Bug#272029: FATX filesystem support

2004-09-19 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:38:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > tags 272029 +upstream > thanks > > Please get feature-patches merged upstream before bugging us, thanks. Upstream rejected them untill they're "a lot more commonly used", which can also be read as "supported in major distributio

Bug#272029: FATX filesystem support

2004-09-19 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:21:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:38:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > tags 272029 +upstream > > thanks > > > > Please get feature-patches merged upstream before bugging us, thanks. > > Upstream rejected them untill they're "a lot m

Processed: ingress bug

2004-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 271858 normal Bug#271858: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp: Kernel panics when network traffic starts Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#271858: ingress bug

2004-09-19 Thread Andres Salomon
severity 271858 normal thanks This is not an RC bug; it is an ingress bug, which should be easily avoided, and not relevant to most kernel users. On the topic of the actual bug, it appears that qdisc_priv(sch) in ingress_enqueue() is somehow returning NULL (which is being stored in %eax, and de

Re: 2.2 kernels and 2.2.26

2004-09-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-12 17:06]: > We currently have 2.2.25 (kernel-source-2.2.25) in the archive, while > 2.2.26 has been available for quite some time fixing some important > bugs (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/ChangeLog-2.2.26). > Can someone who cares about 2.2 please pac

Bug#272351: 2.2.25 has security issues, 2.2.26 available

2004-09-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: kernel-source-2.2.25 Severity: important Tags: security 2.2.26 fixes some security issues. I don't know how severe they are so I'm filing this bug as 'important' but it may just as well be RC. The 2.2.26 changelog from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/ChangeLog-2.2.26 is belo

Bug#272351: 2.2.25 has security issues, 2.2.26 available

2004-09-19 Thread Herbert Xu
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: kernel-source-2.2.25 > Severity: important > Tags: security > > 2.2.26 fixes some security issues. I don't know how severe they are > so I'm filing this bug as 'important' but it may just as well be RC. All of the security fixes in 2.2.26 ar

Re: 2.2 kernels and 2.2.26

2004-09-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-19 15:26]: > > We currently have 2.2.25 (kernel-source-2.2.25) in the archive, while > > 2.2.26 has been available for quite some time fixing some important > > bugs (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/ChangeLog-2.2.26). > > Can someone who cares about 2.2 pl

Processed: fixed in -3

2004-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 271858 + sarge Bug#271858: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp: Kernel panics when network traffic starts There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#255449: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6-k7: cpio complains while installing)

2004-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:42:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed already has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#266629: related bug

2004-09-19 Thread Andres Salomon
I'm betting #259056 is related to this. I'll research whether this is a kernel or module-init-tools bug later. -- Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#264240: not kernel-image's responsibility

2004-09-19 Thread Andres Salomon
reassign 264240 kernel-package severity 264240 wishlist retitle 264240 kernel-package: should warn for ide-scsi in lilo.conf thanks Reassigning as a wishlist bug for kernel-package; this is something Manoj can choose to implement, if he wishes. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

ƒp[ƒgƒ^ƒCƒ€LOVERS‚²“o˜^Ä‘—

2004-09-19 Thread reg
ƒp[ƒgƒ^ƒCƒ€LOVERS‚Ì‚²“o˜^ƒ[ƒ‹‚Å‚·Bˆê“x‚¨‘—‚肵‚Ü‚µ‚½‚ªÄ“x‚¨‘—‚è‚¢‚½‚µ‚Ü‚·B ‰º‹L‚̃AƒhƒŒƒX‚©‚ç“o˜^‚𑱂¯‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢B http://www.parttime-lovers.com/ez/reg2.htm?uid=15819 ¡ŒãA‚±‚Ì“o˜^Šm”Fƒ[ƒ‹‚ª•s•K—v‚È•û‚͉º‹L‚̃AƒhƒŒƒX‚ɃAƒNƒZƒX‚µ‚ĉº‚³‚¢B http://www.parttime-lovers.com/touroku_del.htm?u

Processed: this bug will be closed if more information is not provided

2004-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 268167 + moreinfo Bug#268167: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: limits ethernet connections to 100 Kbit/s There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: not kernel-image's responsibility

2004-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 264240 kernel-package Bug#264240: Kernel-image 2.6 should give a warning if append ide-scsi is present in lilo.conf Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6-386' to `kernel-package'. > severity 264240 wishlist Bug#264240: Kernel-image

Bug#271858: fixed in -3

2004-09-19 Thread Andres Salomon
tags 271858 + sarge thanks Actually, it looks like this was fixed in -3; please try it out and confirm. -2 is still in testing, as it's presumably waiting for kernel- latest to make it through NEW. -- Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed me

Bug#272342: Won't boot with my usual kernel options (ACPI related)

2004-09-19 Thread Bill Tomlinson
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp Version: 2.6.8-3 With kernel 2.6.8-2, I had to use these kernel options to get it to boot: "acpi=off noapic nolapic". But it worked just fine with those options (it's an always-on server, so I don't need power management features). But when I upgraded to 2.

Bug#272351: marked as done (2.2.25 has security issues, 2.2.26 available)

2004-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:50:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272351: 2.2.25 has security issues, 2.2.26 available has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t