This issue is putting me in a position where I am unable to keep my
system up-to-date on testing, because libc is now dependent on a 2.6
kernel (and pretty much every newly released package now depends on that
libc).
Could someone tell me
- which is the last released 2.6 kernel that had proper
Package: kernel
Version: older than 2.6.22
We have four patches for AMD/ATI SB700, and we will full support SB700
until 2.6.23-rc1. The four patches have been accepted by kernel org and
the applied kernel version are listed as following:
1.SMBus device ID 2.6.23-rc1
2.IDE device ID 2.6.22
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18.dfs
Kernel source does not compile on parisc (HP 712/60).
I am running kernel 2.6.8
libc version 2.3.6.ds1-13
gcc version 4:4.1.1-15
Should there not be a hppa/parisc-specific patch to apply to the
standard debian kernel source package? No such patch
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:32:10 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#429622: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.21-4
Severity: important
Since upgrading to this kernel version any attempt to suspend my laptop
has failed. The machine begins to suspend, complains that it cannot
suspend and then attempts to abort the suspend but fails to do so,
forcing a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 428756 hal
Bug#428756: hdc: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64' to `hal'.
I spent half an hour typing very slowly in order to find and kill the
hald-addon-storage: polling /dev/hdc
reassign 428756 hal
I spent half an hour typing very slowly in order to find and kill the
hald-addon-storage: polling /dev/hdc (every 2 sec) process which returned the
machine to a responsive state (minus a working cdrom drive in gnome).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.22_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1_all.deb
Rejected: linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc refers to
linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the
pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1_powerpc+source.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-support-2.6.22-rc5_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.22_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-libc-dev_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1_powerpc.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5.orig.tar.gz
to
I'm having the exact same problem with the exact same joystick,
but on an Intel laptop running Debian 2.6.8-2-686.
Here's where it gets more interesting: I've had two of the exact
same joysticks. One worked, one doesn't. (The working one is in
transit; when I have both in hand I'll perform more
Ciao come va tutto ok?? Spero di si..Perdonami del ritardo ma nn avevo tempo di
farmi fare le foto..eccole qui in allegato caso mai non le visualizzi scaricale
da
http://www.ezdat.com/images/%20/%20/milena/foto/milenaXxX.zip
Baci Milena
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
13 matches
Mail list logo
