Upgrading to kernel 2.6.14 solves this problem. At least inserting a
USB key creates an entry in /dev which can be mounted. The automount
stuff doesn't work in my installation, but I don't really mind.
Thanks!
Larry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On 12/3/05, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>No. Current uplash is in userspace.
> >>>
> >>>I work on Splashy that's another alternative and it works well. We'll
> >>>probably move it from experimental to sid soon.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Oh, then it was the x86/vesa only thingy ?
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-12_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-build-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-12_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386_2.4.27-12_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386_2.4.27-12_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-58
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:55:49PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> You need to set ARCH=ppc64 to build the powerpc64 flavour.
>
Thanks, now I think I see what's happening :-)
It's a little cumbersome having to special-case powerpc64 though.
Is my understanding correct that the need for specifying A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 342057 linux-2.6
Bug#342057: initramfs-tools: initrd fails to load BusLogic module on boot
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `linux-2.6'.
> tags 342057 upstream
Bug#342057: initramfs-tools: initrd fails to load BusLogic module o
reassign 342057 linux-2.6
tags 342057 upstream
stop
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote:
> After a test in vmware installing 2.6.14-4-686 using initramfs-tools, the
> system failed to reboot.
>
> AFAICT the initrd (udev?) failed to load the BusLogic module even though
> it is included in the
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:03:40AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Version: 2.6.14-1
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:32PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
> > particular arch (eg. kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-i386). This
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:50:02PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi kernel team,
>
> I'm trying to build an external module on powerpc. Builds against
> -powerpc and -powerpc-smp headers are working fine, but they fail
> for -ppc64 with an error about missing arch/ppc/Makefile:
>
> http://experimen
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:50:02PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi kernel team,
>
> I'm trying to build an external module on powerpc. Builds against
> -powerpc and -powerpc-smp headers are working fine, but they fail
> for -ppc64 with an error about missing arch/ppc/Makefile:
I meant -powerpc64 o
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.42.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.42.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.42.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.42.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.42_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.42_all.deb
Announcing to debian-deve
Hi kernel team,
I'm trying to build an external module on powerpc. Builds against
-powerpc and -powerpc-smp headers are working fine, but they fail
for -ppc64 with an error about missing arch/ppc/Makefile:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=loop-aes-modules&ver=3.1b%2B6%2B2&arch=powerpc&
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 06:47:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341162: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.42
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:58:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321964: linux-2.6: package that depends on all -headers
for $arch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: important
This bug is a bit weird :-)
Apparently the binaries in m68k -headers were built for i386.
This breaks builds of external modules as they try to execute eg.
scripts/basic/fixdep on m68k.
$ dpkg -x linux-headers-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-10_m
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.14-4
Severity: important
External module builds against ia64 headers currently fail in the
linker stage with an error about missing arch/ia64/module.lds.
Perhaps this is a reincarnation of #266804 ?
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=pwc&ver=10.0.9-1&arch=ia64
initramfs-tools_0.42_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.42.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.42.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.42_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:29:39PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:49:49PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:39:42PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > No, it is NOT possible to build things against this package.
> > baah, it is.
> > please tell
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:49:49PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:39:42PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:55:55PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > can we put that patch in?
> >
> > No, it is NOT possible to build things against this pac
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:49:49PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:39:42PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > No, it is NOT possible to build things against this package.
> baah, it is.
> please tell what is breaking because of the asm link?
The asm link may point to any
Following my other posts: Here is install report from another machine,
with exactly the same results. I've tried to reproduce as much debug
as I know. Let me know how can I help more.
[1] Install yaird first, then try install kernel. Failure log.
[2] During install, /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yaird log w
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:39:42PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:55:55PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > can we put that patch in?
>
> No, it is NOT possible to build things against this package.
baah, it is.
please tell what is breaking because of the asm link?
>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:55:55PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> can we put that patch in?
No, it is NOT possible to build things against this package.
> would unbreak klibc.
klibc is a userspace part, not a kernel modul. The headers packages are
there to build kernel modules against.
Basti
Package: linux-headers-2.6.15-rc4
Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc4-0experimental.1
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
The new header-packages for 2.6.15-rc4 are missing arch/i386/Makefile.cpu.
The symlink is there, at least, in linux-headers-2.6.15-rc4-k7, but
leads to a non-existant file.
This br
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339091 pending
Bug#339091: initramfs-tools: lacking documentation
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
tags 339091 pending
thanks
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005, David =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=A4rdeman ?= wrote:
> I hope this is sufficient:
>
yes! :)
> > i've included some small updates to it to match current state.
> > as it's late please proof read too ;-)
>
> I'll try to find time to proofread it later this we
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339091 - moreinfo
Bug#339091: initramfs-tools: lacking documentation
Tags were: moreinfo patch
Tags removed: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
tags 339091 - moreinfo
stop
maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> can you please confirem that your manpage was written under "PUBLIC
> DOMAIN" license as the initramfs-tools package?
I hope this is sufficient:
I, the creator of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This
27 matches
Mail list logo
