Re: [kernel] r9069 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree: . debian iwl3945

Bastian Blank wrote: >> Log: >> Added iwl3945 firwmare, version 2.14.4. > > We don't need one package per file. so you'd rather want one for both iwl things, like.. firmware-iwlwifi? i personally like it better, to have them separated, not because upstream makes also two packages, but because 99

Re: [kernel] r9067 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/debian: . templates

Bastian Blank wrote: >> Log: > > What? that one was a mistake, sorry. The log should have been, for that very commit: * Building against 2.6.21-2. * Added myself to uploaders. >> -Uploaders: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frederik Schüler <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]>, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL

Re: [kernel] r9069 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree: . debian iwl3945

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:23:44PM +, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Author: daniel > Date: Wed Jul 4 23:23:43 2007 > New Revision: 9069 > > Log: > Added iwl3945 firwmare, version 2.14.4. We don't need one package per file. Bastian -- Immortality consists largely of boredom. -- Z

Re: [kernel] r9067 - in dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/debian: . templates

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:17:28PM +, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Author: daniel > Date: Wed Jul 4 23:17:27 2007 > New Revision: 9067 > > Log: What? > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > Section: non-free/base > Priority: optional > Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team > -Uploaders: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian

Hi dann, Without the quirk function for SB600, if the SATA type is set as legacy IDE in the system BIOS, SATA HDD will not be detected while installing OS. SB700 also supports legacy IDE mode too, so we need the same quirk function. Besides the modes in SB600, there is one more mode in SB700, th

Processed: tagging 393469

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 393469 + pending Bug#393469: Please advertize the version of the firmwares There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contac

Bug#414953: marked as done (firmware-ipw3945: Please use newer firmware version)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Jul 2007 02:29:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line firmware-ipw3945: Please use newer firmware version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #425851 # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8710 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags

firmware-nonfree_0.5_i386.changes is NEW

firmware-ipw3945-di_0.5_all.udeb to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-ipw3945-di_0.5_all.udeb firmware-ipw3945_0.5_all.deb to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-ipw3945_0.5_all.deb (new) firmware-iwl3945-di_0.5_all.udeb optional non-free/debian-installer Binary firmware for IWL39

Processing of firmware-nonfree_0.5_i386.changes

firmware-nonfree_0.5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: firmware-nonfree_0.5.dsc firmware-nonfree_0.5.tar.gz firmware-ipw3945_0.5_all.deb firmware-ipw3945-di_0.5_all.udeb firmware-iwl3945_0.5_all.deb firmware-iwl3945-di_0.5_all.udeb firmware-iwl4965_

Bug#430972: Patch

tag 430972 patch thanks Even though build on hppa seems to be fixed upstream with -rc7, there is still a patch needed for the Debian config. Please apply the following patch in trunk. Index: debian/arch/hppa/config === --- debian/arc

Processed: Patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 430972 patch Bug#430972: linux-2.6_2.6.22~rc5-1~experimental.1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: configuration problem There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tra

firmware-nonfree_0.5_i386.changes REJECTED

Rejected: Unknown distribution `UNRELEASED'. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#372465: marked as done (Kernel oops every days at 6h25 am in vfs_getattr)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Jul 2007 01:39:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Kernel oops every days at 6h25 am in vfs_getattr has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Processing of firmware-nonfree_0.5_i386.changes

firmware-nonfree_0.5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: firmware-nonfree_0.5.dsc firmware-nonfree_0.5.tar.gz firmware-ipw3945_0.5_all.deb firmware-ipw3945-di_0.5_all.udeb firmware-iwl3945_0.5_all.deb firmware-iwl3945-di_0.5_all.udeb firmware-iwl4965_

Custom kernel in d-i

Hello *, I hope this is the right list. I'm trying to build a d-i image with a custom kernel (2.6.21.5) following the instructions at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Modify/CustomKernel However when I $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot I get: [...] kernel-wedge copy-modules 2.6.21.5 486

Bug#431751: marked as done (ipw3945.ko missing from ipw3945-modules package on 686.)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431751: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#430904: marked as done (ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-amd64: no module shipped in package)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431751: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#430646: marked as done (ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686: module missing from package)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431751: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#431751: marked as done (ipw3945.ko missing from ipw3945-modules package on 686.)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430646: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#431751: marked as done (ipw3945.ko missing from ipw3945-modules package on 686.)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430904: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#430904: marked as done (ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-amd64: no module shipped in package)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430904: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#430646: marked as done (ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686: module missing from package)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430646: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#430646: marked as done (ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686: module missing from package)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430904: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#430904: marked as done (ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-amd64: no module shipped in package)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430646: fixed in linux-modules-contrib-2.6 2.6.21-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.21-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: ipw2100-modules-2.6-486_2.6.21-3_i386.deb to pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/ipw2100-modules-2.6-486_2.6.21-3_i386.deb ipw2100-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.21-3_i386.deb to pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/ipw2100-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.21-3_i386.deb ipw2100-modu

