On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:44:04PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> thanks for your bug report. Sorry for the long delay in replying.
> Long inbox...
>
> I took a quick look into this. Unfortunately I can't find dm_snapshot.c
> in either the kernel tree or the evms source code tree, nor anything
> that look
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
> > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
> kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
> removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have
> an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, no
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:06:25AM +0100, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
> I have installed kernel-image-2.6-686-smp and booted and it works :)
Excellent, I am glad to hear that.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
I have installed kernel-image-2.6-686-smp and booted and it works :)
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Alex,
thanks for your bug report. Sorry for the long delay in replying.
Long inbox...
I took a quick look into this. Unfortunately I can't find dm_snapshot.c
in either the kernel tree or the evms source code tree, nor anything
that looks like it. Do you have any idea where it is?
I also took
Dear kernel maintainers,
I wrote:
> I have just compiled and am now running the kernel-source-2.6.10-5
> package (available for Debian unstable) on my Dell PowerEdge
> SC1425 server running Debian Sarge. I can confirm that the Debian
> version of 2.6.10 does NOT fix the RTC problem with hwclock.
Hi,
I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and
kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages
removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have
an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to
speak up. Below is a list of packages that I no
Dear Kernel maintainers,
I have just compiled and am now running the kernel-source-2.6.10-5
package (available for Debian unstable) on my Dell PowerEdge SC1425
server running Debian Sarge. I can confirm that the Debian version
of 2.6.10 does NOT fix the RTC problem with hwclock.
Yours truly,
Jo
Accepted:
kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32-smp_42_sparc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-sparc/kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32-smp_42_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32_42_sparc.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-latest-2.4-sparc/kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32_42_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4-sparc64-smp_42_spa
I also have this problem with the 2.6.10 DeMuDi kernel.
(Also the system sometimes becomes locked up especially while running "jackd -R"
but that probably is unrelated.)
Cheers,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
kernel-latest-2.4-sparc_42_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-latest-2.4-sparc_42.dsc
kernel-latest-2.4-sparc_42.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4-sparc32_42_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4-sparc32_42_sparc.deb
kernel-image-2.4-sparc32-smp_42_sparc.deb
kern
Ok, the important distinction to draw is security fixes that involve ABI
changes vs those that do not. As long as the ABI remains the same, it's
relatively easy to get fixed debs in, and to update the installer to use
them. Not even a lot of coordination is required, we can update each
arch indepen
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-5
Severity: wishlist
Enabling the reiserfs extended attributes would be greatly appreciated, i see
that this has been enabled on ext2/3. I do not know if this can break anything,
but please consider it.
Thank You,
Jonathan
-- System Information:
De
I installed with a netinst CD 20050218, but failed with linux26,
as the kernel did not recognise the CD drive. 2.4 did work, but
changing the system from 2.4 to 2.6 with SATA is tedious (both
/etc/fstab and /boot/grub/menu.lst have to changed manually and
making an error can lead to an unbootable
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.6.8-power3-smp_2.6.8-11_powerpc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8/kernel-build-2.6.8-power3-smp_2.6.8-11_powerpc.deb
kernel-build-2.6.8-power3_2.6.8-11_powerpc.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8/kernel-build-2.6.8-power3_2.6.8-11_powerpc.deb
ke
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8_2.6.8-11_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8_2.6.8-11.dsc
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8_2.6.8-11.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.8_2.6.8-11_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6.8-power3_2.6.8-11_powerpc.deb
kernel-
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: critical
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-10-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k
Hi Joey,
I am looking for some advice on releasing 2.4.27-9, or not as
the case may be.
There are a few security bugs that have been found recently
that are patched. Everything else is pretty minor. The changelog
is below for your reference. And have been checking, and there
do not seem to be any
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:56:20PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> can you please try kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp from sid
> http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64/kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb
I've tried that, and I have the same probl
Quoting Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks, looks good, though I think the Makefile portion of the patch
> should be as follows. I am in the process of some rebuilds to confirm
> this. I have CCed the Zwane Mwakikamo and LKML so this reaches the right
> eyes.
>
> --
> Horms
>
> diff -Nru a/arch/i
--
FWIW, I had what appears to be the same problem with 2.6.9 kernel, and it
worked fine on
2.6.6. So likely something changed either in 2.6.8 -> 2.6.9 or in
2.6.7 -> 2.6.8
Examining the 2.6.8 changelog finds this:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[PATCH] FAT: don't use "utf8" charset and NLS_DEFAU
Further information:
The system in question is a Celestica A8440 [1].
