[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>- Kernel 2.6 is still a moving target...
And it will always be, so people should learn to deal with this.
>- Some hardware is only supported with 2.4, for example older laptops
> which need APM and don't work with ACPI. Also some non-i386 machines.
What abou
Here is a workaround:
http://www.linuxvar.it/index.php/ATI_e_Kernel_2.6.15
And the package:
http://xrunhprof.free.fr/debian/fglrx-kernel-src_8.21.7-1jerome_i386.deb
Regards,
Jerome
Holger Levsen wrote:
> * This is a blog entry I wanted to write for about six weeks now, but I=20
> was busy with other stuff. In December 2005 I got curious why 2.4.32
> wasn't packaged for Debian and investigated the situation a bit.
>
> There are several reasons why 2.4 is still in
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:30:04AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> - According to popcon, 6-7% of the i386 users have a kernel-2.4 image
> installed.
>
How much of those are using it out of pure inertai, ond how many really need
it ?
> * Of course there are some issues which need to b
Bonsoir Monsieur . Comment allez vous?Bien je le pense! je me nomme Mlle Selina Yankson je vis à Abidjan Côte D'Ivoire qui se trouve Afrique Occidentale.effectivement c'est moi qui vous es contacter et bien cela pour cause d'un problème que je désires vous confier.j'ai lo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 350325 -1
Bug#350325: Uninstallable on HPPA
Bug 350325 cloned as bug 350482.
> reassign -1 linux-2.6
Bug#350482: Uninstallable on HPPA
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle -1 [hppa] module xfs relocation o
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:21:34PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as some of you already knows I'm trying to add the "um" subarch to build
> UML kernels.
It seems I had some (partial) success in merging UML kernel build but I
needed some changes to the build scripts and there's still s
sorry for the long delay
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:30:26PM +0100, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:21:34PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hello,
> >
[...]
> > Any suggestion?
> >
>
> make mrproper
> make defconfig ARCH=um
> make menuconfig ARCH=um
> make-kpkg --arch=um kern
On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:51, Julien Louis wrote:
> I notice that xfs filesystem is unusable during installation, i've
> found in the log file those lines:
>
> Jan 28 20:55:24 modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting xfs
> (/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-parisc/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko): Invalid module
> format
> Ja
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Even though 2.4 is moving very slowly nowadays (mostly security updates,
> > very seldom new drivers are including), this is more work than needed,
> > because every fix needs to be backported to 2.4.27 (and 2.4.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 01:39:42PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Horms made a [2 presentation] about the kernel packaging in debian for
> > LCA
> > and gave two options: a.) support and backport fixes for 2.4.27 or b.)
> > go
> > with 2.4.32. Somehow he did not consider the option
On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:30, Holger Levsen [1] wrote:
> - it's not sensible to have powerpc and amd64 flavors, and probably
> others. So this kernel package will not be arch any. (Which is not
> really a problem, but unusual.)
Probably hppa, ia64 and also alpha won't need 2.4 f
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.48
Severity: normal
On my laptop, a Fujutsu P-2110 lifebook, if I use softwre suspend
(version 1; to disk), when resuming the initramfs loads ohci_hcd before
starting the resume process. When the hibernate program then tries to
load ohci_hcd (which does not show
Hi!
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060130 01:54]:
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:30, Holger Levsen [1] wrote:
>>- Some hardware is only supported with 2.4, for example older laptops
>> which need APM and don't work with ACPI. Also some non-i386 machines.
Are there any cases, where you
Repoke.
I think I'll go ahead and put this into our tree & revert if it causes
problems.
hey Bastian,
CAN-2004-0887 is fixed in our 2.6.8:
* [SECURITY] s390: Fix for local root exploit: Force user process back to
home space mode in space switch event exception handler. (CAN-2004-0887)
(
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:24:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have cloned the installation report to #350482 and reassigned that to
> the linux-2.6 source package for this issue.
>
> The user confirmed this issue is still there for 2.6.15. I'll leave it to
> kernel maintainers to determine if t
17 matches
Mail list logo