ALERT: Third and FINAL Notification:
Although you were not accepted initially, we are now happy to present you with
three deals from two different brokers.
Remember, there is absolutely No commitment required on your part and past
credit is a non-issue.
Please validate your information with ou
ALERT: Third and FINAL Notification:
Although you were not accepted initially, we are now happy to present you with
three deals from two different brokers.
Remember, there is absolutely No commitment required on your part and past
credit is a non-issue.
Please validate your information with ou
ALERT: Third and FINAL Notification:
Although you were not accepted initially, we are now happy to present you with
three deals from two different brokers.
Remember, there is absolutely No commitment required on your part and past
credit is a non-issue.
Please validate your information with ou
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:13:46AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > It should be removed from unstable if no one steps up to maintain it; it
> > needs to be repackaged more or less from scratch in order to migrate to 2.6
> > and I w
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:05:10PM +0100, George B. wrote:
> On 8/18/05, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yes, it should do just that.
>
> Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc-3.3, or default to gcc-4.0?
Sorry for being unclear. If you build kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-11
then it
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 08:53 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:12:39PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > linux-2.6 deprecates kernel-latest, afaict. It provides the same binary
> > packages as transition packages that depend on the s/kernel/linux/
> > equivalents.
>
> They also
With help from waldi I have done some additional tests for this issue
yesterday and today. Here are the main results:
- the problem is still there if Sarge's 'ip' is used instead of the
busybox version
- the problem is still there if the new linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
(2.6.12-5) kernel is used
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:55:12AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:08:52PM -0400, Paul Kuliniewicz wrote:
> > linux-headers-2.6.12-1 ships recursive symlinks in
> > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1/arch/i386, as shown:
>
> I don't know where you get this package, but the ve
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 10:54 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > 3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security
> > >- source packages not prepared yet. I hope to do that today
> >
> >I am working on this now
>
>- source, i386 and powerpc images are now up on
> http://packages.vergen
Hello,
AMD64 builds for both i386 and AMD64 are available here:
http://amd64.debian.net/~fs/2.6.8-16sarge1/
best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 323757 linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686
Bug#323757: ieee80211-source: does not build against kernel 2.6.12-1-686
Bug reassigned from package `ieee80211-source' to `linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
We haven't been introduced... :)
Jasmine prefers black men over white men because she says black guys treat her
like a queen!
http://civahysavoje.com/view.cgi?s=aaa&m=IHJIID.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd
--
Best regards, Danielle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 18:51 +0900, Horms wrote:
[...]
> Obviously the security team needs to be involved. However
> CCing them on emails seems largely fruitless. Do you have
> any ideas on how to work with them to make this release happen?
> It is becoming quite frustrating to say the least.
>
M
The build went much further on my sparc pbuilder than it did on the
sparc buildd. This does not seem to be due to a known sbuild/pbuilder
difference, or the known ld issue with the woody kernel vore is
running. It could be a difference in versions of the build
dependancies, but since my build fai
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:01:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323788: kernel-source-2.6.11: Won't build with gcc-4.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 323724 linux-2.6
Bug#323724: [powerpc] linux-image-2.6.12.1-powerpc64: does not boot on
PowerMac7,2
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.12.1-powerpc64'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.12.1-powerpc64' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
St
Of whom do I have the honour? :)
Thiis was Trixxi first time taking black dick. Can she handle it? She straddled
that monster pole and grinded up and down with orgasmic pain then enjoyment!
http://civahysavoje.com/view.cgi?s=aaa&m=BJBCB.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd
--
Best regards, Darrell
--
To UNSUB
On 8/18/05, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc-3.3, or default to gcc-4.0?
Package: linux-image-2.6.12.1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: important
while trying to boot 2.6.12 on a g5, it get to the following screen dump
and the boot stops there. the fan starts spinning, and the machine
reboots (after about the time it took me to type the following lines,
including
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-7
Severity: normal
make-kpkg fails thus:
CC [M] drivers/i2c/i2c-core.o
In file included from drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:29:
include/linux/i2c.h:58: error: array type has incomplete element type
include/linux/i2c.h:197: error: array type has incomplete el
Hello,
Since the 2.6.12 powerpc kernel in the archive now support 64bit kernels,
thanks to the work of the toolchain guys with regard to biarch on ppc, i have
uploaded kernel .udebs and triggered new reorganised daily builds of the sid
debian-installer images.
I was forced to disable the floppy b
The problem is, there is still a symlink from a previous version there if
you upgrade.
Suppose we start from a system without any linux-headers-2.6.12-1* package.
Then we install the -2 version (which used to be in unstable) of
linux-headers-2.6.12-1 and the -686 one:
# dpkg -i linux-headers-2.6
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:55:24AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Horms,
>
> The plans you've described all sound good. I'm glad to see some
> movement on the question of kernel updates for sarge.
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:21PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> > Back to releases. After 2.4.27
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:08:26 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:49:38AM +0200, Stefan Berder wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > This is not just a make-kpkg problem.
> >
> > I'm getting some problems in building 2.4.29 kernel woody packages
> > for
>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:49:38AM +0200, Stefan Berder wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is not just a make-kpkg problem.
>
> I'm getting some problems in building 2.4.29 kernel woody packages for
^
Arg, there is probably not much we can do, why do
Hi Horms,
The plans you've described all sound good. I'm glad to see some
movement on the question of kernel updates for sarge.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:21PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Back to releases. After 2.4.27-11 is out, which should be very soon,
> I would like to take what we have in SV
Hi all,
This is not just a make-kpkg problem.
I'm getting some problems in building 2.4.29 kernel woody packages for
different architectures in the same time. I built a debian/rules file
that looks quite like the one I found in kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-2.4.27
for woody, but I can't manage in getti
2005-08-12, p keltezéssel 10.50-kor Maximilian Attems ezt írta:
> reassign 321403 linux-2.6
> thanks
>
> this seems to be a known upstream bug:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4773
>
> unfortunately i don't see a resolution yet.
> could you test latest -rc6 from linus and followup th
28 matches
Mail list logo
