On 10/26/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:23:17AM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
> > On 10/26/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:10:55AM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > When suspend to ram, the master volum
reopen 328534
thanks
This bug needs to be reopened in view of the new information. Apparently,
our 2.6.12-10 kernel, which includes the backported fix for the dpt_i2o
SCSI driver still oopses. Also, it has been reported that 2.6.13 that
should include all the upstream fixes hangs during dpt_i2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 328534
Bug#328534: Kernel panic on Adaptec 2100S on boot
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 03:26:52PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:24:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > $ apt-cache show linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
> > Description: Debian patches to version 2.6.12 of the Linux ker
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:24:03AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
> Severity: wishlist
>
> $ apt-cache show linux-patch-debian-2.6.12
> Description: Debian patches to version 2.6.12 of the Linux kernel
> ...
> linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz from the Debia
How i can move my kernel if i have authorization.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:52:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:31:42AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
> > Version: 2.6.12-10
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I suspect this may have something to do with
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cg
On Oct 26, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to clarify, udevd gets a bunch of events and tries to
> serialise them into modprobe calls, right? Do you think there
There is no serialization, only some throttling (IIRC it tries to run up
to 10 child processes in parallel).
> is any chance it
Hi Gerd, hello Dann !
I yesterday told you, to give a reply of your clues.
Yes, great , it works ! I did not know, that the module "bttv" now has the
opportunity to give additional parameters. Loading bttv with
additional parameters "type=10 pll=1 tuner=5" works great !
So, the bug was no bug an
mercredi 26 octobre, vers 9h, Maximilian Attems déclara :
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:52:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:31:42AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
> > > Version: 2.6.12-10
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> >
On Tue, October 25, 2005 10:13 pm, Erik van Konijnenburg said:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:09:06PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>> I've been able to setup an almost-working evms box (at least evms_query
>> reports useful data).
>>
>> I tried following Erik's suggestions and also implemented part o
Hello!
>
http://client.linux-nfs.org/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.12/linux-2.6.12-43-dirent_fix.dif
> >
> > This should normally suffice to fix the SGI problem.
>
> Thanks, I'll confine subseqent discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> as debian packaging issues don't need to be on lkml.
That's fine with me - for
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:57:30PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> reopen 328534
> thanks
>
> This bug needs to be reopened in view of the new information. Apparently,
> our 2.6.12-10 kernel, which includes the backported fix for the dpt_i2o
> SCSI driver still oopses. Also, it has been reported th
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335505: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.37
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335801: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.37
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
initramfs-tools_0.37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.37.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.37.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.37_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.37.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.37.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.37.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.37.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.37_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.37_all.deb
Announcing to debian-deve
yaird_0.0.11-9_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yaird_0.0.11-9.dsc
yaird_0.0.11-9.diff.gz
yaird_0.0.11-9_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:17:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335264: fixed in yaird 0.0.11-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:17:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335601: fixed in yaird 0.0.11-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Accepted:
yaird_0.0.11-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-9.diff.gz
yaird_0.0.11-9.dsc
to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-9.dsc
yaird_0.0.11-9_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-9_powerpc.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 335264 335601
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:10:55 +0200
Bin Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When suspend to ram, the master volume of alsa is turned off and
> sometimes down to 0. I have this error message:
> localhost kernel: failed to set volume
Could this perhaps b
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:35:19PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is the issue described below already on your radar screen? I couldn't
> find it in the relevant files. AFAICT, no CVE name has been assigned.
Its the first I've seen of it, but that doesn't mean much.
Which GIT tree is the commit
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: normal
On this Samsung P10 laptop, pressing Fn+F2 opens an in-screen display
that shows the battery status. Using the kernel 2.6.12-1-686, the
system is thereafter locked up and must be rebooted. This worked
correctly in the previous
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 05:34:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 05:16:12PM +0200, Simon Morlat wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Yes, the table is in the drivers themselves.
> > Great. The best place for that.
