On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Second: this release contains ALL binary firmware blobs shipped
> > upstream, even those we kept pruning since the day Herbert Xu removed
> > them the first tim
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:20:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:38, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > First, the migration status and plan looks as follows:
> > - linux-2.6 2.6.17-9 has already migrated to testing and can be updated
> > through t-p-u.
> > - after linux-l
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Second: this release contains ALL binary firmware blobs shipped
> > upstream, even those we kept pruning since the day Herbert Xu removed
> > them the first tim
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Second: this release contains ALL binary firmware blobs shipped
> upstream, even those we kept pruning since the day Herbert Xu removed
> them the first time in 2004.
What in the world? Why would you do that anyway?
> Initia
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:25:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387759: linux-modules-extra-2.6: adding pwc modules
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Victor Seva wrote:
>> Please add pwc modules.
>
> Does not build with 2.6.18-rc7.
> |
> /home/waldi/debian/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_powerpc_none_pow
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:02:39AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks, Sven
>
> It is impossible to build modules again -prep.
>
> | CC [M]
> /home/waldi/debian/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-modules-extra-2.6/debian/build/build_powerpc_none_prep_redhat-cluster/gfs/gulm/gulm_core.o
> | In file
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388477 important
Bug#388477: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7-smp: NFS Server no response with smp kernel
on AMD
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
severity 388477 important
stop
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:20PM +0200, Matthias Kreis wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7-smp
> Version: 2.6.16-18
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
no one broken fs on one box is not critical
> I use the following kernel linux-
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.17+2_amd64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-amd64-generic_2.6.17+2_amd64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.17+2_amd64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.17+2_amd64.deb
kernel-image-2.6-amd
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:26:11PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > ppc builds modular input i8042, so we need to try to modprobe it.
> >
> > is your root device there when you are dropped to the rescue shell?
maks, i think the best here would be to do a per-subarch
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7-smp
Version: 2.6.16-18
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I use the following kernel linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7 on my workstation. My home
is on the server mounted
with nfs. Starting Mozilla Firefox works fine.
As soon as I use the linux-imag
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.17+2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.17+2_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.17+2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.17+2_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.17+2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388453 linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 2.6.16-18
Bug#388453: fails to handle interrupt
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-video-via' to
`linux-image-2.6.16-2-686'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00:21AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> the idea is to backup on an update call any initramfs
> that is older than a certain time, lets say 6h or maybe 24h
> thus not created while upgrading mdadm, udev, usplash, cryptsetup or
> so together.
"older than 'uptime'" is w
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:38, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> First, the migration status and plan looks as follows:
> - linux-2.6 2.6.17-9 has already migrated to testing and can be updated
> through t-p-u.
> - after linux-latest-2.6 migrates into testing later today, we will
> upload a new
Hello,
Linux 2.6.18 has been released, and it looks like we can do a first
upload today.
First, the migration status and plan looks as follows:
- linux-2.6 2.6.17-9 has already migrated to testing and can be updated
through t-p-u.
- after linux-latest-2.6 migrates into testing later today,
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:51:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00:21AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > nono, not debconf please.
>
> Why not debconf ?
useless user intervention, useless work for translators.
not portable beyond Debian unless carefully done.
> >
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00:21AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:17:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > What about backuping the currently running one ? Or keeping load of backups
> > ?
> >
> > But the idea was to ask this in a debconf question at lower priorities :
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:17:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:23:15AM +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
> > >>A power cut during update-initramfs may leave the system in an unbootable
> > >>state as the old initrd.img is overwritten, but the new initrd.img is not
> > >>yet co
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:23:15AM +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
> >>A power cut during update-initramfs may leave the system in an unbootable
> >>state as the old initrd.img is overwritten, but the new initrd.img is not
> >>yet completed. (This happened to me when my laptop battery ran empty.)
>
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7
Version: 2.6.17-9
Followup-For: Bug #386985
Got this same hang on a Sony VAIO PCG-FXA49.
2.6.16-2-k7 packages work fine, both revisions of the 2.6.17-2-k7 packages hang
on this machine (KM133), but work on KM266 desktop.
Booting with noacpi (editing grub command
A power cut during update-initramfs may leave the system in an unbootable state as the old initrd.img is
overwritten, but the new initrd.img is not yet completed. (This happened to me when my laptop battery ran empty.)
A simple fix would be to create the new initrd.img as a temporary file and m
24 matches
Mail list logo
