On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:54:03PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> can you still reproduce that with an uptodate kernel
> at best 2.6.25? it has newer ipv6 with more features and fixes?
I haven't encountered the problem in a long time.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 03:18:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: Please consider either relaxing script
name requirements or issuing a warning on ignored scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #464788,
regarding initramfs-tools: Please
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 03:18:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: Please consider either relaxing script
name requirements or issuing a warning on ignored scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #464788,
regarding initramfs-tools: Please
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#489186: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.92d
has caused the Debian Bug report #489186,
regarding mention UUID
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#485786: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.92d
has caused the Debian Bug report #485786,
regarding initramfs-tools: support for ide-generic for Lenny
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#488963: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.92d
has caused the Debian Bug report #488963,
regarding please provide break at the top of mountroot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.92d.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92d.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.92d.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92d.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.92d_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92d_all.deb
Override entries
This problem turned out to be a hardware fault/BIOS bug anyway.
The Athlon 64 x2 939 devices can't support 4 DIMMs at 400MHz, only up to
2 (or 3). 4 devices needs to be slowed down to 333MHz. I expect this is
due to excessive capacitance inside the chip.
The BIOS is supposed to be aware of these
initramfs-tools_0.92d_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.92d.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.92d.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.92d_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:56:59PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
Look at that: (updating initrd, duplicates the content of the cryptroot
config file...)
right cryptsetup should maybe not write into /etc/i-t/conf.d
but in /usr/share/i-t/conf.d but those could also be mounted ro?!?
anyway i'd
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> Please provide a maybe_break hook right at the top of mountroot,
> after running the ${BOOT}-top scripts and before mounting root.
>
> I would suggest to rename the hooks as follows and call the new hook
> mount.
>
> top -> init
> mount -> top
>
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 01:24:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: Still confused when initrd doesn't exist
has caused the Debian Bug report #402386,
regarding initramfs-tools: Still confused when initrd doesn't exist
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 01:20:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: With crypted LVM, tries to start LVM
before decryption
has caused the Debian Bug report #485789,
regarding initramfs-tools: With crypted LVM, tries to start LVM before
decr
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> initramfs runs executable scripts in scripts/*/* at various stages.
> Albeit an error by the user or the package, scripts without
> executable permissions get copied to the initrd by the hooks, but
> then they don't get executed.
>
> Maybe initramfs c
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#481196: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.92c
has caused the Debian Bug report #481196,
regarding initramfs-tools: please document the behavior of 'break' when 'panic'
is passed along with
to be m
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475430: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.92c
has caused the Debian Bug report #475430,
regarding backup_initramfs not documented on update-initramfs.conf.5.gz
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#483431: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.92c
has caused the Debian Bug report #483431,
regarding please include drivers for OLPC MMC controller
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.92c.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92c.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.92c.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92c.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.92c_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.92c_all.deb
Override entries
initramfs-tools_0.92c_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.92c.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.92c.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.92c_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 00:19:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: update-initramfs: ro_bootcheck fix.
has caused the Debian Bug report #468116,
regarding update-initramfs: ro_bootcheck fix.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
> Look at that: (updating initrd, duplicates the content of the cryptroot
> config file...)
right cryptsetup should maybe not write into /etc/i-t/conf.d
but in /usr/share/i-t/conf.d but those could also be mounted ro?!?
anyway i'd like to hear from cryptsetup maintainers before reassgning.
the
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 23:47:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: seems not to build usable initrd, even
with MODULES=most in initramfs.conf boot fails (xfs)
has caused the Debian Bug report #484824,
regarding initramfs-tools: seems not to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 483431 pending
Bug#483431: please include drivers for OLPC MMC controller
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 465760 - patch
Bug#465760: initramfs-tools: Needs to create
/lib/modules/${version}/modules.dep in initramfs in case no modules are required
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patc
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 23:42:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: initramfs invalid libs
has caused the Debian Bug report #477054,
regarding initramfs invalid libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 485034 moreinfo
Bug#485034: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but no network with WEP
and AR5211
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> retitle 485034 linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but no network with
> WEP and AR5211
Bug#485034: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686: ath5k associates but no network
Changed Bug titl
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can you please try out 2.6.26-rc8, see trunk apt lines
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
Will do, as soon as it creeps into sid.
> it should have newer ath5k driver.
> also trying an dhcp setup would be cool.
No, DHCP didn't help. However, on t
can you still reproduce that with an uptodate kernel
at best 2.6.25? it has newer ipv6 with more features and fixes?
thanks for feedback
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can we have an update on current linux images.
2.6.24 or better 2.6.25?
thanks
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> running linux-image-2.6.24-1-iop32x on that machine now
> (armel architecture) and the bug is definitely still there.
please checkout current 2.6.25 unstable linux images
or even better 2.6.26-rc8 trunk snapshots see apt lines
-> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
and report back on those, if
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:57:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: bnx2 driver not included
has caused the Debian Bug report #471377,
regarding bnx2 driver not included
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 411839 moreinfo
Bug#411839: linux-2.6: IPv6 PMTU table not garbage collected?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:33:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Prevents ALSA from
finding soundcards
has caused the Debian Bug report #406828,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-amd64: fails to load acpi/processer and
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:33:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Prevents ALSA from
finding soundcards
has caused the Debian Bug report #399691,
regarding linux-modules-2.6.18-2-xen-686: b44 module does not work
to be ma
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:33:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Prevents ALSA from
finding soundcards
has caused the Debian Bug report #415740,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver-amd64: DHCP does not work well o
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:33:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Prevents ALSA from
finding soundcards
has caused the Debian Bug report #415859,
regarding xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Prevents ALSA from finding
so
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:33:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Prevents ALSA from
finding soundcards
has caused the Debian Bug report #405140,
regarding linux-2.6 - xen images does not support frequency scaling
to be m
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:33:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Prevents ALSA from
finding soundcards
has caused the Debian Bug report #399981,
regarding Oops related to link failure in Xen kernel
to be marked as done.
> This card used to work with previous kernels.
sorry for late reply.
could you test up to date kernels aka 2.6.25 or even better 2.6.26-rc8?
so that we can see if that bug still exists and upstream needs
to be notified.
thanks for feedback.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> tags 401281 moreinfo
Bug#401281: Xorg shows black/garbled screen
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:47:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: general protection fault from
powernow-k8
has caused the Debian Bug report #415239,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: general protection fault from powernow-k
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:48:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: savage drm does not work
has caused the Debian Bug report #403217,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: savage drm does not work
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:51:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-2-686: loading nvidiafb module freezes
system
has caused the Debian Bug report #398258,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-2-686: loading nvidiafb module freezes system
to be ma
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:50:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: kobject_add failed for audio with -EEXIST
has caused the Debian Bug report #401163,
regarding kobject_add failed for audio with -EEXIST
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:42:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-2.6: e1000 panics on parisc
has caused the Debian Bug report #414044,
regarding linux-2.6: e1000 panics on parisc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:49:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-3-powerpc64: /dev/rtc not available
has caused the Debian Bug report #404101,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-3-powerpc64: /dev/rtc not available
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:40:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Loading of speedstep_centrino
and cpufreq fails on hp nc4200
has caused the Debian Bug report #413743,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Loading of speedstep_cent
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:49:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: Can't access /dev/rtc
has caused the Debian Bug report #402823,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: Can't access /dev/rtc
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:33:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686: Prevents ALSA from
finding soundcards
has caused the Debian Bug report #407410,
regarding BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#2!
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:39:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: pl2303 regression
has caused the Debian Bug report #413265,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: pl2303 regression
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:34:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line RE: linux-image-2.6.18-3-vserver-amd64: strange error messages
and sporadic md-raid failures with sata_promise
has caused the Debian Bug report #404478,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-3-vserver-am
[ please just cc the bug report, this is *not* a private thread, thanks ]
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008, Juergen Pfennig wrote:
> On Sun 29.06.2008, you wrote:
> > how is 2.6.25 doing?
> > linux images from unstable just install fine in testing.
> >
> > thanks for feedback
>
> Problems with AMD-690 and US
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Marcello Nuccio wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> Version: 2.6.25-4
> Followup-For: Bug #482074
>
> same problem after the upgrade from 2.6.25-3.
> 2.6.24-* works fine.
>
> Marcello Nuccio
could you please try 2.6.26-rc8 linux images,
see apt trunk lines
-> http:
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> Version: 2.6.25-4
> Severity: normal
>
> I just installed linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 to try and take advantage of
> the new ath5k driver. My /etc/network/interfaces file says:
>
> auto ath0
> iface ath0 inet stat
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008, Jaime Alberto Silva wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.24-7
> Severity: normal
> File: /lib/modules/2.6.24-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse.ko
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> As noticed in bug report #452752
> (http://b
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:21:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-amd64: It's not possible to load
the processor module because pm_idle isn't exported.
has caused the Debian Bug report #480900,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-am
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:17:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-vserver-amd64 is missing vroot support
has caused the Debian Bug report #481926,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-6-vserver-amd64 is missing vroot support
to be marked as don
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:14:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: rfkill switch doesn't work
with iwl4965 driver
has caused the Debian Bug report #482337,
regarding linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: rfkill switch doesn't work with iwl
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:15:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: CIFS module will create symlinks, but not delete them
has caused the Debian Bug report #482083,
regarding CIFS module will create symlinks, but not delete them
to be marked as done.
