On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Karsten Merker wrote:
With your netboot image the keyboard works fine. The install
breaks at a later stage though. This is due to the module-udebs
in the archive having unresolved symbols with your kernel,
which results in an unloadable scsi driver module.
Regards,
Karsten
Unfor
Rejected: kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10-2.dsc refers to
kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in
the pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10-2.dsc
kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10-2.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.10_2.6.10-2_all.deb
kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10-2_all.deb
kernel-tree-2.6.10_2.6.10-2_all.deb
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386
Version: 2.6.8-10
vesafb needs to be loaded very early in the boot process (according to
vesafb.c, while the kernel is still in real mode).
But because it is a configured as a module, it is only loaded when the
boot process is basically complete. The module then
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-11
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
I was having problems with some pendrivers and then I looked by a
fix. I did this patch using Fedora kernel as source and tested it. Worked
really fine.
Please, apply it in next upload.
-- System Information:
De
Hi all,
I'm not sure whether this is the right list to post to...
After the last apt-get update && apt-get upgrade I can't configure my
kernel any more:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.8# make gconfig
scripts/kconfig/gconf arch/i386/Kconfig
(gconf:6136): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkla
clone 289155 -1
reassign -1 kernel-source-2.4.27
thanks
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I haven't found a patch for 2.6 yet, a patch for 2.4 is available in
> the 2.4 Bitkeeper branch.
Cloning a bug for 2.4 since it's also vulnerable.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 289155 -1
Bug#289155: CAN-2004-1235: uselib() privilege escalation
Bug 289155 cloned as bug 289202.
> reassign -1 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#289202: CAN-2004-1235: uselib() privilege escalation
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.8' to `
Rejected: Rejected: kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.9-2_powerpc.deb: old version
(100) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: Rejected: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-2_all.deb: old version
(2.6.9-3) in unstable >= new version (2.6.9-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected:
Hi,
I'm new to linux and i'm almost finished setting up my debian workstation.
Background information: from kernel 2.4 --> 2.6 the s-ata device changes
from hde to sda. Which is in my grub menu.lst:
title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.9
root(hd0,2)
kernel /boot/vmlin
Hey, and while we're at it.. more fun!
I had 2.6.10 all ready and everything. damnit. Oh well, I guess there
will be 2.6.8, 2.6.9, and 2.6.10 uploaded today.
--
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
grsecurity 2.1.0 release / Linux Kernel advisories
-
tags 289155 +pending
thanks
* Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Paul Starzetz from iSec Security Research has discovered a local
> root exploit in the Linux kernel:
Already fixed in svn.
Norbert
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 289155 +pending
Bug#289155: CAN-2004-1235: uselib() privilege escalation
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
I have Slackware
kernel kernels 2.4.6, kernel 2.6.10 and the ethernet card 3c589.
Under 2.4 6 everything goes well and I recive a good IP from dhcp.
Under 2.6.10 I receive different IP and it doesn't work properly. I can
not get acess to Internet.
So, if someone has a solution I would appreciate
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> submitter 261121 !
Bug#261121: Keep ion3 out of testing
Changed Bug submitter from Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Per Olofsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 266617 !
Bug#2
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Paul Starzetz from iSec Security Research has discovered a local root exploit in
the Linux kernel:
> Locally exploitable flaws have been found in the Linux
> binary format loaders' use
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:25:41PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote:
> > > Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm
> > > volatile("fnclex ; fwait");)
severity 285017 important
package 285017 kernel-source-2.4.27
package 286402 kernel-source-2.4.27
merge 286402 285017
thanks
Hi,
these two bugs seem to be the same so I am merging them.
--
Horms
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:44:50AM -0500, A Costa wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686
> Ver
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 285017 important
Bug#285017: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my
modem
Severity set to `important'.
> package 285017 kernel-source-2.4.27
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: 285017 kernel-source-2.4.27
> package 28640
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:33:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Version: 2.4.27-6
> Severity: important
>
> The fix for CAN-2004-1056, added in 2.6.8-11, also applies to 2.4 - however,
> I don't think it will compile, because 2.4 doesn't define the
> LOCK_TEST_WITH_RETURN() in dr
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:15:51 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably
> get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10
> k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim
> for uploa
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 10:44:41AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> bts severity 287085 important
> bts reassign 287085 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> bts tag 287085 upstream
> thanks
>
> On Jan 07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > reassign 287085 module-init-tools
> > Bug#287085: k
bts severity 287085 important
bts reassign 287085 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bts tag 287085 upstream
thanks
On Jan 07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > reassign 287085 module-init-tools
> Bug#287085: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386: apt-get upgrade fails to configure on
> amd64 - depmo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 286462
Bug#286462: FTBFS in experimental
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> severity 288583 important
Bug#288583: kernel-source
Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:25:41PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote:
> > > > Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm
> > > > vol
Hello Marek, ...
It seems that the asfs patch doesn't want to build correctly on 2.6.10
kernels, and Christoph is now wanting to kick it out of the debian
kernel-source package because of that.
I wonder if you could get a look and fix the issue (please CC questions you
may have to linux-fsdevel a
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:03:25PM -0800, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sven> Well, we don't care, since the daily built are on
> Sven> people.debian.org (gluck).
>
> I learned that too late to help, but now I know!
>
> >> The machi
reassign 287085 module-init-tools
thanks
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 04:33:56PM +, Dan Leitner wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Horms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 03:39 AM
> > To: 'Dan Leitner', [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: 'dann frazier'
> > Subjec
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:10:33PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:39:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > there was an ABI change in this release, but I am not sure
> > that is the problem that you are seeing. It seems to be
> > AMD64 specific. Dannf, perhaps you have some ideas.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 287085 module-init-tools
Bug#287085: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386: apt-get upgrade fails to configure on
amd64 - depmod exited with return value 1
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386' to `module-init-tools'.
> thanks
Stopping
control 288279 +pending
thanks
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:01:03AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:18:57PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> > Package: kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27
> > Version: 2.4.27-7
> > Severity: important
> >
> > The debian kernel patches are installed with permissi
"Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> Well, we don't care, since the daily built are on
Sven> people.debian.org (gluck).
I learned that too late to help, but now I know!
>> The machine is running from my previous hacked install, but I
>> really want to try o
32 matches
Mail list logo
