijden
* Jan-Jaap van der Heijden wrote: With a stock 2.6.6-1-generic kernel it crashes as soon as it initilizes the SCSI controller. Can you please try the 2.6.7 packages, and report if they fix your problem (I suppose so)? http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel-image-2.6.7-alpha/ 2.6.7 doesn't lock up

Kernel 2.6.8 and reiserfs corruption

2004-08-20 Thread Axel Grau
I had an up-to-date installation of Debian unstable running the 2.4.26 kernel with reiserfs 3.6 on a Maxtor 6Y080L0 IDE drive, PIIX4 chipset (Dell OptiPlex GX1). I decided to give a try to the 2.6.8 kernel but it hung displaying the NVIDIA logo. After a few tries and hard reboots I found that the

Bug#267006: Bug#267014: I think it's a hardware bug

2004-08-20 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:29:50PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: Hi, Sorry for the premature bug report, but it looks like the problem was caused by a 32-bit PCI SCSI card in a 64-bit slot. 32-bit PCI cards should work without problems in 64-bit slots, though. -- Next the statesmen will invent

Bug#267006: Bug#267014: I think it's a hardware bug

2004-08-20 Thread Mike Fedyk
Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:29:50PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: Hi, Sorry for the premature bug report, but it looks like the problem was caused by a 32-bit PCI SCSI card in a 64-bit slot. 32-bit PCI cards should work without problems in 64-bit slots, though. That's what