Hi Graham,
I was able to find this rather old posting on the topic:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.audio.cd-paranoia.general/611
Bill Davidsen (second message) mentions some fixes which were supposed to
improve the situation, but it looks like they never made it to mainline
kernels. Can y
Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 02:00:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed by grub
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Inteed, this has already been fixed.
Upgrade udev, delete /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules and VLAN
interfaces will stop being renamed.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
FYI: The status of the mkvmlinuz source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 18
Current version: 20
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
To UNS
reassign 366276 udev
thanks
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 09:55:19PM +0200, Jorgen Rosink wrote:
> # cat /proc/net/vlan/config
> VLAN Dev name| VLAN ID
> Name-Type: VLAN_NAME_TYPE_PLUS_VID_NO_PAD
> vlan72_temp| 72 | eth0
This is a bug in the udev network device renaming code. There was some
fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 366276 udev
Bug#366276: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: e1000 VLAN support broken in linux-image
2.6.16-12 (2.6.16-1-686)
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-1-686' to `udev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-12
Severity: normal
After booting 2.6.16-12 linux-image VLAN support on Intel e1000 network
interface is
broken. VLAN's did and do work on all previous Debian 2.6.16 linux-images.
--- example ---
# ifup vlan72
Set name-type for VLAN subsystem
Hi,
linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686 2.6.16-12 recommends libc6-i686, while
there is a special (nosegneg) libc6-xen available, which conflicts with
the -i686 one.
Is the recommendation by kernel package a mistake, or has libc6-i686
been made xen-friendly?
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686
Severity: normal
As said in the subject, the /boot/config-2.6.16-1-xen-686 file is not
shipped in the package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bi
9 matches
Mail list logo
