On Aug 29, Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
rebooted. udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
not 2.6.12. preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.
If you think you have a better idea, feel free
On Aug 29, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can this be resolved by some dependancies and conflicts?
This is supposed to be a FAQ: packages cannot have explicit dependencies
on kernel packages.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Aug 29, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you really need to make such a mess about this ?
Yes, but thank you for asking about it.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:22:59AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 29, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can this be resolved by some dependancies and conflicts?
This is supposed to be a FAQ: packages cannot have explicit dependencies
on kernel packages.
While doing breakage things in the
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:46:49AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Package: udev,linux-2.6
Severity: grave
udev = 0.060-1 and kernels = 2.6.12 should enter testing at the same
time.
If udev is first it will refuse to be upgraded (or install but disable
itself on new installs), if the kernel is
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:08:17PM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
rebooted. udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
not 2.6.12. preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.
Indeed, this whole situation is a
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:27:09AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 29, Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my case, I have installed a 2.6.12 kernel image, but not yet
rebooted. udev refuses to install because the RUNNING kernel is 2.6.11
not 2.6.12. preinst is a poor place for
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:04:18AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 29, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, badly worded maybe :), but i think your RC bug on the kernel without
prior discussion may have been somewhat rude.
It was discussed with vorlon.
Vorlon is not the kernel
On Aug 29, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was discussed with vorlon.
Vorlon is not the kernel team however.
But he is the one who decides when packages should or should not go in
testing, which is what this bug is about.
What do you think of having two udev packages, which are
On Aug 29, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a compatibility udev maybe ? Also you have to remember, that some people
It could not work in an acceptable way.
Please read the huge past threads about this.
like or need to run two sets of kernels.
And I want a pony.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Aug 29, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, badly worded maybe :), but i think your RC bug on the kernel without
prior discussion may have been somewhat rude.
It was discussed with vorlon.
Anyway, i was expecting some explanation about the reason why this mess
happened, especially
reassign 325484 udev
retitle 325484 udev lacks sarge-etch upgrade path
thanks
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:46:49AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
udev = 0.060-1 and kernels = 2.6.12 should enter testing at the same
time.
You have to provide a proper sarge-etch upgrade path. This bug is the
sign of
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:40:47AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
BTW, was 2.6.13 already released ? Or any idea when it will be ?
Also, i believe we need a 2.6.12-6 upload which fix the remaining problems and
can go into sarge.
Do we have any plans regarding that ?
The following
Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
The following tasks needs to be done for 2.6.13:
- Merge of the current trees.
- Config updates.
- initrd-tools needs to loose devfs usage.
Bastian
I'm not shure whether my information is correct, but AFAIK is pcmcia-cs
obsoleted with 2.6.13 and one
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, was 2.6.13 already released ? Or any idea when it will be ?
The mail arrived 2:17 MEST.
Also, i believe we need a 2.6.12-6 upload which fix the remaining problems and
can go into sarge.
Do we have any plans regarding that ?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:26:09AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
reassign 325484 udev
retitle 325484 udev lacks sarge-etch upgrade path
thanks
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:46:49AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
udev = 0.060-1 and kernels = 2.6.12 should enter testing at the same
time.
You have
On Monday 29 August 2005 12:35, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 29, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In effect this means that any user having udev installed will have to
put udev on hold.
No, if the kernel has not been upgraded yet then preinst will fail.
Hmm. Won't that fail the whole
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, was 2.6.13 already released ? Or any idea when it will be ?
The mail arrived 2:17 MEST.
Also, i believe we need a 2.6.12-6 upload which fix the remaining
Hi,
I just installed kernel-image-2.6.11-9-em64t-p4 but unfortunately the kernel doesn't have the module for Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5721 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 11).
Anyone can assist.
Thank you__Do You
Hello,
you need kernel-nonfree-modules, to be found here:
http://213.178.77.236/kernel/amd64/
or use 2.6.12 wich has tg3 support added back thanks to broadcom
relicensing the driver.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:13:40AM -0700, mynullvoid wrote:
I just installed
Hi!
I am sorry to tell you that the patches did not work with the current
kernel-source-2.6.8 (2.6.8-16)!
I tried with both gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 and allways got the following
error message from make-kpkg:
CC [M] drivers/input/gameport/ns558.o
drivers/input/gameport/ns558.c: In function
Bastian Blank wrote:
The following tasks needs to be done for 2.6.13:
- Merge of the current trees.
- Config updates.
- initrd-tools needs to loose devfs usage.
One thing I'd like to add for the wishlist:
Please evaluate just how broken ATAPI-over-SATA really is right now and
consider
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 23:09 +0100, Thom May wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-mckinley
Severity: important
Version: 2.6.12-5
The xfs module fails to load with an error about invalid module format.
modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting xfs (/lib/modules...): Invalid module
format
The only
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:27 +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
you need kernel-nonfree-modules, to be found here:
http://213.178.77.236/kernel/amd64/
or use 2.6.12 wich has tg3 support added back thanks to broadcom
relicensing the driver.
Yes, 2.6.11 is no longer maintained, so
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, was 2.6.13 already released ? Or any idea when it will be ?
The mail arrived 2:17 MEST.
Also, i believe we need a 2.6.12-6 upload which fix the remaining
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
Package: realtime-lsm
Version: 0.1.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The 2.6.8-2 kernel (which is the default on sarge) does not
have CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX enabled, which means it is not
possible to use this
From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
- initrd-tools needs to loose devfs usage.
BTW, isn't it time to switch to initramfs ?
Does it work?
Supposedly, best time now to find out, don't you think ?
I saw that ubuntu use
Hi,
I can't find linux-image for em64t, what should I have for my source.list, currently I am running sid with main contrib non-free.
Regardsdann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:27 +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hello, you need kernel-nonfree-modules, to be found
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
The following tasks needs to be done for 2.6.13:
- Merge of the current trees.
- Config updates.
- initrd-tools needs to loose devfs usage.
One thing I'd like to add for the wishlist:
Please
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:26:22PM +0200, Guenter Geiger wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
Package: realtime-lsm
Version: 0.1.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The 2.6.8-2 kernel (which is the default on sarge) does not
have
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 323999 +sarge
Bug#323999: Dangling Symlink in /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-386/source in
kernel-image-2.6.8-16
There were no tags set.
Bug#268971: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp: dangling link
Bug#270577: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: Source symlink points to
tag 324202 +patch
thanks
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:40:59PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: minor
Tag: patch sid
Please include the following config snippet on all archs:
CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR=y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 324202 +patch
Bug#324202: include ReiserFS ACL support in 2.6.12 kernel
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:40:01AM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
- initrd-tools needs to loose devfs usage.
BTW, isn't it time to switch to initramfs ?
Does it work?
Supposedly,
34 matches
Mail list logo
