Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 374378 important
Unknown tag/s: important.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10
tags 374378 important
stop
breakage happens not under usual circumstances thus severity important.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:35:21AM +0300, Viktor Pilpenok wrote:
> If pvmove was ran on the system and did not complete (eg due to a crash,
> power
> failure, etc), LVM2 requires the "mirror" dm
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 09:16:36PM -0500, Malcolm E. Jordan wrote:
> I have no idea what that has done to the security of the system. I
> would like to know if any one has any suggestion on what to do and how
> to do it.
hey Malcolm,
I think the debian-user list is more likely to get you some u
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:44:01PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Yeah, istr having an issue like that as well. We should probably keep the
> 2.6.16 compiler hardcoded to whatever is the default in etch when we
> upload (its still gcc-4.0 today, right)?
It will be hardcoded to -4.0 with the next up
I am running a standalone desktop Debian system ,version 2.4.27-2-386,
stable 3.1 release (Sarge) on the following machine:
Intel Pentium 4 CPU 1500Hz stepping 07
Intell corp 82850 850 (Tehama) chipset
500 MB ram memory
On boot I get the following messages lines. These lines were not
included in
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.60
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
If pvmove was ran on the system and did not complete (eg due to a crash, power
failure, etc), LVM2 requires the "mirror" dm target to activate the VG
By default the initrd only contains dm-mod and dm
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:23:15PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> ia64 configs have been updated & test builds are in progress
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux biglpk 2.6.17
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 12:06:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > What about :
> > >
> > > We upload linux-2.6 2.6.17 ASAP, and if 2.6.16 is finally
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
> unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
i'll prepare an klibc upload for tuesday:
1.3.40
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:29:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Is the plan to do a "linux-2.6.16" upload at the same time, or does
> > this imply a decision to use >= 2.6.17 in etch?
>
> We have not yet decided abo
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
snapshots for
amd64
i386
powerpc
s390
sparc
and the sources can be found here (when they have finished building):
http://kernel-archi
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > What about :
> >
> > We upload linux-2.6 2.6.17 ASAP, and if 2.6.16 is finally the way to go,
> > we
> > upload linux-2.6.16 or linux-2.6.etch, and pr
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> What about :
>
> We upload linux-2.6 2.6.17 ASAP, and if 2.6.16 is finally the way to go, we
> upload linux-2.6.16 or linux-2.6.etch, and propagate this one to testing.
The problem is: we need a kernel >> 2.6.15 in testing AS
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:29:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Is the plan to do a "linux-2.6.16" upload at the same time, or does
> > this imply a decision to use >= 2.6.17 in etch?
>
> We have not yet decided abo
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:29:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Is the plan to do a "linux-2.6.16" upload at the same time, or does
> this imply a decision to use >= 2.6.17 in etch?
We have not yet decided about what to use for etch. There has not been
any more commitment towards a long-te
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 10:42:54PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 21:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Package: kernel
> > Version:
> Which version do you use? Own or from package?
Thanks Laszlo.
The kernel.org bug report says Debian's 2.6.15.
Tomek: Can you try
FYI: The status of the mkvmlinuz source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 21
Current version: 22
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
To UNS
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 21:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Version:
Which version do you use? Own or from package?
> When I attatch my pendrive to a USB port it is recognized by the kernel and
> /dev/sda and /dev/sda1 devices are created, but the pendrive can not be
> moun
Package: kernel
Version:
When I attatch my pendrive to a USB port it is recognized by the kernel and
/dev/sda and /dev/sda1 devices are created, but the pendrive can not be mounted.
I have reported this bug to the Linux Kernel bug tracking system. More
information on the bug can be found at
h
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:15:13AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> So if you use amd64 now, then what will you use when amd releases an
> amd64 architecture chip called k9 that should have a different kernel
> than the k8? Same for em64t. I imagine the pentium-m derived chips
> will pref
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:47:56AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 00:42, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > -generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming
> > scheme completely, and call the flavors 2.6.x-y-amd64 and
> > 2.6.x-y-em64t respectively.
>
> So
user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
usertag 372621 + dkt-pending-sarge-update
stop
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:30:39AM +0700, wrote:
>
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> Version: 2.6.8-16sarge2
>
> When I used fprobe-ulog kernel printed sometimes:
> ipt_ULOG: error during NLMSG_PUT
>
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> What is the status of the other architectures?
ia64 configs have been updated & test builds are in progress
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
> unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
Is the plan to do a "linux-2.6.16" upload at the same time, or does
this imply a decision to use >= 2.6.17 in
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> hppa
Test build underway, with 2/4 flavours built, the only update needed
seems to be a new config option.
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
> unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
I take it that the idea of using 2.6.16.x for etch has been dropped?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> m68k
I am waiting for the linux-m68k CVS to catch up. Could happen today, or next
month... I would give it about a week.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686
Version: 2.6.16-14
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've got an ALLNET 0192 pc-card:
PRODID_1="PCMCIA"
PRODID_2="11M WLAN Card v2.5"
PRODID_3="ISL37300P"
PRODID_4="RevA"
MANFID=0274,1612
This card is about three years old, and used to work with the
linux-wlan-ng drivers ba
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> alpha
Test-build is running currently.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
snapshots for
amd64
i386
powerpc
s390
sparc
and the sources can be found here (when they have finished building):
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/lin
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:04:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:15:29PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Package: mkvmlinuz
> > Version: 22
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: make package in question unusable
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > mkvmlinuz currently fails to work at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 333835 !
Bug#333835: ctrlproxy: Eats up memory making the system unusable
Changed Bug submitter from Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Frans Pop <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 361872 !
Bug#361872: debconf-copydb: Trashes debconf database in
32 matches
Mail list logo