This mea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 485375 + pending
Bug#485375: gdb: error cannot read floating-point and SSE registers
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 485609 + pending
Bug#485609: modules.pcimap lists both pata_sis and sis5513 for [1039:5513]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:55:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: dmesg spam: ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [c18e0dec]
'on'
has caused the Debian Bug report #420678,
regarding dmesg spam: ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [c18e0dec] 'on'
to be mark
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:51:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line re: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: Belkin F5D7050 v.4002 wireless
USB adapter fails to communicate.
has caused the Debian Bug report #442419,
regarding linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: Belkin F5D7050 v.4002
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:52:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686: Unable to connect with VPNC from
HOME LAN
has caused the Debian Bug report #439520,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-5-686: Unable to connect with VPNC from HOME LAN
to
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:50:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686: PAE breaks Pentium-M CPUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #410480,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686: PAE breaks Pentium-M CPUs
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:44:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-source-2.6.18-3 problem
has caused the Debian Bug report #396879,
regarding linux-source-2.6.18-3 problem
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:45:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: image built from linux-source-2..6.21 can not be booted up
has caused the Debian Bug report #430393,
regarding image built from linux-source-2..6.21 can not be booted up
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:48:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown-block
has caused the Debian Bug report #438594,
regarding VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown-block
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 15:07 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain. Xen 3.0 doesn't
even try (xe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 489186 initramfs-tools
Bug#489186: mention UUID
Bug reassigned from package `grub-doc' to `initramfs-tools'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
[ quick private reply, on the jump too ]
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 03:43:14PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> I set a build going this morning with them enabled. Hopefully I'll get a
> chance to test the result over the next few days, but I'm away for some
> of the weekend, so...
thanks - no rush.
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 15:07 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> >> Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain. Xen 3.0 doesn't
> >> even try (xend.log):
> >
> > The patches to support save/r
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 14:07 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 01:01:17PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > > Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain. Xen 3.0 doesn't
> > > even try (xend.log):
> >
> > The
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 03:07:03PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> >> Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain. Xen 3.0 doesn't
> >> even try (xend.log):
> >
> > The patches to support
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 01:01:17PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> >> > Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain.
Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain. Xen 3.0 doesn't
>> even try (xend.log):
>
> The patches to support save/restore on pvops kernel's are queued for
> 2.6.27.
Ah, thanks. And wh
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 01:01:17PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> > Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain. Xen 3.0 doesn't
>> > even try (xend.log):
>>
>> The patches to support
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 01:01:17PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain. Xen 3.0 doesn't
> > even try (xend.log):
>
> The patches to support save/restore on pvops kernel's are queued for
> 2.6.2
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:43 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Yes. Unfortunately I still can't save this domain. Xen 3.0 doesn't
> even try (xend.log):
The patches to support save/restore on pvops kernel's are queued for
2.6.27.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Rollins Band - Move Right In / Ho
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:29:39AM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> This appears to have been seen a couple of times before:
>>> http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=8416&msgid=http://mid.gmane.org/[E
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:29:39AM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This appears to have been seen a couple of times before:
> > http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=8416&msgid=http://mid.gmane.org/[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]
> > and
> > http://bugzilla.xe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 488284 + pending
Bug#488284: linux-image-2.6.25-2-xen-686: kernel BUG at
arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c:241
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping p
Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This appears to have been seen a couple of times before:
> http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=8416&msgid=http://mid.gmane.org/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> and
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1248
>
> in particular the later sugges
[ please keep bug report on cc, thanks ]
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Juergen Pfennig wrote:
> On Sun 29.06.2008, you wrote:
> > how is 2.6.25 doing?
> > linux images from unstable just install fine in testing.
> >
> > thanks for feedback
>
> Thanks, I will try that kernel and send you some feedback. Tw
On Sun 29.06.2008, you wrote:
> how is 2.6.25 doing?
> linux images from unstable just install fine in testing.
>
> thanks for feedback
Thanks, I will try that kernel and send you some feedback. Two remarks (1) I
learned that the current low-cost SD-media with MLC are too slow to resonably
run L
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:15:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#488678: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: Boot fails: no tty
has caused the Debian Bug report #488678,
regarding linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: Boot fails: no tty
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: kernel
Severity: normal
Hi,
here is a scenario to illustrate the problem:
- run low priority processes with a 19 nice value (for example
distributed-net aka dnetc) under the identity of a specific user
(daemon)
- run a normal priority process under the identity of a another user
(for
88 matches
Mail list logo
