Bug#392078: cannot boot 2.6.18-1 on sunblade 100

2006-10-12 Thread Jim Watson
On 13/10/2006, at 3:32 PM, Jurij Smakov wrote: Thanks. One more thing: at boot time a line like this is displayed: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0: Clock regs at 01fff100 Can you tell me (and send to the bug too), how this line looks fo

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061013 06:43]: > Even if the kernel cannot be built with 4.1, it would be nice to have > bug reports. I'm not aware of any alpha related reports, although it's > not my pet arch. Of course. > I'm still planning not to build g++-4.0 from the 4.0 sources, now t

Bug#382472: initramfs-tools: really confused when initrd file has been removed

2006-10-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:16:39PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > Hi, > > 13:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot> rm initrd.img-2.6.18-1-xen-vserver-686 > 14:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot> update-initramfs -c -k 2.6.18-1-xen-vserver-686 > Cannot create version 2.6.18-1-xen-vserver-686: already exists > zsh: e

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Steve Langasek writes: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]: > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > > > Two big issues are still open: > > > > - hppa FTBFS > > > > - alpha gcc-4.

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > >> I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next > >> Thursday, 12th October. > > Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the f

Bug#392078: sunblade100 prtconf

2006-10-12 Thread Jim Watson
sunblade100 output of prtconf -p -v attached System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4u Memory size: 256 Megabytes System Peripherals (PROM Nodes): Node 0xf002a6e4 energystar-v3: idprom: 01830003.ba04a4ab.03ba.04a4ab82.... scsi-initiator-id:

Re: [Debian Installer] General release plan for RC1

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Frans, Glad to see you back up and about on Debian lists. :) On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:40:08AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > GENERAL STATUS > == > The most important work planned for RC1 has been done and the installer in > general works well, although some finishing touches and test

Bug#392065: linux-image-2.6.18-1-powerpc: System crash after a "bcm43xx: Controller restarted"

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 392065 important thanks On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 03:54:54AM +0200, HellComes wrote: > When I'm using this kernel on a notebook (iBook G4) with WPA-encrypted wifi > network working fine until I lose wifi > connection and a few seconds later I can't do nothing because the system is > froz

Processed: Re: Bug#392065: linux-image-2.6.18-1-powerpc: System crash after a "bcm43xx: Controller restarted"

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 392065 important Bug#392065: linux-image-2.6.18-1-powerpc: System crash after a "bcm43xx: Controller restarted" Severity set to `important' from `critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > > Two big issues are still open: > > > - hppa FTBFS > > > - alpha gcc-4.0 build dependency > > What should

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Jurij Smakov wrote: > What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1? Yes. > Anybody can run a build and make the log available? Tomorrow. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFC: position statement from the kernel team over the current non-free firmware GR vote.

2006-10-12 Thread Sven Luther
The kernel team consider that neither of the two proposals currently under vote are a good solution to the non-free firmware problem. The proposal made by Josselin (Choice 2) will have a hard time to pass, as it needs 3:1 supermajority. It gives a longer term exception for firmwares beyond the etc

Bug#252402: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-prep: "could not chdir to =D:No such file or directory")

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:59:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing, since there is no more 2.4.25 -prep kernel in the archive, and i remember this being fixed ages ago. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#248234: Could you try the current etch beta3 installer, or daily builds ?

2006-10-12 Thread Sven Luther
Hi, ... Could you try the current etch beta3 or daily build installer ? Also, it would be helpful if you gave more info about your hardware, since it seems to be lacking in the bug report. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#382472: initramfs-tools: really confused when initrd file has been removed

2006-10-12 Thread Carsten Hey
Followup-For: Bug #382472 Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.82~bpo.1 Hi, 13:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot> rm initrd.img-2.6.18-1-xen-vserver-686 14:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot> update-initramfs -c -k 2.6.18-1-xen-vserver-686 Cannot create version 2.6.18-1-xen-vserver-686: already exists zsh: ex

Bug#369448: Can you still reproduce this with 2.6.18 from unstable ?

2006-10-12 Thread Sven Luther
Hi, ... Just wondering if you can still reproduce this bug ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 389296

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 389296 + pending Bug#389296: linux-2.6_2.6.18-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: Missing build-dep? There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Processed: Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 387498 linux-2.6,libc6 Bug#387498: mipsel: system() hangs when compiled with -pg (gprof profiling) Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `linux-2.6,libc6'. > On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:02:58AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Unknown command or m

Re: Bug#387498: Unable to reproduce - mips/mipsel? 2.4/2.6 kernel difference?

2006-10-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
reassign 387498 linux-2.6,libc6 On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:02:58AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I am able to reproduce this bug, but on mipsel only. I am using a 2.6.17 > 64-bit kernel. I have made some more tests, I am actually able to reproduce it on both mips and mipsel, but only on 2.6 ker

Processed: linux-2.6 FTBFS on hppa is still there

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 389296 - pending Bug#389296: linux-2.6_2.6.18-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: Missing build-dep? Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending > found 389296 2.6.18-2 Bug#389296: linux-2.6_2.6.18-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: Missing build-dep? Bug marked as found

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: >> I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next >> Thursday, 12th October. > > Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following issues. > >> Two big issues are still ope

Draft position statement of the kernel team about the ongoing vote

2006-10-12 Thread Sven Luther
Hi all, ... I have drafted the following document on our wiki page : === There are currently two proposals being voted on, with a call for vote done hurriedly and without consideration for the position statement of the kernel team, nor for the fact that the below proposal was still being

Bug#289690: Data corruption?

2006-10-12 Thread Simon Waters
Just hit what I'm fairly sure is the same bug. Same errors logged. Was attempting to use ' perl -pi -e "s!--!---!" ' to update some files on a Windows 2000 server from a Sarge desktop. Attempts to workaround by using cifs immediately after the problem occurred (I did reboot, but otherwise I wa

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:41:00PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next > > Thursday, 12th October. > > Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following

Bug#392592: linux-headers-2.6.18-1-mckinley: ia64 misses some scripts when building external modules

2006-10-12 Thread Brice
Package: linux-headers-2.6.18-1-mckinley Version: 2.6.18-2 Severity: normal Hi, When trying to compile external modules on Debian's 2.6.18 kernel (and .17 too, and maybe others) on IA64/McKinley ItaniumII, the Makefile in arch/ia64/ misses some scripts: make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.18-

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > So, the only two options seem to me: > b) we ship with what we have in etch now, that is 2.6.17. This is no option. Bastian -- Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > Two big issues are still open: > > - hppa FTBFS > > - alpha gcc-4.0 build dependency > > What should we do with them? Finally disable alpha and hppa(64)? I don't think it i

Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next > Thursday, 12th October. Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following issues. > Two big issues are still open: > - hppa FTBFS > - alpha gcc-4

Processed: tagging 362064

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > tags 362064 pending Bug#362064: udev: udev tries to write to an installed, working initrd without asking There were no tags set. Bug#358397: initramfs-tools: Fails to install Tags ad