Processing of linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.21-3_i386.changes

linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.21-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.21-3.dsc linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.21-3.tar.gz ipw2100-modules-2.6.21-2-486_2.6.21+1.2.2-3_i386.deb ipw2100-modules-2.6-486_2.6.21-3_i386.deb ipw2200

Processed: tagging 430646

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 430646 + pending Bug#430646: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686: module missing from package There were no tags set. Bug#430904: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-amd64: no module shipped in pa

Processed: tagging 431751

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 431751 + pending Bug#431751: ipw3945.ko missing from ipw3945-modules package on 686. Tags were: pending Bug#430646: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686: module missing from package Bug#

Processed: tagging 430904

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 430904 + pending Bug#430904: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-amd64: no module shipped in package Tags were: pending Bug#430646: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686: module missing from package

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 430646 linux-modules-contrib-2.6 Bug#430646: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686: module missing from package Bug reassigned from package `ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686' to `linux-modules-contrib-2.6'. > reassign 430904 linux-modules-contrib-2.6 Bug#

Processed: Re: individual module versions could be clearer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Reassigning bug to main conglomeration package. > reassign 418179 linux-modules-extra-2.6 Bug#418179: individual module versions could be clearer Bug reassigned from package `linux-modules-contrib-2.6' to `linux-modules-extra-2.6'. > thanks Stopping

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Reassigning module bugs from conglomeration package to the > # modules-source > reassign 414695 ipw2100 Bug#414695: module package descriptions don't say you need firmware Bug reassigned from package `ipw2100-modules-2.6-686' to `ipw2100'. > reassign

linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.21-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.21-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.21-4_i386.deb gspca-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.21-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/gspca-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.21-4_i386.deb gspca-modules-2.6-686_2.6.21-4_

linux-modules-extra-2.6 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): unionfs-modules-2.6-486_2.6.21-4_i386.deb: package says section is admin, override says misc. unionfs-modules-2.6-686_2.6.21-4_i386.deb: package says section is admin, override says misc.

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Reassigning bug from conglomeration package to the failing package > reassign 426769 redhat-cluster Bug#426769: gnbd.ko block device not packaged Bug reassigned from package `linux-modules-extra-2.6' to `redhat-cluster'. > reassign 396220 redhat-clus

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Reassigning bug from conglomeration package to the failing package > reassign 396220 redhat-cluster-module Bug#396220: linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k Warning: Unknown package 'redhat-cluster-module' Bug reassigned

Processing of linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.21-4_i386.changes

linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.21-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.21-4.dsc linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.21-4.tar.gz gspca-modules-2.6.21-2-486_2.6.21+01.00.18-4_i386.deb gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.21-4_i386.deb squashfs-module

Bug#430646: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 19:53 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi debian-kernel ;) > > for those of you who dont read debian-devel... :-) > > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:14, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. > > Thomas, if you think that

Re: what's up with #430646?

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:57 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > What's up with bug #430646? The kernel team has (AFAICT) ignored the > > existence of the bug. > > can you calm down a bit please? I'm perfectly calm. All I was asking for was a status report on the bug, n

Bug#430646: who are the kernel maintainers?

Hi debian-kernel ;) for those of you who dont read debian-devel... :-) On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:14, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. Thomas, if you think that a bug has fallen under the radar of a maintainers team, why do you send

Bug#431751: ipw3945.ko missing from ipw3945-modules package on 686.

Package: ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-2-686 Version: 2.6.21+1.2.1-2 Severity: grave The driver for the Intel Pro Wireless 3945ABG (ipw3945.ko) is missing from the ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-2-686 package. Also affected was the now-superseded ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-1-686; suspect build problem. Marking s

Re: what's up with #430646?

Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > What's up with bug #430646? The kernel team has (AFAICT) ignored the > existence of the bug. can you calm down a bit please? First of all, this is unstable, you know, the distribution which can have breakages from time to time... Second, I do not upload new packages

what's up with #430646?

What's up with bug #430646? The kernel team has (AFAICT) ignored the existence of the bug. The version number of the buggy package looks like a bin-NMU, but I really don't know b/c it's confusing to me. The package is ipw3945-modules-2.6.21-2-686; the version number is 2.6.21+1.2.1-2. I don't k

Re: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:55:35AM +0800, Shane Huang wrote: > Hi Dann: > > > > Do you know of any reason these changes wouldn't work on a 2.6.18 > > base? Would you be able to run QA on one of our daily builds if I > > pointed you to snapshot debs with these changes? > > I'm sorry that I do not

Bug#426941: marked as done (cannot set default locale)

Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:39:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426941: cannot set default locale has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: tagging 426941

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > tags 426941 unreproducible Bug#426941: cannot set default locale Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#426941: cannot set default locale

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 426941 unpreproducible Unknown tag/s: unpreproducible. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-

Bug#426941: cannot set default locale

tags 426941 unpreproducible thanks The problem has since fixed itself. Sorry, I failed to capture more information when I encountered it. Feel free to close. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.d

Bug#431657: Is it really an ipw3945d package bug ?

Hello, I have exactly the same behaviour on my laptop with Etch installed and a device driven by madwifi module... I suspect that the DHCP client start too early, before connection / authentication is done... only a supposition... with regards, Frédéric.