Processed: reassign kernel bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 357236 linux-2.6 Bug#357236: linux-image-2.6.16-rc5-686: no sound on Lifebook P2120 Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.16-rc5-686' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-rc5-686' to `linux-2.6'. > reassign 356933 linux-2.6 Bug#

Processed: Oops, severity re-up sent to the wrong address?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 358397 grave Bug#358397: initramfs-tools: Fails to install Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

HELP!What's wrong with my Debian system(2.6.8)

The system just uses  iptables for nat and there is often these error as follow:   Apr  2 13:27:20 debian kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00040030Apr  2 13:27:20 debian kernel:  printing eip:Apr  2 13:27:20 debian kernel: c0168a15Apr  2 13:27:20 debian kernel: *pd

Processed: reassign 360561 to linux-image-2.6.16-1-686

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16 > reassign 360561 linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 Bug#360561: cmucl: CMUCL does not run under kernel version 2.6.16 Bug reassigned from package `cmucl' to `linux-image-2.6.16-1-686'. > End of

Re: [cl-debian] Bug#360561: cmucl: CMUCL does not run under kernel version 2.6.16

On Monday 03 April 2006 10:51, Christian Lynbech wrote: > Package: cmucl > Version: 19c-release-20051115-2 > Severity: normal > > When trying to run CMUCL under the recently released 2.6.16 kernels, > it fails to start with the error: > > chateau:~> lisp > Couldn't mmap at 0xbe00, len

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_powerpc.changes

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-2.6_2.6.16-5.dsc linux-2.6_2.6.16-5.diff.gz linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-5_all.deb linux-manual-2.6.16_2.6.16-5_all.deb linux-patch-debian-2.6.16_2.6.16-5_all.deb linux-source-2.6.16_2.6.16-5_al

Bug#360561: #360561

clone 360561 -1 reassign 360561 cmucl severity 360561 important reassign -1 linux-2.6 2.6.16-1 retitle -1 linux-2.6 [i386]: sets non-default vm split thanks This are two bugs: - cmucl assumes that the address space on i386 extends up to 0xc000, this is not longer true with newer kernel. So c

Processed: #360561

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 360561 -1 Bug#360561: cmucl: CMUCL does not run under kernel version 2.6.16 Bug 360561 cloned as bug 360598. > reassign 360561 cmucl Bug#360561: cmucl: CMUCL does not run under kernel version 2.6.16 Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_powerpc.changes is NEW

kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb to poo

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_s390.changes

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-support-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-5_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.16-1-all_2.6.16-5_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.16-1-all-s390_2.6.16-5_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-5_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.16-1-s3

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_s390.changes is NEW

(new) kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.16-5_s390.deb extra base WARNING: Already present in main distribution. Linux kernel 2.6 image on IBM S/390 machines - transition package This package is for transition only. (new) kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.16-5_s390.deb extra base WARNING: Already present in main

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_i386.changes

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-support-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-5_i386.deb linux-headers-2.6.16-1-all_2.6.16-5_i386.deb linux-headers-2.6.16-1-all-i386_2.6.16-5_i386.deb linux-headers-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-5_i386.deb linux-image-2.6.16-1-48

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_i386.changes is NEW

(new) kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-5_i386.deb extra base WARNING: Already present in main distribution. Linux kernel 2.6 image on 486-class machines - transition package This package is for transition only. (new) kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-5_i386.deb extra base WARNING: Already present in main

Bug#359207: marked as done (Cant use some USB keys because of CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_CUMANA)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:19:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#359207: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.16-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#358913: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: USB flash stick created on Macintosh doesn't work)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:19:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#359207: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.16-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#359813: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686: ".kernelrelease" is missing)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:19:36 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#359813: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.16-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_s390.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.16-5_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.16-5_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.16-5_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.16-5_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.16-5_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linu

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-5_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.16-5_powerpc.d

linux-2.6_2.6.16-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-5_i386.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-5_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-5_i386.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-5_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.16-5_i386.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kern

Processed: doesn't affect linux-2.6

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 241670 kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa Bug#241670: kernel-image-2.4.20-32-smp: inadequate description of SMP Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa'. > tag 241670 sarge Bug#241670: kernel-image-2.4.20-32-smp: inadequate de

Bug#241670: doesn't affect linux-2.6

reassign 241670 kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa tag 241670 sarge stop linux-2.6 descriptions include the string "multi-processor", so this only affects sarge. sarge/hppa was 2.6-only, so it only affects 2.6.8 -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Bug#269037: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.27-32-smp: Fails to boot on HP J5600)

Your message dated Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:22:14 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line HPPA 2.4 kernel bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#283654: marked as done (Please provide a PDC kernel as well)

Your message dated Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:22:14 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line HPPA 2.4 kernel bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Re: Bug#293569: Add megaraid to /etc/mkinitrd/modules

Hey All, I have been fooling around with trying to get the stock sarge kernel working with my Dell poweredge series of servers, same megaraid 2 issue. If and when this is fixed, will I still be able to run Sarge, will the update be part of a kernel upgrade? Thanks in advance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#360669: linux-2.6: CIFS mounts against servers which require packet signing (eg. Win2K3) cannot read files

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: normal Tags: patch Version: 2.6.16-4 Basically, the CIFS in 2.6.16 fails to sign packets properly when reading files. This is a regression against 2.6.15. The upstream author's GIT tree has a patch [1] which he states in [2] that he will push upstream ASAP, and [3] su

Processed: Re: Bug#360619: Installer numbers SCSI drives diffently than the post install system does on Dell PE1855 (Debian 3.1r1)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 360619 initramfs-tools Bug#360619: Installer numbers SCSI drives diffently than the post install system does on Dell PE1855 (Debian 3.1r1) Warning: Unknown package 'debian' Bug reassigned from package `debian' to `initramfs-tools'. > thanks S

Bug#360681: kernel: NIC: Unknow symbol mii_*

Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-486 Tags: d-i Hello, On a computer where d-i works fine with 2.6.15, it doesn't work with 2.6.16. The NIC module is not loaded. Debian-Installer syslog says: Apr 4 02:32:12 kernel: eepro100: Unknown symbol mii_ethtool_sset Apr 4 02:32:12 kernel: eepro100: Unknown s

Bug#353400: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp: acorn.c's adfs_check_CUMANA can give a false positive on a vfat disk)

Your message dated Mon, 3 Apr 2006 20:34:02 -0700 (PDT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line acorn.c's adfs_check_CUMANA can give a false positive on a vfat disk has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Re: pending linux-2.6 changes

On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote: * linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all Depend against linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all-$arch. * linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all-$arch Depends against any real headers packages. * linux-support-$version-$abiname Only needed to bootstrap modules pa

Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion

Hi, In the discussion I've seen so far most people tend to favor the system, in which each individual module package builds the binary packages matching the current kernels. Based on that I've written a very preliminary draft of the policy (below). One problem with the described scheme is tha