> > > See the 'modalias' file in
> > > the usb device directory for what s
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:37:52PM +0100, George B. wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: important
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been having the same problem on 3 firewall boxes: after a certain
> amount of time (days, weeks) the hard drives will either go into read
>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:19:24PM -0400, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.12
> Version: 2.6.12-10
> Severity: minor
>
>
> Attached is a small patch that fixes this potential minor confusion.
Aaron, isn't it wonderful how people seize the opportunity
for confusion.
Andrew, I'm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335733 +upstream
Bug#335733: linux-source-2.6.12: README.gz doesn't mention bzip2 source tarball
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
On Oct 26, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... come to think of it, that's what I use automout for. It could be
> removable media, then.
>
> Anyway, I can't reproduce it anymore, since 8 days ago:
> daemon.log.0:Oct 18 00:47:44 khazad-dum udevd[14729]: get_netlink_msg:
On Oct 26 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 26, Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oct 25 16:34:21 olgas udevd[1109]: get_netlink_msg: no ACTION in
> > payload found, skip event 'mount'
>
> Kernel brokeness? Is some other user space application sending
> bogus events to the netlink s
On Oct 26 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I see it on mounts caused by automount. I don't see it on mounts
> caused by mount. So, we have one possible culprit.
I see it with manual mounting of removable media (e.g., CDs).
No automount or autofs here.
Hope this helps as a data point
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Oct 26 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > I see it on mounts caused by automount. I don't see it on mounts
> > caused by mount. So, we have one possible culprit.
>
> I see it with manual mounting of removable media (e.g., CDs).
Hmm... com
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 01:09:20PM -0300, Eduardo Trápani wrote:
> I tried to install the ppc64 version and at the end of the installation I
> had this error message:
>
> You already have a NoLOADER configuration in /etc/.conf
> Install a boot block using the existing /etc/.conf? [Yes]
> There wa
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.14_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc5_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc5-itanium_2.6.13+2.6.14
kernel-image-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-itanium_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-itanium_2.6.13
On Oct 26, md wrote:
> > Anyway, I can't reproduce it anymore, since 8 days ago:
> > daemon.log.0:Oct 18 00:47:44 khazad-dum udevd[14729]: get_netlink_msg: no
> > ACTION in payload found, skip event 'umount'
> I have since learnt that these events are generated by the kernel.
> Why they are broken
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 18:31 +0400, my_mail wrote:
> Hello debian-kernel,
>
> The /boot/grub/menu.lst it contain 16 loading positions.
> Problem:
> grub not understand default=16. After reboot grub was offer first
> position.
>
> How I must set 16 position as default?
debian-user@lists.debian.org
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.14_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc5_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc5-386_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5
10.001 seems to fail to build linux-2.6
2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4-0experimental.1 on i386.
Its folating around in incoming/experimental.
I'll get a log of what goes wrong some time soon.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Alle 22:13, martedì 25 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
> The properties look OK to find devices, but don't yet provide enough
> information to decide whether to load raid0/raid5.
We need to implement a deeper plugins support for this to happen.
> The crude fix is
> to just load them always ... M
Alle 20:09, martedì 25 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
> I've been able to setup an almost-working evms box (at least evms_query
> reports useful data).
You have to boot from a emvs volume to have a proper evms box, or to look at
it from an evms enabled cd-rom, but I think you already saw that.
> I t
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0exp
linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.14_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc5_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc5-386_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.changes: a file with
this name already exists in the New directory.
Rejected: linux-image-2.6-686_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb file
already exists in the New directory.
Rejected:
linux-headers-2.6.14-rc5-686-smp_2.6.13+2.6
To whom it may concern,
Representing the trademark owner of the name "Stock
Maven" I am first writing to request that you stop
using the name and consider using an alternative that
would be satisfactory to both yourself and to the
trademark owner of "Stock Maven".
The owner of the name "Stock Mave
To whom it may concern,
Representing the trademark owner of the name "Stock
Maven" I am first writing to request that you stop
using the name and consider using an alternative that
would be satisfactory to both yourself and to the
trademark owner of "Stock Maven".
