The kernel freeze must be delayed quite significantly for a fairly obvious
reason: the Debian kernel *still* has a lot of non-free and sourceless firmware
in
it. Unfortunately, little to no progress has been made on this.
I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this is pretty obvious from
Package: linux-source-2.6.17
Version: 2.6.17-5
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The provided link to get more information from,
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/tech/nand.html, is broken.
I did some researching and I think they moved the link to
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/archive/tech/n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 375035 !
Bug#375035: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running
initramfs init
Changed Bug submitter from root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 369303 !
Bug#369303: [powerpc] On oldwo
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:06:23AM +, Bastian Blank wrote:
> If you want to be correct, you can't use linux-source. So the security
> team have to support another kernel source.
A kernel-patch package that applies on top of the kernel team's
linux-source is the approach I'd suggest. But to rei
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 07:35:25PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:57:02AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > well, my ugly workaround was to add a hook that installs /bin/mount to
> > /mount, and hack /usr/share/ltsp/scripts/nfs to use /mount directly.
> >
> > not at
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How big is the patchset these days, and what does it touch? I haven't
> messed with Lustre since 2.4.20 where the core patches were mostly
> adding intents, etc - stuff that I thought had been merged upstream in
> 2.6.
There still is a lot of patching in
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7
Version: 2.6.16-17
Severity: important
Hello,
I have the problem that the sound doesn't work with kernel 2.6.16,
whereas it works perfectly with 2.6.15. As you can see from the attached
outputs, the drivers loaded are the same, but certain devices just don't
get
I've found http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/patch-tracking/ a really
useful way of knowing what the kernel team thinks about kernel
vulnerabilities. But it seems to have gone away. Has it moved somewhere
else, or is there a better way for me to check debians position against
http://svn.debian
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Can you make an announcement to all oot-module maintainers, telling them
> that they should put their packages together into linux-modules-extra
> (for main) or a similar one for contrib, and if they're not doing it,
> they will end up in an unsupported (no updates for point
I'd like to see it as a flavour. This is also how pretty much every
other noteworthy distribution is doing it (a -bigsmp or -pae flavour, so
there is some precedence.)
You'd be surprised on how many PAE needing servers there are in
enterprises. Having no officially supported kernel images for
Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:59:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381009: fixed in usplash 0.3d
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:59:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380745: fixed in usplash 0.3d
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:59:43PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Now to my question. Lustre needs a specialy patched kernel
Why? Ah I see, they don't know how to abstract that and get informations
how to do that properly from upstream.
>
Accepted:
usplash_0.3d.dsc
to pool/main/u/usplash/usplash_0.3d.dsc
usplash_0.3d.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/usplash/usplash_0.3d.tar.gz
usplash_0.3d_i386.deb
to pool/main/u/usplash/usplash_0.3d_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
usplash_0.3d.dsc - source misc
usplash_0.3d_i386.deb - opt
Your message dated Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:03:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381108: upslash not installable: usplash.postinst: 43:
rm_default_artwork: not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Package: usplash
Version: 0.3b
Severity: important
On fresh install it gave:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/usplash.postinst: 43: rm_default_artwork: not found
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (670, 'proposed-updates'), (670, 'stable'), (620,
'testing
Package: usplash
Version: 0.3a
Severity: minor
At the moment, usplash have a 15 second timeout. If no command is
sent to usplash for 15 seconds, it terminates and return to the text
console.
When using usplash in qemu on my laptop, it sometimse take more than
15 seconds between such commands du
Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.16-17
While (re)compiling the VMWare-Player module I get the following error:
--
acer:~# uname -a
Linux acer 2.6.16-2-686-smp #1 SMP Sat Jul 15 22:33:00 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
acer:~# vmware-config.pl
.
usplash_0.3d_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usplash_0.3d.dsc
usplash_0.3d.tar.gz
usplash_0.3d_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
19 matches
Mail list logo
