If this can help the problem seems related to CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G (if enabled).
See http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/1353.html .
I've not verified this information.
Bye.
Hi,
Horms writes:
I would like to upload kernel-latest-2.4-i386 to d.o shortly.
If there are any objections now would be a most excellent time
to make them.
I still think the meta packages should be created by the current
source package, and sent a message with my main two points of
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:37:56AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
Hi,
Horms writes:
I would like to upload kernel-latest-2.4-i386 to d.o shortly.
If there are any objections now would be a most excellent time
to make them.
I still think the meta packages should be created by
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-2.dsc
kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64_2.6.8-2.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6-amd64-xeon_2.6.8-2_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-xeon_2.6.8-2_i386.deb
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:54:49 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in new upstream releases
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
Sven Luther writes:
BTW, I believe that the only reason this works for you is because you don't
make uploads of older packages. The meta packages are right now provided by
both 2.6.7-5 and 2.6.8-1, and the latest are being used because they where
uploaded last. If you reuploaded a
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:43:46AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
Do you mean that distributing the diffs with lines like
-# a line that it was decided not to distribute
-# another line that shouldn't be distributed
-# yet another one
is similar to distributing lines that it was decided not
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 08:05:22AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I hope that this arrangements is acceptable by everyone while still
helping at least users who are mostly interested in the code that Debian
does distributes. Hopefully these are most of the users.
What is the real problem ?
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:56:43AM -0400, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
* Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 06:37:13PM -0400, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
I have 2.6.7 kernel on my Compaq laptop. I compiled the ndiswrapper
downloading from sourcforge. But whenever I
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:29:53AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
Can you please try again with 2.6.8-1 and see if the bug has gone away?
I wrote:
My initial tests revealed that this problem is mostly gone with 2.6.8-1.
So I need to watch out to see if that happens again
and can be
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 05:28:17PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Package: kernel
Severity: wishlist
AFAIK, suspend to disk is currently not compiled in Debian
kernels (2.6).
So, this bug is merely aimed at recording that at least one guy is hoping
to see it so that he can use genuine
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 03:28:47PM -0400, Steaphan Greene wrote:
I've been frustrated for a while by the fact that debian doesn't seem to
have a kernel to support my router (which is a dual pentium-MMX)
out-of-the-box. I also notice that this seems to still be true (so far)
for sarge. While
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:19:00 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line #264380 kernel-source-2.6.7: tmpfs leaks mem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 04:51:52PM -0400, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
I tried installing ndiswrapper on my laptop and found that my computer
freezes soon. It seems like the new version of ndiswrapper is quite
stack hungry like the windows driver. I want to know how do I increase
my stack size of my
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 05:55:36PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
reassign 265363 kernel
bts retitle 265363 Cardbus doesn't work on ECS G50 Notebook
thanks
What cardbus card did you insert? Does it have a linux driver at all?
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 10:40:09PM -0400, Kristine Diana Daniels wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-1
Followup-For: Bug #267342
putting values less than or equal to 6 in
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_default_win_scale
resolves the nntp issue.
putting values less than
Quoting Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
swusp isn't really stable enough yet. Maybe for sarge+1
I wasn't hoping this for sarge, don't be afraid..:-)
So, sarge+1 is a good target, imho, provided this is added to kernel
compilation asap in order to get tested enough when we will release
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:29:53AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
Can you please try again with 2.6.8-1 and see if the bug has gone away?
I now know that it still there with 2.6.8-1.
ohci_hcd is still the culprit.
Unloading this module before a snooze helps.
pgpJBN5ejO5Dz.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi
It's a SMC 2435W. I've compiled and loaded the driver with success, but
it keeps waiting for cards to probe when the card is inserted.
the driver that claims to work with this card is acx100
http://acx100.sourceforge.net/
The model of the Notebook is G550 (and not G50).
