Bug#377423: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp: Fails to find boot device (AHCI ICH7 Family))

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:48:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#377423: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp: Fails to find boot device (AHCI ICH7 Family) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#377423: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp: Fails to find boot device (AHCI ICH7 Family)

2006-07-08 Thread Andrew Nady
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp Version: 2.6.16-14 Severity: serious Justification: 3 Hardware: ASUS P5WD2 Maxtor SATA 300G DELL monitor with 4 usb card readers FPW2004 Configuration: Maxtor hard drive connected to SATA port 1 (sda) The ATA bus is configured in BIOS to AHCI mode. Prob

Processed: control

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 376488 linux-2.6 Bug#376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686' to `linux-2.6'. > forcemerge 368544 376488 Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-exist

Bug#376012: marked as done (enable CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE for powerpc-miboot)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:49:02 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#376012: fixed in linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#376926: marked as done (new kernel is too large for nslu2)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:49:02 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#376926: fixed in linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processing of linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16_powerpc.changes

2006-07-08 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16.dsc linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16.diff.gz linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-16_all.deb linux-manual-2.6.16_2.6.16-16_all.deb linux-patch-debian-2.6.16_2.6.16-16_all.deb linux-source-2.6

linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16.diff.gz linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-16.dsc linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-16_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-16_all.deb linux-header

Processed: #376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 376488 grave Bug#376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#376488: #376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies

2006-07-08 Thread Adam Di Carlo
severity 376488 grave thanks Rationale: bug renders package unusable. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.debian.org/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: control

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 377375 linux-2.6 Bug#377375: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Requires linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does not exist Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7' to `linux-2.6'. > forcemerge 368544 377375 Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-

Bug#377375: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Requires linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does not exist

2006-07-08 Thread Kristine Daniels
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Subject says it all. This headers package has been out here for over a week without a corresponding kbuild package. Kindly provide the kbuild package, or fix the headers package not to require the kbuild p

Bug#376792: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7 uninstallable)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#368667: marked as done (unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#376174: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686 depends on nonexistent package linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#368937: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: fails to install)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#375562: marked as done (unsatisfiable Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#375432: marked as done (One package is missing)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#373610: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-486: dependency unmet )

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#368544: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-existant package linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#376305: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8: not installable because of dependency on "linux-kbuild-2.6.17")

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#373617: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-k7: dependency unmet )

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#375859: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1: package uninstallable as it depends on the package linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#375647: marked as done (linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing dependencies)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#376290: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: fails to install)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#373616: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: dependency unmet )

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#376121: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: depends on non-existing package linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#377235: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: package uninstallable)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#375906: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Not installable on sid: depends on linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does not exist)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-

Processed: severity of 377350 is normal

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 377350 normal Bug#377350: linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686_2.6.16-15 depends on initramfs-tools Severity set to `normal' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing

Bug#377350: linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686_2.6.16-15 depends on initramfs-tools

2006-07-08 Thread James Harper
Package: linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686 Version: 2.6.16-15 Severity: important linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686 only contains modules for xen domains, and should not require any initrd or initramfs tools. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (

Bug#377324: linux-2.6: HPA re-enabled after resume causes hard drive to be partially not accessible

2006-07-08 Thread Arnaud Cornet
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: normal Tags: patch Host protected area (sometimes called hidden protected area) is used to have a hidden partition at the end of the harddrive. The linux kernel disables HPA on boot and makes the whole harddrive available to the kernel. I have a /home partition overlap

Bug#314954: marked as done (kernel: USB Mouse dies)

2006-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:40:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#341801: skge error; hangs w/ hardware memory hole

2006-07-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-07 23:28]: > Is that a board with VIA chipset? Yes, according to lspci, there's a VIA K8T800Pro and VT8237. :00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge :00:00.1 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge

Re: Scheduling 2.6.16-16 (was: Re: linux-2.6.16_2.6.16-15+b1_arm.changes ACCEPTED)

2006-07-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-07 20:13]: > linux-2.6* is not binNMU-able. This upload includes source changes. This latter has nothing to do with the former at all. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs