Hi,
I have prepared the ipw3945-daemon package, following the ITP 391686.
The debian subdirectory can be found in kernel team's svn repo at
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/people/jurij/ipw3945-daemon
The source and binary packages for i386 are available at
http://www.wooyd.org/debian/ipw3945-d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391384 + pending
Bug#391384: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: Compaq Proliant DL380 fails to boot
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
The dailies have switched to 2.6.17, so can this be closed now?
As for the security issue, note that you can turn off sysrq via proc:
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
Of course, if its configured on in the kernel it is on by default, so
we may want to either patch the kernel to initialize sys
hey,
Can you reproduce this bug with the 2.6.18 kernel in sid?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthew Darwin wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686
Version: 2.6.16-18
Severity: normal
% dpkg --purge linux-image-2.6.16-2-686
(Reading database ... 18837 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 ...
Purging configuration files for linux-image-2.6.16-2-
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:09:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that klcc is pointing CC to /usr/local/bin/gcc, but it seems
> this is only the case on amd64.
yes known fact an bNMU was asked:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/09/msg00297.html
> It has:
> $CC = "\/usr\
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:21:43AM +0200, Debian User wrote:
> dann frazier schrob am 13.10.06 16:57 Uhr:
> > Does this bug still exist with the 2.6.18 kernel in sid?
>
> I'd have to try, since I got it working fine with linux 2.4.27 on sarge
> now. Perhaps I can check this next week. I'll tell y
Does this bug still exist with the 2.6.18 kernel in sid?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 2.6.16-1
If this was fixed in 2.6.16-rcX it should still be fixed, so closing.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:52:54 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:46:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Seems fixed in 2.6.18-2.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:52:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Probably fixed in 2.6.18, closing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:57:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed since may or so, closing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > >> I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
> > >> Thursday, 12th October.
>
> >
On Friday 13 October 2006 17:50, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:07PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I would very much like to see 2.6.18 in testing for rc1. Looking at
> > the bug page, I don't really see any indication that 2.6.18 is a
> > regression overall wrt 2.6.17, so
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:07PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would very much like to see 2.6.18 in testing for rc1. Looking at the bug
> page, I don't really see any indication that 2.6.18 is a regression overall
> wrt 2.6.17, so aside from sorting out the hppa build failure, I would say
>
Hi,Sorry, this really should be a debian-user question, but has worked out so hard it looks like I mustask the Experts and document it.I'm testing out an out-of-tree patch (lustre filesystem) and am trying to build a patched xen kernel:
I want to try my patch (linux-patch-lustre . deb) on a Debian
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:25:33AM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
> Dear all,
> I'm currently working on a SSI project named Kerrighed
> (http://kerrighed.org/). I'm packaging this big piece of software which is
> composed of :
> - a patch to the Linux kernel (currently 2.6.11 and 2.6.14) with a m
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:00:46PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:09:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that klcc is pointing CC to /usr/local/bin/gcc, but it seems
> > this is only the case on amd64.
>
> yes known fact an bNMU was asked:
> http:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:54:02AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.18-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: possible filesystem corruption
well it only affects 1k bs, so many users won't notice it.
> Hi release and kernel teams,
>
> Following up to
> http://
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-1
Severity: critical
Justification: possible filesystem corruption
Hi release and kernel teams,
Following up to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/10/msg00183.html :
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wro
Please find it attached.
Il giorno 13/ott/06, alle ore 05:45, Jurij Smakov ha scritto:
Can you please send the output of the 'prtconf -p -v' command to the
bug 392078?
--
Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-12 22:52]:
> > * Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
> >
> > Tomorrow.
>
> FWIW, Falk Hueffn
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362064: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.83
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386441: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.83
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387780: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.83
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385949: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.83
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362064: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.83
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391619: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.83
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382472: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.83
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
* Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-12 22:52]:
> * Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
> Yes.
>
> > Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
>
> Tomorrow.
FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs
t
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.83.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.83.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.83.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.83.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.83_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.83_all.deb
Override entries for yo
initramfs-tools_0.83_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.83.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.83.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.83_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Oct 13, 2006, at 5:45 AM, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 12:56:47PM +1000, Jim Watson wrote:
Hi,
I just installed linux-image-2.6.18-1-sparc64 which I think is the
latest available on debian/unstable.
But booting linux-image-2.6.18-1-sparc64 on sunblade100 fails:
Booting Lin
Dear all,
I'm currently working on a SSI project named Kerrighed
(http://kerrighed.org/). I'm packaging this big piece of software which
is composed of :
- a patch to the Linux kernel (currently 2.6.11 and 2.6.14) with a module
- some tools, libs and docs.
I need your opinion : making a kernel
35 matches
Mail list logo
