On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Are there debian machines
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to announce kernel-source and kernel-image-i386 2.4.27-10.
> This is an update to 2.4.27-9, which is currently in unstable.
> And I would like to propose it as the a candidate for sarge rc1
>
> (Note: rc1, _not_ rc0, wh
Hi Adam,
Could you please test whether this bug is still present when you use the
latest 2.6.8 kernels in testing/unstable?
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 6:50, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:40:27PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Yes, I have a very simple and basic hint which anybody doing kernel
> > bugs triage should know: if the kernel crashes, it's a kernel bug.
>
> That is certainly true. But as the udev m
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:27:36PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> i was asked to send a summary out of that session,
> anyway please correct me if it's wrong:
>
> * d-k in testing is frozen.
> that means that current debian-installer rc3,
> and testing kernels are the kernel for sarge.
>
>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:40:27PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> reassign 304013 kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
> thanks
>
> On Apr 12, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > not many, i'll reassign to the udev maintainer,
> > who may have related questions and/or hints.
> Yes, I have a very
tags 303844 +upstream
tags 303844 +wontfix
tags 303844 +patch
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:24:57AM -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
> Horms wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:36:57AM -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Jacques Goldberg writes the patch submitted with this bugreport is a
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 303844 +upstream
Bug#303844: resolve "device xxx is grabbed by another driver"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tags 303844 +wontfix
Bug#303844: resolve "device xxx is grabbed by another driver"
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: wontfi
I'm also seeing this, under 2.6.11 and again it's spamd as the major
culprit. Restarting spamd every few days seems to free up large amounts of
ram.
tombstone:/# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:514636 497168 17468 0
hi all,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:05:02AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> received another bug report concerning TI irq routing.
> your patch don't seem to fix this PCI1250 rev2.
> you'll find the bug report at
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=303550
>
> note that the pre
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
Version: 2.6.8-15
Severity: normal
Kernel 2.6 has no ipsec0..ipsecn virtual devices.
For the firewall package Shorewall to work properly with ipsec traffic
the ipt_policy.ko netfilter module is missing!! Without this it cannot
properly work to setup IPSEC-tunnels.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 304248 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-generic
Bug#304248: install report - alpha 500au - first soft-reboot fails
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
`kernel-image-2.4.27-2-generic'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, maximilian attems wrote:
> i was asked to send a summary out of that session,
> anyway please correct me if it's wrong:
forgot to include the log:
http://neualius.turmzimmer.net/~aba/kernel-irc-log
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Horms wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:36:57AM -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
Jacques Goldberg writes the patch submitted with this bugreport is a
poor solution to the problem and should not be used.
I request the bugreport be closed; a solution is in the works in the
mainline kernel.
Per
i was asked to send a summary out of that session,
anyway please correct me if it's wrong:
* d-k in testing is frozen.
that means that current debian-installer rc3,
and testing kernels are the kernel for sarge.
* security updates via t-p-u
in order to get better coverage the non abi breakin
could you please try a newer version of the debian-installer like the rc3
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
thanks a lot four your feedback.
a++ maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags #245012 wontfix
Bug#245012: initrd does not work with XFS root on powerpc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
reassign 304013 kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
thanks
On Apr 12, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not many, i'll reassign to the udev maintainer,
> who may have related questions and/or hints.
Yes, I have a very simple and basic hint which anybody doing kernel bugs
triage should know: if t
reassign 304013 udev
thanks
[please do not drop bug repot in cc, thanks. ;)]
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> > strange system call, can you reproduce it with 2.6.10 or 2.6.11 kernels
> > from unstable?
>
> I'm beginning to think it's udev which made the system crash. Last weekend
>
I tested the newer version of this package, version 2.6.8-11 on this machine
as well but I get the identical results.
--
Daniel Nilsson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Forwarded message from Teemu Likonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Teemu Likonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#304013: syslog: kernel BUG at mm/shmem.c:608! / kernel:
invalid operand: [#1]
Date: Tue, 12
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 304013 udev
Bug#304013: syslog: kernel BUG at mm/shmem.c:608! / kernel: invalid operand:
[#1]
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7' to `udev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
FYI,
I found a handful of 2.6.11.7 patches that seem to be needed for 2.6.8
and aren't already there. I'll try and clean up the patch names and
changelog and get them into svn tomorrow - build seems fine
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:11:54PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:59:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:38:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > I may be able to provide a pegasos box to who
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:36:57AM -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
> Jacques Goldberg writes the patch submitted with this bugreport is a
> poor solution to the problem and should not be used.
> I request the bugreport be closed; a solution is in the works in the
> mainline kernel.
Perhaps it woul
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:59:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:38:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I may be able to provide a pegasos box to whoever decides to take over
> > > this
> > > burden, but can't
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:41:53PM -0700, james wrote:
> Hi,
>
> make sure you havce the crc32 module compiled and then:
>
> $modprobe crc32
Seems strange that modprobe doesn't pull in crc32
as being required for sis900.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 05:30:08PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> In the recent DPL campaign a lot of attention was focused on the lack of
> communication withing Debian. My proposal is one way to somewhat improve
> it within a kernel team, for what it's worth. If people insist on doing it
> th
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 04:12:57PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it would be really useful if whoever is planning the next
> kernel-source upload would give at least 24-hour advance warning by
> e-mailing debian-kernel that such upload is planned. That would give
> people a ch
29 matches
Mail list logo
