Re: RFC: DKMS - Dynamic Kernel Module Support

@debian-kernel: please see the full thread at On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:00:00 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, Hi Raphael, > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, David Paleino wrote: > > Hello *, > > some time ago I filed a RFS [1] for DKMS [2], and

Bug#498645: initramfs-tools: Boot takes three minutes to finish (!)

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > > To summarize: No matter how faulty my hardware might be (the boot > > never took so long with etch), I don't think it is reasonable at all > > that a user has to do this in order for the boot process not to take > > more than three minutes. > > >

Bug#498691: 2.6.26-1-686 (2.6.26-5) not boot

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26-5 When the system boot, I have the following error: /scripts/init-premount/udev: line 17: udevd: not found done. Begin: Mounting root file system ... Begin: Running /scripts/local-top...done /init: line 1: udevadm: not found Begin: Waiting for roo

Bug#498698: initramfs-tools - Does not longer add zfcp module

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.92i Severity: grave i-t does not longer add the zfcp module, which is located in drivers/s390/scsi. Bastian -- In the strict scientific sense we all feed on death -- even vegetarians. -- Spock, "Wolf in the Fold", stardate 3615.4 -- To UNS

Bug#498691: 2.6.26-1-686 (2.6.26-5) not boot

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:01:49PM +0200, Lorenzo Vanoni wrote: > When the system boot, I have the following error: > /scripts/init-premount/udev: line 17: udevd: not found > done. > Begin: Mounting root file system ... Begin: Running > /scripts/local-top...done > /init: line 1: udevadm: not found

Bug#498698: initramfs-tools - Does not longer add zfcp module

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.92i > Severity: grave > > i-t does not longer add the zfcp module, which is located in > drivers/s390/scsi. right, happened with switch to copy_modules_dir kernel/drivers/scsi for 0.86. will fi

Bug#498702: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: SATA DVD drive recognized in 2.6.25-2 but not in 2.6.26-1

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26-4 Severity: important My Sony CD-RW/DVD-ROM CRX310S was working file until apt-get upgraded the kernel from 2.6.25-2 to 2.6.26-1 (Debian testing). The mount-point /dev/scd0 I was using has completely disappeared; this excerpt from dmesg seems highl

Bug#494144: Checking versions of the symbols in modules

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:12:53PM +0200, Jordi Pujol wrote: > nevertheless consider activating the config option to force loading of > modules, Yeah, looks like the easiest solution. > so that the Debian kernel complies with the guidelines of operation > following: This is not longer

Bug#496903: crash on 6710b lid closure

Here's what we get with linux-image-2.6.26-1-686_2.6.26-5_i386: [ 9188.477222] BUG: unable to handle kernel <1>BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 3022 [ 9188.477395] IP: [<3022>] [ 9188.477451] *pde = [ 9188.477505] Oops: [#1] SMP [ 9188.477576] Modules linked

Processed: #496903 also found in 2.6.26-5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 496903 2.6.26-5 Bug#496903: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: crashes when 6710b lid closed Bug marked as found in version 2.6.26-5. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#498645: initramfs-tools: Boot takes three minutes to finish (!)

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > this looks more like a kernel bug, One detail I've just noticed: After the boot, the eject button of /dev/hdc does not work at all. This didn't happen with etch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#498698: initramfs-tools - Does not longer add zfcp module

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 01:34:56PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > will fix before dinstall run and wait if you find another fallout. No failout, but addition of dasd_diag_mod would be fine (even if it is currently not usable without another scrupt). Bastian -- Love sometimes expresses itself

Processed: Re: Bug#498645: initramfs-tools: Boot takes three minutes to finish (!)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 498645 linux-2.6 Bug#498645: initramfs-tools: Boot takes three minutes to finish (!) Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `linux-2.6'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#498645: initramfs-tools: Boot takes three minutes to finish (!)

reassign 498645 linux-2.6 stop On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > > > this looks more like a kernel bug, > > One detail I've just noticed: After the boot, the eject button of /dev/hdc > does not work at all. This didn'

Processed: fix title

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 498712 Document config options are overriden via > /etc/mkinitramfs/conf.d Bug#498712: Please mention Changed Bug title to `Document config options are overriden via /etc/mkinitramfs/conf.d' from `Please mention'. > -- Stopping processing her

Bug#498712: Please mention

Package: initramfs-tools Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please mention in initramfs.conf that the values specified there can be overriden via /etc/mkinitramfs/conf.d. This is important since d-i will now use /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy to set MODULES. How about: --- initramfs.conf

Bug#498698: initramfs-tools - Does not longer add zfcp module

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:40:20PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 01:34:56PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > will fix before dinstall run and wait if you find another fallout. > > No failout, but addition of dasd_diag_mod would be fine (even if it is > currently not usab

Bug#498645: initramfs-tools: Boot takes three minutes to finish (!)

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > reassign 498645 linux-2.6 > stop > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > > > > > this looks more like a kernel bug, > > > > One detail I've just noticed: After the boot

Bug#498645: initramfs-tools: Boot takes three minutes to finish (!)

