Bug#468112: Initramfs generation reliability fixes.

Sorry I haven't gotten back to you until now. On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:53:44AM EST, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Luke Yelavich wrote: > > > Attached is a patch to improve the way update-initramfs handles the > > generating of new or updated initramfs images for kernels. It pu

Bug#473075: /dev/disk/by-id/ata* in fstab

Totally weird. Today /dev/disk/by-id/ata* in fstab couldn't be dealt with upon boot, but I still could login as root (with only the root partition mounted), whereupon I did reboot(8), and miraculously this time the boot went smoothly! So one does not need to rerun lilo, nor change /etc/fstab at al

linux-2.6 2.6.24-5 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the linux-2.6 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.6.24-4 Current version: 2.6.24-5 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

Bug#463751: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: iwlwifi module don't accept dhcp request

Hi, I had a problem similar to yours, but today I finally got iwlwifi to work! Have you tried different values for wpa-scan-ssid and wpa-ap-scan? 0 and 1 respectively were the winning combination for me... There was one other thing that screwed me big time when switching from ipw3945 to iwlwifi: I

Bug#474200: irmware-iwlwifi: firmware sometimes hangs machine, upgrade needed

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:20:52PM +0200, Thomas Zander wrote: > > The versions includes (2.14.1.5 and 4.44.1.20) are the newest. > Not sure how they number; but .4 seems higher than .1.5 to me... > http://intellinuxwireless.org/iwlwifi/downloads/iwlwifi-3945-ucode-2.14.4.tgz > I used this link and

Bug#474200: irmware-iwlwifi: firmware sometimes hangs machine, upgrade needed

On Friday 4. April 2008 12:19:54 Bastian Blank wrote: > > I went to the intel website and downloaded the newest firmware. A week > > later I have not seen any of the above problems anymore. > > Please consider upgrading the firmware in debian to the latest released. > > The versions includes (2.14.

Bug#469095: Wifi led does not turns on

There's a discussion of this bug and patches at: http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1209 Probably this should be reassigned to the kernel. Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#474691: Can't resume from swap file hibernation (as opposed to partition)

On Mon, 07 Apr 2008, Alan Jenkins wrote: > To resume from a swap file within a partition using the original swsusp, > you find the block offset of the swap file header using e.g. swap-offset > from the uswsusp package, and add "resume=" and > "resume_offset=" parameters to the kernel command

Bug#474691: Can't resume from swap file hibernation (as opposed to partition)

tags 474691 pending stop On Mon, 07 Apr 2008, Alan Jenkins wrote: > To resume from a swap file within a partition using the original swsusp, > you find the block offset of the swap file header using e.g. swap-offset > from the uswsusp package, and add "resume=" and > "resume_offset=" parame

Bug#474648: please re-enable CONFIG_SECCOMP, it's harmless (and needed)

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:21:24AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: > >Okay, but I'm not asking for CONFIG_SECCOMP_DISABLE_TSC, just > > CONFIG_SECCOMP, which is completely harmless (unless you can tell me > > where the harm is). > > it adds useless bl

Bug#474648: please re-enable CONFIG_SECCOMP, it's harmless (and needed)

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:21:24AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: >Okay, but I'm not asking for CONFIG_SECCOMP_DISABLE_TSC, just > CONFIG_SECCOMP, which is completely harmless (unless you can tell me > where the harm is). it adds useless bloat. the SECCOMP_DISABLE_TSC is crazy, that is adding a co

Processed: Re: Bug#474691: Can't resume from swap file hibernation (as opposed to partition)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 474691 pending Bug#474691: Can't resume from swap file hibernation (as opposed to partition) Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#474648: please re-enable CONFIG_SECCOMP, it's harmless (and needed)

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:47:56AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: > > > > CONFIG_SECCOMP was disabled for performance reasons, but it has always > > been harmless. Quoting the author: > > > > | On x86-64 SECCOMP generates absoutely zero performance hit

Bug#457044: Can I upgrade without risk of hang up ?

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:08:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > As there is a new upgrade on package linux-image-2.6 > I'm wondering if I can apply this upgrade without risk of hanging one more > time my production server ? you never provided any error message, so your bug repor

Bug#474648: please re-enable CONFIG_SECCOMP, it's harmless (and needed)

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 07:51:41AM +, maximilian attems wrote: > that is a commercial entity, no need to push that. > > unless something substantial comes up that bug can be close right away. It seems that you're not really forced to use the commercial side. CPUShare may be use freely if you

Bug#474691: Can't resume from swap file hibernation (as opposed to partition)

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.91e Severity: wishlist Tags: patch To resume from a swap file within a partition using the original swsusp, you find the block offset of the swap file header using e.g. swap-offset from the uswsusp package, and add "resume=" and "resume_offset=" parameters t

Processed: severity of 457044 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > severity 457044 important Bug#457044: My box doesn't reboot after each upgrade of linux-image Severity set to `important' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#457044: Can I upgrade without risk of hang up ?

Hello, As there is a new upgrade on package linux-image-2.6 I'm wondering if I can apply this upgrade without risk of hanging one more time my production server ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 457044 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20 > severity 457044 important Bug#457044: My box doesn't reboot after each upgrade of linux-image Severity set to `important' from `critical' > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#474648: please re-enable CONFIG_SECCOMP, it's harmless (and needed)

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:47:56AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: > > CONFIG_SECCOMP was disabled for performance reasons, but it has always > been harmless. Quoting the author: > > | On x86-64 SECCOMP generates absoutely zero performance hit. > | > | The original seccomp patch for x86 also genera

Processed: change

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 457044 critical Bug#457044: My box doesn't reboot after each upgrade of linux-image Severity set to `critical' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: help

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 457044 My box doesn't reboot after each upgrade of linux-image Bug#457044: My box didn't reboot after upgrading linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 Changed Bug title to `My box doesn't reboot after each upgrade of linux-image' from `My box didn't reboot a