Re: 2.6.20-1-amd64 fails to mount root FS on etch

2007-04-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 18:16, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Installing linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64 (and maybe also -486, I've not > tested it) on etch seems to fail the boot, at least on my system. The > boot hangs "Waiting for root filesystem". Of course 2.6.18-4-amd64 > boots correctly. This was inte

Bug#414932: Info received (Bug#414932: linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx: xfs partition from x86 system can not be used on arm)

2007-04-26 Thread Eric Sandeen
Maybe the alignment isn't broken; it's just "special" - I guess there are no actual rules on how the structure must be aligned... hmm... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#414932: linux-image-2.6.18-4-ixp4xx: xfs partition from x86 system can not be used on arm

2007-04-26 Thread Eric Sandeen
Root cause seems to be gcc misaligning the xfs shortform directory structures. In the example below, bar.parent has offset 4, while boo.parent has offset 2. The union seems to cause extra padding - I believe "c" should be at offset 2 in both structures. This is leading to trouble in xfs_dir2

Re: Which kernel should I use on a Dual Processor 10 GB RAM Intel server?

2007-04-26 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi, this box should support a 64bit kernel, check /proc/cpuinfo for the lm flag. On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:34:32AM +0200, Oliver König wrote: > I have got a Dell Poweredge 2850 Rackserver with two 3.0 GHZ Xeon CPUs and 10 > GB of RAM running Debian Sarge and kernel 2.4.27 (SMP). The system reco

2.6.20-1-amd64 fails to mount root FS on etch

2007-04-26 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi all, I'm not sure if this has already been reported, I've searched among the reports but I couldn't find anything similar. Installing linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64 (and maybe also -486, I've not tested it) on etch seems to fail the boot, at least on my system. The boot hangs "Waiting for root fil

Bug#416098: marked as done (MegaRAID SAS adapter locks up)

2007-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:07:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416098: kills my server on install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#416098: kills my server on install

2007-04-26 Thread Bart Cortooms
On Apr 26, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: Hm. We might not have flashed with the most recent version, then? Where did you get your version from? http://tinyurl.com/2zllnn - file FRMW_LX_R149666.BIN It's dated 4/10/2007, so I guess there was another release recently --

Bug#416098: kills my server on install

2007-04-26 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:14:57PM +0200, Bart Cortooms wrote: > The fault is definitely with the RAID controller. I had the exact > same problem on 4 Dell PE 2950's, triggered by munin and was able to > solve it by upgrading the firmware on the RAID controllers. Hm. We upgraded the PERC firmw

Bug#421151: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: reads the same inode twice

2007-04-26 Thread Dan Jacobson
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 Severity: minor Just want to let you know Linux can say things like $ ls -ogi|grep xls 3354 -rw-r--r-- 1 142848 2007-04-09 14:06 ??.xls 3354 -rw-r--r-- 1 142848 2007-04-09 14:06 ??.xls It is stuck on the first inode just becaus

Bug#416098: kills my server on install

2007-04-26 Thread Bart Cortooms
On Mar 26, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Tore Anderson wrote: I googled this error message and it seems a lot of people have seen lockups with this SAS adapter (without there being any mention of Munin). Unless you can reproduce this I agree with Stephen that the kernel (or hardware) is at the prime su

Bug#421110: marked as done (Upgrading linux-image-2.6.20-1-686-bigmem should never happen)

2007-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:19:12 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421110: Upgrading linux-image-2.6.20-1-686-bigmem should never happen has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#421110: Upgrading linux-image-2.6.20-1-686-bigmem should never happen

2007-04-26 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:51:17AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I.e. it would require an explicit command on my part to install the newer > kernel. Just put it on hold. echo linux-image-2.6.20-1-686-bigmem hold | sudo dpkg --set-selections -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#421110: Upgrading linux-image-2.6.20-1-686-bigmem should never happen

2007-04-26 Thread Stefan Monnier
Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686-bigmem Version: 2.6.20-3 Severity: normal When upgrading the package used by the currently running kernel, the package installer give a big warning about how it's dangerous and requires a prompt reboot. In my case I'd much rather that such things simply *never* h

Re: Which kernel should I use on a Dual Processor 10 GB RAM Intel server?

