kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686: oops in hiddev

2005-09-09 Thread Arno Peters
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 Version: 2.6.8-16 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Current setup: server protected by APC UPS. Monitoring of UPC status using apcupsd package via USB. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address f05c7670 printing

Bug#327115: Floppy unexpected interrupt

2005-09-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, Luca PERSICO wrote: I tried out your distro on a laptop PC (Pentium III 900MHz); it is not a brand PC, it is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] PC, thus it is quite easy for me to have trouble installing GNU/Linux on it, so that till now the only distro that has been acceptable has

Bug#327355: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: amverify w/ ide-tape causes bug, then kernel panic

2005-09-09 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 Version: 2.6.12-6 Severity: important amverify started, then shortly later (after the first thing was done verifying, I think) these managed to make it to syslog. As you can see, it got the bug message, then rebooted itself a few minutes later: Sep 9 01:12:27

Re: [Secure-testing-team] DTSA for 2.6.8 and 2.4.27

2005-09-09 Thread Micah Anderson
Moritz Muehlenhoff schrieb am Friday, den 09. September 2005: Micah Anderson wrote: Neither of these advisories is a typical DTSA, as we normally we only do advisories for things that are blocked from reaching testing by some other issue, but I think that it would be good to do these two

Re: [Secure-testing-team] DTSA for 2.6.8 and 2.4.27

2005-09-09 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Micah Anderson wrote: Micah Anderson wrote: Neither of these advisories is a typical DTSA, as we normally we only do advisories for things that are blocked from reaching testing by some other issue, but I think that it would be good to do these two advisories because of the sheer

Re: DTSA for 2.6.8 and 2.4.27

2005-09-09 Thread Micah Anderson
Horms schrieb am Friday, den 09. September 2005: On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:17:25PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: Hi, I think it would be a good idea to get a DTSA (Debian Testing Security Advisory) issued for 2.4.27 and 2.6.8. That seems fine to me, at a glance. Though there have

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.12-6_m68k.changes

2005-09-09 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.12-6_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb linux-image-amiga_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb

linux-2.6_2.6.12-6_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2005-09-09 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.12-6_m68k.deb to

Re: acct v3 support

2005-09-09 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:57:47PM -0700, Ryan Lovett wrote: Are there plans to have more architectures enable the newer accounting file format via CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3 ? I'm actually only interested in amd64. $ egrep 'CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3=y|linux-2.6-2.6.12/debian/arch/' \

Re: standardizing on a language

2005-09-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:23:30AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: Naturally, we'll still need to have things that end up being run on the user's system in perl or shell (shell for things that can't use or are too simplistic perl, and perl for other things). We are

Bug#312255: Problems booting kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7

2005-09-09 Thread Alessandro Di Rubbo
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7 Version: 2.6.8-16 Followup-For: Bug #312255 If I boot the system using kernel 2.6, after the message Starting GNOME DISPLAY MANAGER: gdm, a messy image appears, similar to my desktop background: except for the mouse, everything is blocked. To go on I have to

how to detect a debian kernel from `uname -r`

2005-09-09 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
Hello everyone, I'm trying to detect a debian kernel from uname -r. My suggestion would be to add a -debian at the end of the localversion of kernels _patched_/modified by debian, and to leave the localversion completely _empty_ (or an unchanged localversion compared to the mainline defconfig)

Re: acct v3 support

2005-09-09 Thread Ryan Lovett
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:50:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: This breaks the accounting format, so it's a change that needs a lot of thought. Okay, thanks for considering this. The file http://www.physik3.uni-rostock.de/tim/kernel/utils/acct/readme.txt mentions: Note that the --raw

Bug#327416: CAN-2005-2490/CAN-2005-2492: Two sendmsg() related vulnerabilites

2005-09-09 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: important Tags: security [Severity important only, as amd64 is not yet officially in the archive] These patches were posted as part of the stable review cycle on linux-kernel, they're probably available in git already. CAN-2005-2490: (local privilege escalation on

Bug#327432: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32: upgrading from 2.2 kernel deadlocks with libc upgrade

2005-09-09 Thread Marc Horowitz
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32 Version: 2.4.27-9 Severity: important I had an old sparc which was running a 2.2.20 kernel (yes, old) and libc6 2.2.5-11.5. I tried to upgrade it (apt-get install dist-upgrade) and it choked. In particular, the kernel depends on a newer version of libc:

Bug#327432: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32: upgrading from 2.2 kernel deadlocks with libc upgrade

2005-09-09 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Marc Horowitz wrote: I had an old sparc which was running a 2.2.20 kernel (yes, old) and libc6 2.2.5-11.5. I tried to upgrade it (apt-get install dist-upgrade) and it choked. In particular, the kernel depends on a newer version of libc: This is a known issue, arising

Bug#327432: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32: upgrading from 2.2 kernel deadlocks with libc upgrade

2005-09-09 Thread Marc Horowitz
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Marc Horowitz wrote: I had an old sparc which was running a 2.2.20 kernel (yes, old) and libc6 2.2.5-11.5. I tried to upgrade it (apt-get install dist-upgrade) and it choked. In particular, the kernel depends on a newer version

Bug#327436: kernel segv after SMB server (buffalo linkstation, running linux) was reconfigured

2005-09-09 Thread Christian Grothoff
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 Version: 2.6.8-14 Severity: minor After reconfiguration of permissions on a mounted SMB volume, the Kernel decided to segfault (system continued to run, blocking processes that were accessing the affected volume). Here is what /var/log/messages had to

Bug#327432: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32: upgrading from 2.2 kernel deadlocks with libc upgrade

2005-09-09 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Marc Horowitz wrote: Shouldn't the system somehow warn me I have a gun aimed at my foot *before* I pull the trigger? Marc Well, it did prevent you from installing a broken combination of things. And there is a documented workaround. Anyway, nothing can be

Re: how to detect a debian kernel from `uname -r`

2005-09-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:16:38PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: Hello everyone, I'm trying to detect a debian kernel from uname -r. My suggestion would be to add a -debian at the end of the localversion of kernels _patched_/modified by debian, and to leave the localversion completely

Re: acct v3 support

2005-09-09 Thread Horms
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:50:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:57:47PM -0700, Ryan Lovett wrote: Are there plans to have more architectures enable the newer accounting file format via CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3 ? I'm actually only interested in amd64. $

Re: [Secure-testing-team] DTSA for 2.6.8 and 2.4.27

2005-09-09 Thread Horms
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:05:58AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: Moritz Muehlenhoff schrieb am Friday, den 09. September 2005: Micah Anderson wrote: Neither of these advisories is a typical DTSA, as we normally we only do advisories for things that are blocked from reaching testing by

Re: [Secure-testing-team] DTSA for 2.6.8 and 2.4.27

2005-09-09 Thread Horms
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:49:18PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Micah Anderson wrote: I think it would be a good idea to get a DTSA (Debian Testing Security Advisory) issued for 2.4.27 and 2.6.8. Neither of these advisories is a typical DTSA, as we normally we only do

Re: DTSA for 2.6.8 and 2.4.27

2005-09-09 Thread Horms
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:30:39AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: Horms schrieb am Friday, den 09. September 2005: On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:17:25PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: Hi, I think it would be a good idea to get a DTSA (Debian Testing Security Advisory) issued for 2.4.27