Package: kernel-source-2.4.27-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can successfully apt-get the kernel-source-2.4.27 package using
testing, but when trying to bunzip it bunzip2 gives a Data Integrity
Error while decompressing
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 330003 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#330003: kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27-11
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.4.27-11'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.4.27-11' to `kernel-source-2.4.27'.
> --
Stopping processing h
On 2005-09-25 Fenrir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27-11
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> I can successfully apt-get the kernel-source-2.4.27 package using
> testing, but when trying to bunzip it bunzip2 gives a Data Integrity
> Error while de
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 10:02:21PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27-11
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> I can successfully apt-get the kernel-source-2.4.27 package using
> testing, but when trying to bunzip it bunzip2 gives a Data Integrity
> Error
Hi,
Matthew Wilcox has advised me on IRC that #329888 (FTBS on hppa)
is in fact a kernel problem, not a bin utills problem.
He's going to reasign the bug and write something useful there for
us, but in a nutshell the fix is
http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/linux-2.6/arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S.diff?
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:26:02PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Matthew Wilcox has advised me on IRC that #329888 (FTBS on hppa)
> is in fact a kernel problem, not a bin utills problem.
>
> He's going to reasign the bug and write something useful there for
> us, but in a nutshell the fix is
>
>
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:26:02PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
It would be time to upload 2.6.13-1 to experimental also, or wait for -9 to
enter testing and go for 2.6.13-1 upload then ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:36:12AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> The current state of d-i in unstable (and hopefully soon in testing)
> seems to be nearly releasable now to me. Most remaining issues only
> prevent some arches from being releasable yet.
Joey, what are the estimated schedule for a relea
Hi,
I've just recompiled kernel 2.6.8 to move siimage to a module and remove the initrd functionality.
Everything works fine except for sshd which now is bouncing connects
just responding with a "connection closed" error. I've tried from a
remote machine on the same subnet and from the local mach
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: important
Under linux kernel 2.6.8-2-686-smp "hciconfig" reports exactly what I
expect, namely:
hci0: Type: USB
BD Address: 00:07:61:19:85:CC ACL MTU: 192:8 SCO MTU: 64:8
UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN
RX bytes:1218112 acl:70613
dmesg output:
Linux version 2.6.12-1-686-smp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.0.2
20050821 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-6)) #1SMP Tue Sep 6 15:52:07 UTC 2005
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a
On 9/24/05, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:12:27AM -0400, Ben Aisen wrote:
> > > Package: initrd-tools
> > > Version: 0.1.82
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Tags: patch
> > >
> > > *** Please type your report belo
Package: linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686
Severity: minor
Version: 2.6.12-6
A module collection that just uses:
@$(MAKE) -C $(KERNEL_SOURCES) SUBDIRS=$(shell pwd) modules_install
to install its kernel modules will try to put its output in
/lib/modules/2.6.12/extra
instead of
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/ex
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 04:17:58PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:26:02PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Matthew Wilcox has advised me on IRC that #329888 (FTBS on hppa)
> > is in fact a kernel problem, not a bin utills problem.
> >
> > He's going to reasign the bug a
Please keep the bug report address in the cc: list on replies.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:56:55AM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
> On 9/25/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 10:02:21PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
> > > Package: kernel-source-2.4.27-11
> > > Severity: grave
>
Hi,
From your last message to the bug I understand that kernel 2.6.10 works
fine on your machine. Currently we have 2.6.12 both in testing and
unstable, 2.6.8 is in stable only and stable is in the maintenance mode
which means we are only fixing security bugs. As such, we can't do much
about
Hello,
This bug report has been opened for 275 days now. Sorry that we could not take
better care of it in the past, but situation has hopefully has improved to the
better with new kernels. Please send a message to the bug with more details if
the described problems are still present, otherwis
Hello,
I see that you have reported this bug to bugzilla.kernel.org as 4904 [0].
The solution which has been committed to git on August 4th involves
setting the value of HPET_EMULATE_RTC to yes if HPET_TIMER and RTC are
configured. I guess we could have enabled that too, however currently
HPE
Hi,
Could you please try booting the latest kernel with pci=routeirq and/or
acpi=noirq boot options and see if it makes any difference? That would
allow to narrow the problem somewhat.
Thanks,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgp
The md5 hash of the bz2 archive matches. Not sure what that hash of the package is supposed to be though.On 9/25/05, Steve Langasek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Please keep the bug report address in the cc: list on replies.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:56:55AM -0700, Fenrir wrote:> On 9/25/05, Steve L
reassign 329422 kernel-package
thanks
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:17:48AM -0400, Joe Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:10:47PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Could you please send your reply to the bug,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Oops, didn't realize Reply-To wasn't set. Here it is:
Thanks, an e
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:53:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:36:01PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Ok, looks like people seem to want python more; I'll start rewriting
> > my tools to be in python, and working on the common lib stuff.
>
> Make sure to write a one pa
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:09:17PM +0530, shyam hirurkar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am setting up mysql server on hardware raid level 1 ( Mirror) . I am able
> to install the base with one primery and swap as logical on 72,4 GB Hard
> disk.
>
> Below are my details:
>
> Kernel 2.6.8 i386
> Server co
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 01:22:42AM +0200, Miernik wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Miernik wrote:
> > Package: kernel
> > Followup-For: Bug #259031
> >
> > When I try to run fbtv I get this:
> >
> > jaworz:~# fbtv -v
> > using linux console font "/usr/share/consolefonts/lat1-16.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:08:39AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > Ok, that makes sense. Let me know if the build completes and if so
> > I'll add it to the tree.
>
> Build completed. Kernel seems ok.
Thanks,
I put your fix into the tree, it seems to be upstream,
but looks like it was
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 04:56:24PM +0300, Nikos Ntarmos wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:30:25AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > The problem that you see is a patch that was included in 2.4.27-11
> > (the current version in sid), though it isn't built for amd64.
> >
> > Could you see if
tag 329614 +patches
thanks
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:29:26AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.82
> Severity: normal
>
> If I am in /boot and I run mkinitrd -o foo 2.4.27, then I expect it to
> output to a file foo in the current directory. Instead it writes the
> ou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 329422 kernel-package
Bug#329422: No warnings when uninstalling kernel package
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686' to `kernel-package'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 329614 +patches
Unknown tag/s: patches.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n et
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 323173 2.6.12-3
Bug#323173: CAN-2005-245[89]: Two vulnerabilities in the kernel's zlib
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.12-3, send any further explanations to
Moritz Muehl
linux-2.6_2.6.12-7_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-7_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-7_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-7_m68k.deb
linux-image-amiga_2.6.12-7_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6-amiga_2.6.12-7_
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 09:09:55PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
> The md5 hash of the bz2 archive matches. Not sure what that hash of the
> package is supposed to be though.
Well, that's not a great answer, it means that you're getting Data Integrity
Errors on a known-good archive, and they aren't reprodu
Rejected: no source found for linux-2.6 2.6.12-7
(linux-image-2.6.12-1-mac_2.6.12-7_m68k.deb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-2.6 2.6.12-7
(linux-headers-2.6-hp_2.6.12-7_m68k.deb).
Rejected: no source found for linux-2.6 2.6.12-7
(linux-headers-2.6.12-1-mac_2.6.12-7_m68k.deb).
Rejected: no
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:57:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:53:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:36:01PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > Ok, looks like people seem to want python more; I'll start rewriting
> > > my tools to be in python, and wo
I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to not
have it require any further backports.
My current patch is attached; I need to figure out what was actually added
to kernel-package wrt mkvmlinuz that powerpc might need. Is there any other
arch-specific stuff that I might be
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name
Version Description
+++-==-==-===
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:28:01AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to not
> have it require any further backports.
As discussed on irc, this is useless non-sense. The new kernel-package is
needed on powerpc, and the alternative is to
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:29:53PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
> uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name Version Description
> +++-==
Hm... how odd, never had the problem with the kernel packages before,
but that fixed it. Thanks for all the time, and sorry for the
trouble.On 9/25/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:29:53PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold> | St
Hi Manoj,
Sven Luther has prepared an update of kernel-package that
fixes some minor problems that prevent the sarge version
from being able to compile linux-2.6, which we would
like to get included in volatile.
The package, and its changes are here, though you
will have to ask Sven about the det
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:34:11PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi Manoj,
>
> Sven Luther has prepared an update of kernel-package that
> fixes some minor problems that prevent the sarge version
> from being able to compile linux-2.6, which we would
> like to get included in volatile.
>
> The package, a
41 matches
Mail list logo