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 04:19:24PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-22etch2 works ok > linux-image-2.6.20-1-686 version 2.6.20-3 does not work > linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 version 2.6.26-5 does not work > > [ The 2.6.20 image w

Re: 2.6.26-5 vs m68k atari abi

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:36:17PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:02:01PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 03:45:13PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:56:21AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > It looks like th

Bug#498724: ALSA: snd-hda-intel: no working master and unmutable pcm channel

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26-4 Severity: normal When I run alsamixer, I can see a master channel, but it has no volume slider. It's possible to mute the master but it has no effect (sound keeps playing). The PCM channel does control the volume, but it is not mutable (the m ke

Bug#402946: current status

Bug was introduced as kernel #9397 (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9397) on 2007-11-16 10:53 At least kernel 2.6.26.3 from kernel.org works again, thus the bug was resolved. Debian Kernel 2.6.24-1-686 still has the bug. The actual default testing kernel 2.6.26-1 does not have sata_si

Bug#498727: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: laptop multimedia buttons generate scancodes but don't get mapped to keycodes

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26-4 Severity: normal On a Fujitsu Siemens Amilo Pi 1505 laptop, the multimedia buttons don't work correctly. The mute button generates a keycode, but the volume up/down don't, and neither does the 'information' button, which usually brings up a we

initramfs-tools 0.92i MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.92g Current version: 0.92i -- This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is responsible. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watc

Bug#498727: extra information

After thinking a little longer about the problem, I'm not sure if this is an X problem or a kernel problem. 'xev' doesn't show anything when hitting the volume buttons, but showkey does give some output... I'm not really familiar about how this low-level thing works to know if it's X or kernel's fa

Bug#498472: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686: does not boot under Etch Xen)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:44:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#498472: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686: does not boot under Etch Xen has caused the Debian Bug report #498472, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686: does not boot under Etch Xen to be m

linux-2.6.26-5 IPv6 route rt6_fill_node

I am getting this error from linux-2.6.26-5. net/ipv6/route.c: In function 'rt6_fill_node': net/ipv6/route.c:2186: error: too few arguments to function 'ipv6_dev_get_saddr' make[3]: *** [net/ipv6/route.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [net/ipv6] Error 2 make[1]: *** [net] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory

Bug#498472: linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686: does not boot under Etch Xen

Hi Ian, I upgraded to the 3.2 hypervisor from Backports.org, and that indeed works perfectly. You can close this bug. Special thanks (to the team) for the suspend and the D-I support! I seem to recall that I read somewhere a description of Xen support in Lenny. It stated the lack of dom0 suppo

Bug#497971: 2 more things

Hi, I can confirm that on a ThinkPad X60s and would like do add two things: 1.) This is actually a regression from 2.6.25 (tested with package version 2.6.25-7), which had channels 12 and 13 available. This can be quite confusing in case you are used to associate to an AP on one of these channels

Bug#498735: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: SATA HD is not detected on SiS 965

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Current 2.6.26 kernels in Debian don't define the CONFIG_SATA_SIS option in the kernel configuration, making it not build the sata_sis.ko module. This renders systems that boot from SATA HDs on non-AHCI S

Bug#498735: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: SATA HD is not detected on SiS 965)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:39:41 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#498735: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: SATA HD is not detected on SiS 965 has caused the Debian Bug report #498735, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: SATA HD is not detected on SiS 965

Bug#498735: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: SATA HD is not detected on SiS 965)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:02:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#498735: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: SATA HD is not detected on SiS 965 has caused the Debian Bug report #498735, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: SATA HD is not detected on SiS 965

Bug#497505: virtualbox-ose doesn't work with linux 2.6.26

I've taken a look at the upstream SVN repository and it looks like the fix is in changeset 12305 [1]. There are differences between the code there and the source in Debian. That changeset seems to e.g. depend on changeset 12299 [2]. I have not looked much deeper, but at first glance it looks lik

Processed: Re: Bug#497505: virtualbox-ose doesn't work with linux 2.6.26

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # No longer assign to linux-2.6 as the issue has been confirmed for VBox > reassign 497505 virtualbox-ose 1.6.2-dfsg-4 Bug#497505: virtualbox-ose doesn't work with linux 2.6.26 Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6,virtualbox-ose' to `virtualbox-ose'.

Bug#497505: virtualbox-ose doesn't work with linux 2.6.26

# No longer assign to linux-2.6 as the issue has been confirmed for VBox reassign 497505 virtualbox-ose 1.6.2-dfsg-4 tags 497505 patch fixed-upstream thanks On Friday 12 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > I've taken a look at the upstream SVN repository and it looks like the > fix is in changeset

Bug#498013: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#498013: [linux-2.6] Syslog reports Error: Driver 'pcspkr' is already registered, aborting...)

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:09:03 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the linux-2.6 package: > > #498013: [linux-2.6] Syslog reports Error: Driver 'pcspkr' is already > registered, aborti