Bug#385102: linux-patch-debian-2.6.17: broken unpatch/debian script (calls non-existent "/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.17" dir)

2006-08-28 Thread Sukant Hajra
Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.17 Version: 2.6.17-7 Severity: important Hi, I'm just an end user, and I was originally downloading linux-source- packages to compile them "the Debian way" with make-kpkg. I decided that it might be nice to save the time downloading the entire kernel source, and

Bug#385095: linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7: Flaky mouse and sluggish interactive response

2006-08-28 Thread Daniel Dickinson
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7 Version: 2.6.17-7 Severity: important On a system that works with 2.6.16-2-k7_2.6.16-18 upgrading to 2.6.17-2-k7_2.6.17-7 results in a system for which the mouse (a Logitech TrackMan) is flaky (jumps around on the screen) and which feels sluggish (perhaps just poo

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Oleg Verych
Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:14:30AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:51:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:15:49AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: request_firmware() is dead also. YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:14:30AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:51:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:15:49AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > >>request_firmware() is dead also. > > > >>YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary i

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Oleg Verych
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:51:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:15:49AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > >>request_firmware() is dead also. > > >>YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel. > > >>And please don't add new useless info _in_ it. > > He

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:15:49AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > >On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 02:35 +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > >>request_firmware() is dead also. > >>YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel. > >>And please don't add new useless

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:35:26AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:11:42PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > >>I've tested this with the aic94xx driver using the new MODULE_FIRMWARE() > >>tag. Initramfs should be much easier because it already include

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Oleg Verych
James Bottomley wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 02:35 +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: request_firmware() is dead also. YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel. And please don't add new useless info _in_ it. I er don't think so. Hell, what can be as easy as this: ,-

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread James Bottomley
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 02:35 +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > request_firmware() is dead also. > YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel. > And please don't add new useless info _in_ it. I er don't think so. We (as in the Kernel) are forcing drivers on to this path. Y

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread James Bottomley
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 01:04 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Notice that mkinitrd-tools is dead, and will probably be removed from etch. > > mkinitramfs-tools and yaird are the two currently used tools. Yes ... I'm aware of that. That's why this is a reference implementation. initramfs should be eas

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Oleg Verych
Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:11:42PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > I've tested this with the aic94xx driver using the new MODULE_FIRMWARE() tag. Initramfs should be much easier because it already includes most of the boot time loading; all it has to do is the piece identifyi

Bug#384202: Installer works with daily build, post installation kernel does not

2006-08-28 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:40:01PM -0400, jef e wrote: > > dann frazier wrote: > > >Dykema, Erik wrote: > >>Using the build for i386, I was able to install very cleanly, and > >> reboot, at which point the USB > >> messages started spewing again. By hitting ctrl-c a few times, I was able

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:11:42PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > This is a reference implementation with the debian mkinitrd-tools > package. It shows how to identify the firmware files necessary for > drivers in the initrd and also includes a primitive system for loading > them. > > I've teste

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

2006-08-28 Thread James Bottomley
This is a reference implementation with the debian mkinitrd-tools package. It shows how to identify the firmware files necessary for drivers in the initrd and also includes a primitive system for loading them. I've tested this with the aic94xx driver using the new MODULE_FIRMWARE() tag. Initramf

Bug#384202: Installer works with daily build, post installation kernel does not

2006-08-28 Thread jef e
dann frazier wrote: >Dykema, Erik wrote: >> Using the build for i386, I was able to install very cleanly, and >> reboot, at which point the USB >> messages started spewing again. By hitting ctrl-c a few times, I was able >> to get to a login >> prompt, and can access the machine, althou

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-28 Thread Michael Biebl
maximilian attems wrote: > first of all this not serious, > update-initramfs -u doesn't update _all_ initramfs > and it never did. so this bug report is bogus. > Mea culpa! You are right, update-initramfs -u never updated all initramfs (only your last email made this clear to me). I'm not quite s

Bug#385037: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: e100 driver has frequent timeouts

2006-08-28 Thread Brian T. Sniffen
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 Version: 2.6.17-7 Severity: normal Tags: patch The e100 driver here shows frequent errors of the form: Aug 28 08:18:15 teleri kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Aug 28 08:18:15 teleri kernel: e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 10Mbps, full-duplex

Processed: squashfs: FTBFS on ia64

2006-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 371867 linux-modules-extra-2.6 Bug#371867: squashfs_1:3.0-5(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing files Bug reassigned from package `squashfs' to `linux-modules-extra-2.6'. > retitle 371867 FTBFS on ia64 Bug#371867: squashfs_1:3.0-5(ia64/unstable): F

Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed

2006-08-28 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:08:06 +0200 maximilian attems wrote: > forgot to ask: > > ls -l /etc/lilo.conf > cat /etc/lilo.conf Please beware that it is perfectly ok to leave behind configuration files. Debian should behave sanely even if not purged. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og I

Bug#383582: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: suspend doesn't work with 2.6.17

2006-08-28 Thread Pierre Letouzey
I confirm, same S3 problem here on a Dell Latitude D810, with both linux-image-2.6.17-1-686 and linux-image-2.6.17-2-686, while 2.6.16-2-686 was ok. For your information, in a fedora forum, somebody mentionned this as a "reported and widely known" error, that is supposed to have been fixed in

Processed: Re: Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed

2006-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 384967 - moreinfo + pending Unknown tag/s: +. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream

Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed

2006-08-28 Thread maximilian attems
tags 384967 - moreinfo + pending stop hello anthony, On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:21:16AM +0100, Anthony Callegaro wrote: > Hi Maximilan ! > > >From your suggestions I manage to find a solution to my issue, sorry > about the unnecessary noise :o( > > For the record here is my kernel-img.conf : >

Bug#369906: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7: upgrade initramfs-tools package solved the problem

2006-08-28 Thread Bug Filler
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7 Followup-For: Bug #369906 As seen with bug #383555, the bug is in one of udev/initramfs-tools/klibc packages. Upgrade to the new initramfs-tools and recreate kernel image solved the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers u

Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed

2006-08-28 Thread Anthony Callegaro
Hi Maximilan ! >From your suggestions I manage to find a solution to my issue, sorry about the unnecessary noise :o( For the record here is my kernel-img.conf : $ cat /etc/kernel-img.conf do_symlinks = yes relative_links = yes do_bootloader = yes do_bootfloppy = no do_initrd = yes link_in_boot =

Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed

2006-08-28 Thread maximilian attems
forgot to ask: ls -l /etc/lilo.conf cat /etc/lilo.conf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384972: Fix sound on MacBook Pro

2006-08-28 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.17-7 In order to support sound on the MacBook Pro, two patches from upstream need to be applied: * http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=62fe78e90dc25b269362034487dc450cd8453e8c * http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/t

Bug#369906: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7: I too have problem with mouse on latest 2.6.16 kernel.

2006-08-28 Thread Bug Filler
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7 Version: 2.6.16-18 Followup-For: Bug #369906 I too has this /dev/input/mice not found problem when the latest 2.6.16 kernel. As a result, X server won't start because it cannot find a pointer device. Lucky for me that I know how to use querybts and see this bug r

Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed

2006-08-28 Thread maximilian attems
tags 384967 moreinfo thanks On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:29:58AM +0100, Anthony Callegaro wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've seen lots of discussion already on the initramfs/lilo dependency when > people are using grub, but I didn't see any report of my issue. > > I'm using grub only (lilo is not inst

Processed: Re: Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed

2006-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 384967 moreinfo Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#384967: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade if lilo is not installed

2006-08-28 Thread Anthony Callegaro
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.76 Severity: important Hi all, I've seen lots of discussion already on the initramfs/lilo dependency when people are using grub, but I didn't see any report of my issue. I'm using grub only (lilo is not installed) on my machine and during the last 2 upgrade

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-28 Thread maximilian attems
first of all this not serious, update-initramfs -u doesn't update _all_ initramfs and it never did. so this bug report is bogus. On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:59:53AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > > I'm raising the severity to serio

Bug#384955: Nokia E70 as "PC suite" destabilises kernel

2006-08-28 Thread Sam Freed
Package: kernel Version: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 2.6.17-7 x debian unstable Severity: normal Hardware Environment: Toshiba Portege R100, Nokia E70 When connecting Nokia E70 as "PC suite", kernel destabilises to the point of crashing randomly. When connecting the USB cable, the E70 give

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-28 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:59:53AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > severity 383600 serious > thanks > > Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:03:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Eduard Bloch wrote: > >>> #include > >>> * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 01:07:34PM]: > Eduard B

Bug#384934: Does not depend on Xen hypervisor as advertised in description

2006-08-28 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 384934 normal tags 384934 pending On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 06:20:10PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > The same problem exists with xen-linux-system-2.6.17-2-xen-k7. Yes, it is known and waiting for something else. Bastian -- I have never understood the female capacity to avoid a direct a

Processed: Re: Bug#384934: Does not depend on Xen hypervisor as advertised in description

2006-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 384934 normal Bug#384934: Does not depend on Xen hypervisor as advertised in description Severity set to `normal' from `important' > tags 384934 pending Bug#384934: Does not depend on Xen hypervisor as advertised in description There were no t