Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch

2006-03-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:28:12 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jonas believes it is more important to not break whatever the user > may do, rather than have good support for official kernels, No, I believe those use cases are equally important. I believe it is important for yaird to

Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch

2006-03-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:13:44AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:28:12 +0100 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > jonas believes it is more important to not break whatever the user > > That's what your patch was about, Sven: Relaxing the internal > logic of yair

Re: Duplicate flavor builds

2006-03-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:29:00PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Hi, > > I've run a test build of 2.6.16-rc6, using dists/trunk/linux-2.6. It > appears that each flavor gets built twice, which is a huge waste of > resources. First build is peformed during 'make-kpkg build', second one - > during

Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch

2006-03-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:13:42 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, basically, you applied a workaround patch without caution and > without understanding fully the issue, while strongly refused when i > did the same, and furthermore in a much less intrusive way. Thank y

Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch

2006-03-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:34:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:13:42 +0100 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, basically, you applied a workaround patch without caution and > > without understanding fully the issue, while strongly refused when i > > did t

Re: Bug#345067: My understanding of the IDE mess, and why it does not make sense to apply the proposed patch

2006-03-13 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I believe it is important for yaird to apply same strict logic to all > Linux kernels, official or not. Seems perfectly reasonable to me. I think the following has been discovered: 1. The ide-generic requirement was added by the modular IDE patch, which Debian included

Bug#355204: sorry - duplicate

2006-03-13 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote: > > can you please check which klibc is installed? > > 1.2.4-1 ok thanks for feedback. > > and if the initramfs you were booting contains this latest klibc? > > Yes - I explicitly forced an initramfs rebuild before testing. newer klibc has more Kbuild

Bug#355204: sorry - duplicate

2006-03-13 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:02 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, dann frazier wrote: > > > > can you please check which klibc is installed? > > > > 1.2.4-1 > > ok thanks for feedback. > > > > and if the initramfs you were booting contains this latest klibc? > > > > Yes - I e

Re: Duplicate flavor builds

2006-03-13 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:21:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:29:00PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've run a test build of 2.6.16-rc6, using dists/trunk/linux-2.6. It > > appears that each flavor gets built twice, which is a huge waste of > > resources.

Bug#333365: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: ip6table causes kernel to dropp all ipv6 traffic after a while)

2006-03-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:39:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: ip6table causes kernel to dropp all ipv6 traffic after a while has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

initramfs-tools 0.53c MIGRATED to testing

2006-03-13 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.53 Current version: 0.53c -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

Re: initramfs-tools 0.53c MIGRATED to testing

2006-03-13 Thread Angelo Bertolli
Debian testing watch wrote: >FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package >in Debian's testing distribution has changed. > > Previous version: 0.53 > Current version: 0.53c > > Thanks!! Bug 356172 is now fixed on my laptop. I don't know how to follow-up on the debian bug tracker

Processed: Re: initramfs-tools 0.53c MIGRATED to testing

2006-03-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 356172 + fixed Bug#356172: kernel 2.6.15 for 686 can't mount root fs There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Re: initramfs-tools 0.53c MIGRATED to testing

2006-03-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
tags 356172 + fixed thanks * Angelo Bertolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 19:54]: > Thanks!! Bug 356172 is now fixed on my laptop. I don't know how to > follow-up on the debian bug tracker, so can someone mark it as > fixed, or tell me how? Thanks for the note! I'm glad it's working for you