Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 303498 pending
Bug#303498: CAN-2005-0749: Elf Binary Loading Local DoS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
The fix for CAN-2005-0749 has been applied in SVN for both 2.6.8 and
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
2.6.11 and
tag 303498 pending
The fix for CAN-2005-0749 has been applied in SVN for both 2.6.8 and
2.6.11 and should appear in the next release. This problem seems
to have been reported in both Bug #303498 and #301799.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:31:53PM +1000, Arthur Gruzauskas wrote:
Package: kernel-source
Version: 2.6.11-1
On compiling kernel-source-2.6.11-1 with or without
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11-3, using current make-kpkg, as i have
since kernel 2.4 days, i get the following error.
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:09:55PM +0200, Emil Nowak wrote:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: normal
When I try to play some sound for example with command utility 'play':
$ play somesound.wav
it is played multiple times.
Playing video files for example with
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Proof of consept: http://www.frsirt.com/exploits/20050322.k-rad.c.php
This would work on other NON-SMP kernels too. Makes kernel images
unusable for multiuser system.
-- System Information:
Debian
Hi,
why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file
via /proc?
Please CC me, I am not on this list.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps
and
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
Version: 2.6.11-3
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Hi there,
We have a moderately-loaded NFS server running Debian/Sarge with the
stock kernel 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 (the current Debian binary deb). It
serves around 10 NFS client connections from a Solaris 8 box. For
what it's worth, the exported filesystems are also being shared
simultaneously via
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:42:25AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file
via /proc?
It's in /boot instead
--
Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
* Nico Golde wrote:
why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file via
/proc?
Because the file is available in '/boot/config-$(uname -r)'.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 06.05 10:42, Nico Golde wrote:
why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file
via /proc?
For 2.4 kernels, it requires patch that is not in debian distribution.
Also, as some people already mentioned it, debian kernels come with
/boot/config-version, so you do not need to have
On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:15:29 +1000, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Could you please elaborate? I personally think it is pretty damn
hard for kernel-package to cope with all situations, and that in
many ways the kernel packates updloaded to d.o are not the general
case, so yes we make some use
Hello Matus,
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-06 17:45]:
On 06.05 10:42, Nico Golde wrote:
why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file
via /proc?
For 2.4 kernels, it requires patch that is not in debian distribution.
Shure.
Sorry, I forgot to mention
Package: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8
Version: 103
Severity: normal
The description of this package states that it will always depend on
the latest 2.6 kernel image available. However, the current unstable
version depends on kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-k8, when it should
clearly depend on
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:40:37AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
i guess with the kernel-image-2.6.11 that problem disappears?
Yes
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.
15 matches
Mail list logo