Re: EDAC Support

2008-05-17 Thread Armin ranjbar
On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:51:03 +0200 maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After upgrading to 2.6.25 , IDE-CDROM issue seems fixed , but not for EDAC , by installing Ubuntu i have noticed that exactly same errors are happening there in dmesg and i guess this is upstream bug not debian one ,

Re: Question about time indices during boot process with new (= 2.6.25) kernel images

2008-05-17 Thread Daniel Baumann
Fabian Greffrath wrote: since I have upgraded my linux-image package to 2.6.25, time indices appear in brackets at the beginning of each kernel message line during the boot process. I have never encountered these indices with previous kernels ( 2.6.25). this is CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y. Are

Re: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-17 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:13:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:30:58AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:31:40PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote: I'm not a maintainer, but I did

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.25-3_m68k.changes

2008-05-17 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.25-3_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb linux-image-2.6.25-2-atari_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6.25-2-atari_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb

linux-2.6_2.6.25-3_m68k.changes is NEW

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Installer
(new) linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all-m68k_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb optional devel All header files for Linux 2.6.25 This package depends against all architecture-specific kernel header files for Linux kernel version 2.6.25, generally used for building out-of-tree kernel modules.

Processed: reopening 481436

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27 reopen 481436 Bug#481436: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: Unable to use wireless with Intel iwl3945 module. 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may

Re: EDAC Support

2008-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:48:08AM +0430, Armin ranjbar wrote: On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:51:03 +0200 maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After upgrading to 2.6.25 , IDE-CDROM issue seems fixed , but not for EDAC , by installing Ubuntu i have noticed that exactly same errors are

Bug#481595: [linux-image-2.6-sparc64] Network interface eth0 could not be brought up

2008-05-17 Thread Mazen NEIFER
Package: linux-image-2.6-sparc64 Version: 2.6.24+13 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I have a PCI Sun Happy Meal network controller card which is working well with 2.6.22-3. However with 2.6.24-1 and above could not use network anymore --- System

Processed: severity of 481595 is important

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27 severity 481595 important Bug#481595: [linux-image-2.6-sparc64] Network interface eth0 could not be brought up Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping

Bug#481595: [linux-image-2.6-sparc64] Network interface eth0 could not be brought up

2008-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:23:36AM +0200, Mazen NEIFER wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6-sparc64 Version: 2.6.24+13 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- ??I have a PCI Sun Happy Meal network controller card which is working well with 2.6.22-3. However

Bug#481436: closed by maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#481436: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: Unable to use wireless with Intel iwl3945 module.)

2008-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 16 May 2008, 洪任諭 wrote: 2008/5/16 maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 16 May 2008, 洪任諭 wrote: I have read http://wiki.debian.org/iwlwifi last week, but that didn't help at all. After reading your suggestion, I've upgrade to debian sid with kernel 2.6.25-2-686.

Re: Processed: info that it has *not* been dealt with

2008-05-17 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:33:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: But the maintainer does, and for a change this request doesn't conflict with the Social Contract. Why are we discussing on whether we prefer one bug or multiple bugs when we have actual SC violations right now that need fixing?

Processed: Re: Bug#481613: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: After resuming from suspend-to-ram, there is no sound

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 481613 linux-2.6 Bug#481613: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: After resuming from suspend-to-ram, there is no sound Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64' to `linux-2.6'.

Bug#481554: Cannot find vmlinux

2008-05-17 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.25-1 I need a vmlinux (not vmlinuz) in order to use oprofile, but this file doesn't seem to be included in any of the binary packages. Juliusz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#481613: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: After resuming from suspend-to-ram, there is no sound

2008-05-17 Thread Sam Morris
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.25-1 Severity: normal After I come back from sleep, there is no sound until I remove and re-insert the snd-hda-intel module. Fiddling with the mixer makes no difference. 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio

Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2008-05-17 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #381242 # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7815 # * remote status changed: NEW - CLOSED # *

Bug#480310: [ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 fails to boot with 2.6.25

2008-05-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could confirm it works. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#481595: [linux-image-2.6-sparc64] Network interface eth0 could not be brought up

2008-05-17 Thread Mazen NEIFER
I've tried with 2.6.25-2 and it doesn't work at all. The driver (sunhme) load OK according to dmesg, but ifup eth gives the following error. SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address Failed to bring up eth0 Cheers, Mazen, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#480310: [ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 fails to boot with 2.6.25

2008-05-17 Thread Kevin Price
Martin Michlmayr schrieb: This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could confirm it works. Yes, confirmed. It works nicely for me. I re-flashed the old apex from debian, and set modules=most in

Processed: Bug is corrected

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 464933 + fixed-upstream patch Bug#464933: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: r8169 doesn't work with 2.6.24 (regression from 2.6.23) There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream, patch -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Sat May 17 20:03:18 UTC 2008 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: linux-2.6 tags 480130 + pending Bug#480130: perl: FTBFS on alpha: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared

Bug#464933: Bug is corrected

2008-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
tags: patch -- ROUCARIES Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- DO NOT WRITE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR BE BLACKLISTED -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#464933: Bug is corrected

2008-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
hi, I get the same bug look like to be: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10301 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081 Patch: commit 9dc625e72309e1c919ea3e7f51d0ffca96123787 Author: Peer Chen email address hidden Date: Mon Feb 4 23:50:13 2008 -0800 PCI: quirks:

Bug#464933: Bug is corrected

2008-05-17 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
tags: fixed-upstream -- ROUCARIES Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- DO NOT WRITE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR BE BLACKLISTED -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: this bug is shared

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 464933 linux-2.6 Bug#464933: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: r8169 doesn't work with 2.6.24 (regression from 2.6.23) Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64' to `linux-2.6'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: Fwd: Bug is corrected

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forcemerge 464933 465510 Bug#464933: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: r8169 doesn't work with 2.6.24 (regression from 2.6.23) Bug#465510: linux-image-2.6.24.2: r8169 doesn't work with 2.6.24.2 Forcibly Merged 464933 465510. End of message, stopping

Processed: your mail

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 464933 2.6.23 Bug#464933: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: r8169 doesn't work with 2.6.24 (regression from 2.6.23) Bug#465510: linux-image-2.6.24.2: r8169 doesn't work with 2.6.24.2 Bug no longer marked as found in version 2.6.23. found 464933

Bug#481684: Please enable CONFIG_LATENCYTOP so we can use the latencytop tool

2008-05-17 Thread Uwe Hermann
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 Version: 2.6.25-3 Severity: normal Hi, please consider enabling CONFIG_LATENCYTOP in the kernel, as it's needed for the 'latencytop' utility to work. latencytop itself is already in unstable. See also http://latencytop.org/. The current kernels have

linux-2.6_2.6.25-3_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all-m68k_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all-m68k_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all_2.6.25-3_m68k.deb

Bug#480310: [ixp4xx] armel NSLU2 fails to boot with 2.6.25

2008-05-17 Thread Paul Collins
Kevin Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin Michlmayr schrieb: This has been fixed in version 2.6.25-3 of linux-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx which is now in unstable. Would be great if you (Paul, Kevin) could confirm it works. Yes, confirmed. It works nicely for me. Works great here too.

Bug#476890: NFSv4 works on 2.6.25

2008-05-17 Thread Duns Ens
I have switched to the unstable kernel for now. The kernel backtraces are gone and I can resume successfully from disk. The only problem at the moment is that I have to kill and restart wpa_supplicant manually as the iwl3945 driver does not reassign itself to the network automatically. Should