If I pass "nomce" to the kernel boot options, to bypass Machine Check
Exceptions, then I can almost get the kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8-smp
to a working state. It hangs on loading the "Real Time Clock Driver
v1.12" but I can
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:30:23PM +0100, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> Arghhh! I've seen the same thing (delay loop hang). It was solved
> (tyan motherboard) just disabling "ACPI v2.0" in the BIOS. But Your
> Mileage May Vary... maybe other ACPI options in bios, or kernel
> options like nolapic, noa
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:40:55PM +, Edward Miller wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-8
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> The 2.6 kernel series has, since 2.6.5, had a fix for an erroneous timer
> override present in many BIOSes in nforce[23] chipsets. The 2.4 series
On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > $ dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/net/hotplug.dev
> > But this is a net subsystem script, so it's not supposed to be run for a
> > character device.
> Can you trace the first call of hotplug and see what happens?
If I create a tap device with "uml_switch -tap t
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:26:53AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [...]
> > those warnings are almost certainly harmless.
> > However, can you give this patch a whril?
> > It should make them go away.
> >
> > --
> > Horms
> >
>
> This patch is reversed but o
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:18:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > $ dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/net/hotplug.dev
> But this is a net subsystem script, so it's not supposed to be run for a
> character device.
Can you trace the first call of hotplug and see wha
Quoting Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> those warnings are almost certainly harmless.
> However, can you give this patch a whril?
> It should make them go away.
>
> --
> Horms
>
This patch is reversed but otherwise effective!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ dpkg -S /etc/dev.d/net/hotplug.dev
But this is a net subsystem script, so it's not supposed to be run for a
character device.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > udev names tun net/tun, and as it now thinks it is a net device, calls
> > hotplug tun
> What makes you think that udev calls hotplug? This is not how I know it
> works.
This makes m
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-5
Severity: important
I am experiencing the same symptoms as bugs #291029, #290964 and #291940. This
time the device
is just an ordinary eth0 (happens to be a prism54) - no tunnels, bridges or
anything. I even
removed all IPv6- and tunneling support
tag 296700 pending
thanks
Added to 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 (2.6.9 is dead).
Investigating 2.4.27.
As always, thanks for the bug report.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 296700 pending
Bug#296700: [CAN-2005-0204]: AMD64, allows local users to write to privileged
IO ports via OUTS instruction
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:12:57 +0900, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:54:31AM +0100, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
> > I'd like to upgrade my kernel to kernel-image-2.6-686-smp for my Debian
> > testing.
> > But I have been told that the tg3 driver is broken.
> > Do you kno
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:43:14AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> I looked over the 2.6.10 changelogs and do not see this being either
> fixed, or that particular file being changed. Although I do see that it
> has changed slightly, the piece that is replaced in this patch is not
> replaced here. A
On Feb 24, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> udev names tun net/tun, and as it now thinks it is a net device, calls
> hotplug tun
What makes you think that udev calls hotplug? This is not how I know it
works.
> In udev thinking tun is a net device?
I don't think so, see the difference between t
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:54:31AM +0100, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
> I'd like to upgrade my kernel to kernel-image-2.6-686-smp for my Debian
> testing.
>
> But I have been told that the tg3 driver is broken.
>
> Do you know if it is fixed?
Broken is in the eye of the beholder.
Some firmware w
(new) kernel-build-2.6.10-power3-smp_2.6.10-3_powerpc.deb optional devel
build infrastructure for kernel version 2.6.10-power3-smp
.
Together with kernel-headers-2.6.10, this package provides the
infrastructure for building additional modules for 2.6.10-power3-smp.
(new) kernel-build-2.6.10-powe
I'd like to upgrade my kernel to kernel-image-2.6-686-smp for my Debian testing.
But I have been told that the tg3 driver is broken.
Do you know if it is fixed?
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10_2.6.10-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10_2.6.10-3.dsc
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10_2.6.10-3.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.6.10_2.6.10-3_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6.10-power3_2.6.10-3_powerpc.deb
ke
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:57:39PM +, Edward Miller wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-8
> Severity: normal
>
> The fix for CAN-2004-1056 (Fix insufficient locking checks in DRM code)
> (see #285563) introduced the filp parameter in the
> LOCK_TEST_WITH_RETURN macro in dr
Here's the lspci; lspci -n output.
I eventually got the system to work, but now (weeks later) I'm not
sure what I did to fix it.
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-760 MP [IGD4-2P]
System Controller (rev 11)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-760 MP
44 matches
Mail list logo
