[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 04, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
think not? Prove it by proposing a GR. More importantly, the release team
I had such a plan, but no time to implement it currently.
How do you handle the fact that it is a license violation
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.73b
Tags: patch
The generated initramfs is world-readable (as well as the temporary
files); this leaks cryptographic keys (in password-protected form) to
all users on the system when the root fs is encrypted (because these
keys then get copied to the initramfs,
initramfs-tools_0.73c_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.73c.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.73c.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.73c_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.73c.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.73c.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.73c.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.73c.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.73c_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.73c_all.deb
Override entries
On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:30, Marco d'Itri wrote:
In linux.debian.kernel Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be
true or at least do not consider it a problem, and this is enough for
me to ignore the opinion of the
Your message dated Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:47:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#381475: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.73c
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:21:32PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 04, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
think not? Prove it by proposing a GR. More importantly, the release
team
I had such a plan, but no time to
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.16-17
When I boot the installer on my MacBook Pro, it sometimes kernel
panics:
Getting VERSION: 50014
Getting VERSION: 50014
Getting ID: 0
Getting LVT0: 700
Getting LVT1: 400
enabled ExtINT on CPU#0
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2
Hello,
I think reorganising the patches starting with 2.6.18 is a good idea,
especially when I look at the tons of patches we had in some of the past
releases.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.73b
Followup-For: Bug #359926
i'm getting this almost every other time in a qemu environment:
Begin: Running /scripts/nfs-premount ...
Done.
nfs: server 10.0.2.2 not responding, timed out
nfs: server 10.0.2.2 not responding, timed out
mount: I/O error
short
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In linux.debian.kernel Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real issue here is one of freedom and DFSG and not one of legality anyway.
Those firmware are not DFSG-free and have nothing to do in main, and this is
the real problem.
They were not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
George Danchev wrote:
On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:30, Marco d'Itri wrote:
In linux.debian.kernel Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be
true or at least do not consider it a
Subject: mkvmlinuz should bail if it can't find addnote
Package: mkvmlinuz
Version: 23
A user from Ubuntu reported a bug in mkvmlinuz's failure reporting.
mkvmlinuz terminates silently when the object dir can't be found and verbose
mode is not set. It shouild bail and tell the user that the
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, i don't believe there is much choice left to the kernel team in
this issue but to ask for a waiver of the DFSG compliance for the
kernel for etch, and hope the d-i folk take their responsabilities a
bit more seriously for the etch+1 release.
Or, the
14 matches
Mail list logo