The owner of the name "Stock Mave
Alle 09:49, mercoledì 26 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
> Yes, that was my first implementation actually. But the Device Number in
> evms_query info doesn't match the real device maj/min and I really don't
> know which one might be useful when filtering with findByDevNo eg:
>
> # evms_query info /dev/
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:35:19PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Is the issue described below already on your radar screen? I couldn't
>> find it in the relevant files. AFAICT, no CVE name has been assigned.
>
> Its the first I've seen of it, but that doesn't mean much.
> Which GIT tree is th
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:25:38PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
[...]
> Yes, we need only to scan for plugins if we like.
we do! :) (aw, well at least I do)
> The list of all plugins needed is given by, in shell terms and with my system
> examples:
>
> # evms_query volumes | xargs -i evms_query
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:15:59PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
[...]
ah, discard my previous request for command output, this is enough for
me at teh moment :)
thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: linux-source-2.6.13
Version: 2.6.13-1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I tried compiling a laptop kernel from the linux-source-2.6.13 2.6.13-1.
Unlike the debian precompiled kernel I tried the most agressive
preemption option. The resulting kernel worked f
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:27:26PM +0200, Debian User wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.13
> Version: 2.6.13-1
> Severity: normal
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> I tried compiling a laptop kernel from the linux-source-2.6.13 2.6.13-1.
> Unlike the debian precompiled kerne
I understand Ralink are the only vendor to have a 54g wireless chipset
which does not require the host to upload (non-free) firmware.
Ralink have also released software and interface specs, and released a
driver under the GPL.
The Ralink RT2500 kernel module is included by default with the ke
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:23:33PM +0100, Nick Hill wrote:
> I understand Ralink are the only vendor to have a 54g wireless chipset
> which does not require the host to upload (non-free) firmware.
>
> Ralink have also released software and interface specs, and released a
> driver under the GPL.
>
> Your disks are failing, get new ones if you value your data.
I'm afraid I will have to disagree with you on this one. All of the
disks were brand new and the problem started showing up after a few
days/weeks after assembly.
Also, one of the firewalls had a different (3.5") drive in it before,
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-itanium-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-itanium_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-ita
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 15:05 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> ...
> UPD include/linux/compile.h
> CC init/version.o
> LD init/built-in.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> arch/parisc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `cpu_enable_irq':
> : undefined reference to `smp_send_all_nop'
> make[4]: *
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.13+2.6.
tags + upstream
thanks
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 22:27 +0200, Debian User wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.13
> Version: 2.6.13-1
> Severity: normal
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> I tried compiling a laptop kernel from the linux-source-2.6.13 2.6.13-1.
> Unlike the debian
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:23:20AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> didnt install for me on ibook dual usb (g3 500)
>
> see output... (im pretty sure its this 'unknown pci device'
> weve been hearing about)
>
> ---
>
> Selecting previously deselected package yaird.
> Unpacking yaird (from .../yaird
didnt install for me on ibook dual usb (g3 500)
see output... (im pretty sure its this 'unknown pci device'
weve been hearing about)
---
Selecting previously deselected package yaird.
Unpacking yaird (from .../yaird_0.0.11-8_powerpc.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 335934 + upstream
Bug#335934: linux-source-2.6.13: preemptive kernel (sometimes) doesnt suspend
to ram
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 23:31 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:23:33PM +0100, Nick Hill wrote:
> > I understand Ralink are the only vendor to have a 54g wireless chipset
> > which does not require the host to upload (non-free) firmware.
> >
> > Ralink have also released softwa
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:32:40PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 23:31 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:23:33PM +0100, Nick Hill wrote:
> > > I understand Ralink are the only vendor to have a 54g wireless chipset
> > > which does not require the host to
Nick Hill a écrit :
I understand Ralink are the only vendor to have a 54g wireless chipset
which does not require the host to upload (non-free) firmware.
Ralink have also released software and interface specs, and released a
driver under the GPL.
The Ralink RT2500 kernel module is included b
Package: mips-tools
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
When building mips-tools on all architectures that I tested (which were
sparc and i386) it doesn't include any binary:
Automatic build of linux-patch-2.6-mips_2.6.12-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
[...]
Build finished at 200
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: normal
If a USB modem (in my case a Motorola phone) is unplugged while the
cdc-acm module is managing a PPP connection, the kernel oopses. If,
however, you kill the ppp connection and _then_ unplug the modem, all
is well.
This is not a new problem,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:07:38AM +0400, SuperrrLeha wrote:
> How i can move my kernel if i have authorization.
This kind of question would be better asked on the debian-user mailing list.
In general, kernels are usually files kept in /boot, and boot-loaders
such as grub and lilo allow you to ch
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:51:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:32:40PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 23:31 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:23:33PM +0100, Nick Hill wrote:
> > > > I understand Ralink are the only vendor to
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:36:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Nick Hill a écrit :
> >I understand Ralink are the only vendor to have a 54g wireless chipset
> >which does not require the host to upload (non-free) firmware.
> >
> >Ralink have also released software and interface specs, and relea
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:08:09PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 15:05 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > ...
> > UPD include/linux/compile.h
> > CC init/version.o
> > LD init/built-in.o
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > arch/parisc/kernel/built-in.o: In function
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:04:45AM +0200, Ruediger Oberhage wrote:
> Hello!
>
> >
> http://client.linux-nfs.org/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.12/linux-2.6.12-43-dirent_fix.dif
> > >
> > > This should normally suffice to fix the SGI problem.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll confine subseqent discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:02:05AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:57:30PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > reopen 328534
> > thanks
> >
> > This bug needs to be reopened in view of the new information. Apparently,
> > our 2.6.12-10 kernel, which includes the backported fix f
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:52:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:31:42AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
> > > Version: 2.6.12-10
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Hello,
>
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:28:33PM +0100, Roger Gammans wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:37:43AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:55:17PM +0100, Roger Gammans wrote:
> > > More infomation I should have included the first time:
> > >
> > > IDE Controller
> > > Silic
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:42:46PM +0100, George B. wrote:
> >
> > Your disks are failing, get new ones if you value your data.
>
> I'm afraid I will have to disagree with you on this one. All of the
> disks were brand new and the problem started showing up after a few
> days/weeks after assembly.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:27:26PM +0200, Debian User wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.13
> Version: 2.6.13-1
> Severity: normal
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> I tried compiling a laptop kernel from the linux-source-2.6.13 2.6.13-1.
> Unlike the debian precompiled kerne
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:37:54AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 26, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just to clarify, udevd gets a bunch of events and tries to
> > serialise them into modprobe calls, right? Do you think there
> There is no serialization, only some throttling (IIRC it
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:35:14PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last week.
> Is anyone looking into it?
It's fixed in CVS.
I blame the person who took a snapshot before we went to -pa1 ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:35:14PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last week.
> > Is anyone looking into it?
>
> It's fixed in CVS.
Thanks
> I blame the person who took a snapshot before we wen
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Actually, I just poked around in there, as it seemed like
> everyone else was busy doing other things.
"in there"? Where?
> I'm happy for tips on how to choose pacehes, I'm really not that familiar
> with the pa development model.
-pa0 is
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:56:27PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 19:39 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * dann frazier:
> >
> > > Horms: I realize you might be somewhat out of the loop as to how we're
> > > abusing your directory tree; I'll catch you on IRC when you're back to
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:39:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:35:14PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > That looks a lot like the error I was seeing last week.
> > > Is anyone looking into it?
> >
> > It's fixed in C
tag 335733 + fixed-upstream
thanks
As per the mail below, this fix has entered upstream and
should appear in some subsequent release, I would guess 2.6.15 or 16.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: + readme-doesnt-mention-bzip2-source-tarball.patch added to -mm tree
To:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335733 + fixed-upstream
Bug#335733: linux-source-2.6.12: README.gz doesn't mention bzip2 source tarball
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
85 matches
Mail list logo
