Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 387909
Bug#387909: no lasi700 drivers loaded in initrd
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processi
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.84
Followup-For: Bug #387909
Hello,
After installing from a debian etch installer (netinstall, daily built), which
i got of
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/hppa/iso-cd/debian-testing-hppa-netinst.iso,
I was unable to boot my
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 396630 2.6.18-1
Bug#396630: squashfs broken on amd64
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.18-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 396630 linux-modules-extra-2.6
Bug#396630: squashfs broken on amd64
Bug reassigned from package `squashfs' to `linux-modules-extra-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
The bug fix is about to get to upstream:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=116240085420206&w=2
- Alexandre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
> > Come to think of it, this bug might have just appeared on alpha too:
>
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=387498
>
> No, it's not the same bug; the test case for system() works fine on my alpha
> when compiling with -pg.
My current guess about 3
heya,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:13:22PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> We have an urgent fix for ppc pending, thus I would like to upload ASAP
> with what we have now, and make another upload when the other stuff is
> done.
>
> Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:20:43 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Nope, because you can ship the source code and the object file if
> > > you wanted.
> > >
> > > Alr
Your message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:44:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338606: Kernel 2.6.14 break midi play in SB Live
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Hi David:
kernel 2.6.18 doesn't have this bug.
Regars
Waldo
Em Sexta 27 Outubro 2006 14:57, David Schmitt escreveu:
> Hi Waldo!
>
>
> In preparation of the upcoming etch release, would you please
> test if either 2.6.17-9 from testing or 2.6.18-3 from unstable
> now work with your SB Live/MIDI
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:32:28AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Please could you include BadRAM patch ? I missed it *a lot* when my RAM blew
> up and I couldn't boot the system from disk or d-i CD because they all hang.
> :)
>
> http:
On 10/31/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Person C creates a driver knowing with properly names defines and
comments explaining why he does what and where to easily readable
structures of the register mappings of the hardware. Person C then
goes and obfuscates the code into p
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 19:28, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:23:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and
> > would only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing.
>
> OK. What do you think about another 2.6.
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:23:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and would
> only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing.
OK. What do you think about another 2.6.17 release through t-p-u then,
to fix the ppc issue in testing
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 16:13, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for
> everyone... comments?
urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and would
only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing.
Personally I'd
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:41:02PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello Jurij,
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:35:49AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > I have one important fix in the pipe (boot failure on SunBlade1000). A
> > patch for it was posted recently, and I've just received a
> > confir
Hello Jurij,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:35:49AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I have one important fix in the pipe (boot failure on SunBlade1000). A
> patch for it was posted recently, and I've just received a
> confirmation that it fixes the problem. I'll build a test kernel
> tonight and make
* Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-01 16:13]:
> Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for
> everyone... comments?
I made some changes to ARM but they're all tested so it's fine with
me.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hello,
We have an urgent fix for ppc pending, thus I would like to upload ASAP
with what we have now, and make another upload when the other stuff is
done.
Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for
everyone... comments?
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
si
RD1DNT1DRT1DOT1DRT1EOT89?=
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:14:32 +0480
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="koi8-r";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2
QzU9Q0MgPUM1PUMyPUQxPUQ0PUQ4Pz8/LD89?=
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:38:32 +0480
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="koi8-r";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Ex
Hi betsy,
Our office can negotiate.
www.canzant.com/16r
Get in touch with my office and get a 3.97% decrease.
Respects,
Allen Stephan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:14:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line marking as done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
On Oct 31, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO, DFSG#2 refers to source code, as is usually defined, that is to
> say, as in the GNU GPL v2.
No, it does not. As usual, you are just inventing new requirements which
are not specified by the DFSG.
> Deliberately obfuscated code is absol
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please could you include BadRAM patch ? I missed it *a lot* when my RAM blew
up and I couldn't boot the system from disk or d-i CD because they all hang. :)
http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 387498 serious
Bug#387498: mipsel: system() hangs when compiled with -pg (gprof profiling)
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:17:10AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Then try that and make sure the hypervisor has no 32/64 bit
> problems.
Hypervisor/kernel/tools must match register size, the other parts of the
userspace not.
Bastian
--
It is a human characteristic to love little animals,
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
Version: 2.6.18-3
Severity: normal
I have been rolling my own kernels on this machine (Thinkpad A21m,
Debian testing) for a long time, but really don't need to anymore, so I
thought I would install the stock kernel images.
Alas, with the stock images (both linux
Hi, ...
I just had a look at the 10 RC bugs we have open for linux-2.6, here it is :
- 4 bugs are for firmware and doc non-freeness or whatever.
- 392818: ext3 corruption issue in 2.6.18 found by RedHat
Maks you commented on it last, any information about a fix ?
- 393451: linux-image
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 396471 grave
Bug#396471: linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp: fails to install
Bug#395110: linux-2.6: cannot configure linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7 package:
Missing Required parameter 'Old' at
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7.postinst
Seve
30 matches
Mail list logo
