On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If modular-ide is the sole source of trouble here, then what worked in
2.6.14-4 and earlier?
The bugreports seem to indicate that things broke in 2.6.14-5 that
worked in 2.6.14-4. And it seems nothing related else than linux-2.6
changed then - not ya
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: important
Booting from 2.6.15-8 on a Thinkpad 770X causes grub to fail when
loading the kernel, with error
18: Selected cylinder exceeds maximum supported by BIOS
Downgrading to 2.6.15-7 solves the problem.
-- System Information:
De
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 08:01 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:54:33PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> > Okay, 0.53 is in testing now (maybe a day or two ago). But again, with
> > the new initramfs-tools unpacked (but not configured):
> >
> > Setting up udev (0.085
FYI: The status of the linux-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.15-7
Current version: 2.6.15-8
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Hi sergio. I found your email
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/02/msg00510.html
about adding support for pt880 ultra. My agp chipset is PT880ULTRA, but my
architecture is amd64. Your solution is based on via-agp kernel module, which
has i86_32 dependency. I tried to remove this depend
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:07:34 +0100
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 10 March 2006 15:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > If modular-ide is the sole source of trouble here, then what worked
> > in 2.6.14-4 and earlier?
>
> <=2.6.12 used initrd-tools and that must still contain the corr
On Friday 10 March 2006 15:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> If modular-ide is the sole source of trouble here, then what worked in
> 2.6.14-4 and earlier?
<=2.6.12 used initrd-tools and that must still contain the correct magic
to deal with this.
2.6.14 was the first kernel tested with yaird and ini
Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> That patch has been dropped starting with the release of 2.6.15-1
> Debian kernel packages, according to changelog.
I tested my 2.6.12 machine last night, and it does indeed require
ide-generic. My empirical results agree with your analysis.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Sven Luther wrote:
> That means that jonas's fear of breaking self-built kernels is vastly
> unfunded, and that he should remove those hacks, include a mention of
> the broken kernels in the README file, and maybe propose a fixed yaird
> to stable-proposed-updates or something.
yaird is not in st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:53:18 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > That patch has been dropped starting with the release of 2.6.15-1
> > > Debian kernel packages, accordi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 356172 initramfs-tools
Bug#356172: kernel 2.6.15 for 686 can't mount root fs
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `initramfs-tools'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 356172 linux-2.6
Bug#356172: kernel 2.6.15 for 686 can't mount root fs
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.15-686'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.15-686' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Package: kernel-image-2.6.15-686
(related packages: initramfs-tools)
Severity: critical
I've tried to submit this bug report using "reportbug" twice, but I have
a feeling it didn't go through since I didn't get a confirmation. But
I'm hoping my report will help someone solve the "IDE mess",
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > That patch has been dropped starting with the release of 2.6.15-1
> > Debian kernel packages, according to changelog.
>
> Yes. It is also noted as being dropped in 2.6.14-6.
>
> The first of my collected[1] Bugreports[2] indica
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Looks like the two days rest is getting irrelevant...)
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > What version of the kernel was this analysis done with? The
>
hi all,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:40:52PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:00:43PM +0100, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> > debian 2.6.15-8 doesn't resolve:
>
> did you try the version of experimental as indicated in the announce
> mail you were quoting?
see below
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:10:27AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:49:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Mmm. When this was happening, could you use and mount partition on this
> > > > device ?
> > > > And when doing so, do you know which of ide-generic or cmd64x wou
Package: linux-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #354995
Hello,
As the subject states, the bug has been fixed upstream in 2.6.16-rc5.
I have tested this kernel myself and the clock _no longer_ runs too
fast without passing 'noapic' or 'no_timer_check' parameter to the kernel.
The relevant excerpt from the 2
On Mar 09, Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see this bug was moved to linux-2.6. However, there is also a udev bug
> #350235 filed for the same problem. While it appears there is a major
> udev component (the UI always gets the heat), it also appears to be a
> kernel component as well si
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:49:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Mmm. When this was happening, could you use and mount partition on this
> > > device ?
> > > And when doing so, do you know which of ide-generic or cmd64x would be
> > > used to
> > > read the drive ?
> > Are you suggesting that
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:40:26AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:10:12AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I've done a little poking of my own at sysfs based on the comments in
> > > the yaird code. I can confirm that it is possible for a PCI IDE driver
> > > to be listed
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:10:12AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I've done a little poking of my own at sysfs based on the comments in
> > the yaird code. I can confirm that it is possible for a PCI IDE driver
> > to be listed as associated with a PCI device without actually being the
> > driver u
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:12:42AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:00:50AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > When ide-generic is included (it is loaded after all the native ide
> > modules), the kernel boots fine. The reason is that in the Debian
> > 2.6.8 sources the ide-generi
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:00:50AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> When ide-generic is included (it is loaded after all the native ide
> modules), the kernel boots fine. The reason is that in the Debian
> 2.6.8 sources the ide-generic initialization procedure contains the
> call to ide_scan_pcibus(),
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
What version of the kernel was this analysis done with? The workaround in
yaird is explicitly commented as existing for the benefit of older kernel
versions; can you assure us that this aspect of the driver design is
unchanged from 2.6.8 through 2.6.15?
25 matches
Mail list logo