If there is
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:08:21PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
swusp isn't really stable enough yet. Maybe for sarge+1
I wasn't hoping this for sarge, don't be afraid..:-)
So, sarge+1 is a good target, imho, provided this is added to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 250093 257631
Bug#250093: jedec_probe is too much verbose
Bug#257631: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686: jedec modules dumping lot of messages
Merged 250093 257631.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:58:59 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closed per audit trail
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
what does cat /proc/modules and dmesg say?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 147469 minor
Bug#147469: menuconfig: crash due to infinite recursion (gawk)
Bug#162132: kernel-source-2.4.19: awk segfault on make menuconfig to compile
kernel
Severity set to `minor'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
does this still happen with 2.6.8?
Does this still happen with a recent kernel?
Can you please retest with 2.4.27/2.6.{7,8}, we fixed some alpha pci
handling issue there.
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:41:24 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#258091: #258091 no cpufreq avaible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:47:45 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line #252234 kernel-image-2.6.6-1-686: smbfs corner case - pointer
error (and nautilus freeze)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:57:26 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line #217200 DAC960-driver doesn't use memory above 1 GB
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:52:27 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line #256468 xterm: utmp handling is broken for high pts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 266673 minor
Bug#266673: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686: Badness in i823650 module
Severity set to `minor'.
severity 266674 minor
Bug#266674: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686: Badness in vesafb module
Severity set to `minor'.
thanks
Stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 260163 +moreinfo
Bug#260163: no APM BIOS found on some notebook
Tags were: sid
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:55:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 04:20:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
* kernel-latest-2.4-i386
- This is a NEW package that provides the meta packages that were
previously provided by kernel-image-2.4.26-i386 and are currently
Christoph Hellwig:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 05:55:36PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
reassign 265363 kernel
bts retitle 265363 Cardbus doesn't work on ECS G50 Notebook
thanks
What cardbus card did you insert? Does it have a linux driver at all?
He claims that the lspci output did not
Hi,
thank you, Alvaro and Roberto, for your both work, helping to make this
possible!
Kind regards
Frederik Schueler
- Forwarded message from Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 06:32:17 -0400
From: Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Frederik Schüler [EMAIL
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-3.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-3.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8_2.6.8-3_all.deb
kernel-tree-2.6.8_2.6.8-3_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-3_all.deb
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:17:46PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
I just realized that having this package may add load to the security
team by increasing the number of packages they need to rebuild. Normally
a kernel-image update uses the same package name as the current version
(thus no new
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:48:26 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#266892: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:48:26 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#266731: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:48:26 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#257763: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:48:26 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255931: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.6.8_2.6.8-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.8/kernel-doc-2.6.8_2.6.8-3_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8_2.6.8-3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.8/kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8_2.6.8-3_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.8_2.6.8-3.diff.gz
to
Package: kernel
Severity: wishlist
Without support for SMP for 586 or lower machines, my only option is to
compile the kernel myself, or use only one of my CPUs. It would be
better if there were a 586-SMP kernel included with debian
out-of-the-box.
This is my first time using reportbug so
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Could it be possible OpenBSD doesn't properly deal with the tcp window
scaling changes in 2.6.8? (http://lwn.net/Articles/92727/)
Unless there is present in the path one of those broken
routers (mangling the window scale option), it's likely
something else. Also, nntp
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-1
Severity: normal
After installing kernel-2.6.8, I can no longer burn a CD or
DVD as a regular user. I have to be root. This is no good.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 02:14:58PM -0700, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Could it be possible OpenBSD doesn't properly deal with the tcp window
scaling changes in 2.6.8? (http://lwn.net/Articles/92727/)
Unless there is present in the path one of those broken
routers
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:14:58 -0700
Nivedita Singhvi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Could it be possible OpenBSD doesn't properly deal with the tcp window
scaling changes in 2.6.8? (http://lwn.net/Articles/92727/)
Unless there is present in the path one of those broken
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:09:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
At least for fai, they would need to rebuild anyway, because we are going with
2.6.8. but this is nothing a rebuild cannot fix.
I'm sure that's true for all of them; its just a matter of being able
to tell the maintainer what to
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:31:55PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 03:28:47PM -0400, Steaphan Greene wrote:
I've been frustrated for a while by the fact that debian doesn't seem to
have a kernel to support my router (which is a dual pentium-MMX)
out-of-the-box. I
50 matches
Mail list logo