2007-04-26 Thread Otavio Salvador
Oliver König <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In Etch I found linux-image-2.6.18-4-686-bigmem, which supports 2-64 GB RAM. > Does this kernel provide symmetric multiprocessing or do I need to build a > custom kernel? bigmem flavour should work fine for what you need :-) -- O T A V I O

Bug#421078: linux-image-2.6.10: Does not find initramfs-tools

2007-04-26 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:28:40AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Setting up linux-image-2.6.20-1-k7 (2.6.20-3) ... > Running depmod. > Finding valid ramdisk creators. > Failed to find suitable ramdisk generation tool for kernel version > 2.6.20-1-k7 on running kernel 2.6.18 in /usr/sbin/mkinitrd.yai

Bug#420602: kernel fails to boot on SunBlade 100

2007-04-26 Thread Kolargol double zero
Hi Ema, OK. Can you log in via ssh booting without atyfb:off? No, I can't. :( Thanks for your help. Regards, Etienne _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com

Bug#406111: fix i965 etch kernel support

2007-04-26 Thread Paolo Cavallini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 so that's the issue, I believe. pc maximilian attems ha scritto: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:13:16PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Sorry, still does not work for me: >>> aptitude instal

Bug#406111: fix i965 etch kernel support

2007-04-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:13:16PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Sorry, still does not work for me: > > aptitude install linux-image-2.6.18-5-amd64 > > Impossibile trovare un pacchetto il cui nome o descrizione corrispondano > > a «li

Bug#406111: fix i965 etch kernel support

2007-04-26 Thread maximilian attems
[ please CC this *bug report*, if i don't get it right than correct me, but this is in no way a private conversation ;) ] On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:04:06PM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sorry, still does not work for me: > aptitude install

Processed: Re: Bug#421078: linux-image-2.6.10: Does not find initramfs-tools

2007-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 421078 linux-2.6 Bug#421078: linux-image-2.6.10: Does not find initramfs-tools Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `linux-2.6'. > retitle 421078 linux-image-2.6.20: Does not find initramfs-tools Bug#421078: linux-image-2.6.10: Does not

Processed: Re: Bug#421078: Acknowledgement (linux-image-2.6.10: Does not find initramfs-tools)

2007-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 421078 "linux-image-2.6.20: Does not find initramfs-tools" Bug#421078: linux-image-2.6.20: Does not find initramfs-tools Changed Bug title to "linux-image-2.6.20: Does not find initramfs-tools" from linux-image-2.6.20: Does not find initramfs-t

Bug#421078: Acknowledgement (linux-image-2.6.10: Does not find initramfs-tools)

2007-04-26 Thread Tobias Frost
retitle 421078 "linux-image-2.6.20: Does not find initramfs-tools" thanks Correcting typo in title -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#421078: linux-image-2.6.10: Does not find initramfs-tools

2007-04-26 Thread Tobias Frost
Package: linux-image-2.6.20.3 Version: 3 Severity: normal If initramfs-tools are installed, the kernel fails to install with this message: Setting up linux-image-2.6.20-1-k7 (2.6.20-3) ... Running depmod. Finding valid ramdisk creators. Failed to find suitable ramdisk generation tool for kernel

Processed: reassign 421078 to linux-2.6

2007-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > reassign 421078 linux-2.6 Bug#421078: linux-image-2.6.10: Does not find initramfs-tools Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.20.3' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.20

Which kernel should I use on a Dual Processor 10 GB RAM Intel server?

2007-04-26 Thread Oliver König
Hello, I have got a Dell Poweredge 2850 Rackserver with two 3.0 GHZ Xeon CPUs and 10 GB of RAM running Debian Sarge and kernel 2.4.27 (SMP). The system recognizes only 4 GB of RAM and I want to upgrade to Debian 4.0 (etch) and kernel 2.6.18. I need a kernel that recognizes both CPUs (SMP) and th