Package: firmware-ralink
When downloading firmware files directly form ralink website
(http://www.ralinktech.com/ralink/Home/Support/Linux.html)
there is a license file included (file attached), which has
to be included everytime firmware is redistributed.
Not sure if this is also true for
Your message dated Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:15:56 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#501107: firmware-ralink: missing license file
has caused the Debian Bug report #501107,
regarding firmware-ralink: missing license file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-5
Severity: important
Several attempts to boot into a newly installed linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
resulted in a
screen full of mostly hex gibberish followed by kernel panic.
I would be happy to type in that whole screen of hex if anyone is
Your message dated Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:29:09 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#501079: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Huge Memory leak in
Debian running 2.6.28-1-686
has caused the Debian Bug report #501079,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Huge Memory leak in Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 500992 linux-image-2.6-686
Bug#500992: hylafax-server: hylafax and ELSA USB 56k: modem crashes remaining
on-hook
Bug reassigned from package `hylafax-server' to `linux-image-2.6-686'.
retitle 500992 Communication with USB-Modem (cdc-acm)
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.26+16
Followup-For: Bug #500992
This one is only to provide information about the afffected hardware in a
well known format.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
I am going to flood the system with more debugging information :-\
Sebastian Niehaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am now sure it is *not* a hylafay problem but a kernel problem. When
I booted the box with the 2.6.18 Kernel (Etch) Hylafax worked fine.
Since I have two USB controller I tried
Hi folks
linux-modules-*-2.6 also produces a source-availability problem, they
use source including binary packages from unstable to build binary
packages. In unstable this is usualy no problem as we ship the source in
at least one variant. For the packages in testing this can be a problem,
Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
linux-modules-*-2.6 also produces a source-availability problem, they
use source including binary packages from unstable to build binary
packages. In unstable this is usualy no problem as we ship the source in
at least one variant. For the packages in testing
dann frazier wrote:
hey,
I've just uploaded firmware-nonfree 0.13. It resolves 2 RC bugs:
494936 - bnx2 fails to load on bootup, succeeds on manul load
500692 - FTBFS: depends on linux-support-2.6.25-2
And one 'normal' one (that should be bumped to important, imo):
494703 - iwl3945:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:58:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
For a short-term fix I only see three solutions:
- Continue to upload to unstable, drop virtualbox modules.
- Upload to testing-proposed-updates.
- Let virtualbox-ose into Lenny.
None of these look really
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-486
Version: ?
Hello,
I have an extra-ordinary problem or perhaps an Kernel bug:
My Server:
* Debian Etch (Kernel: Etch-n-half), Samba 3.0.24
* 500gb harddisk with a system and a data partition. Both are crypted
with Luks
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 02:58:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
For a short-term fix I only see three solutions:
- Continue to upload to unstable, drop virtualbox modules.
- Upload to testing-proposed-updates.
- Let virtualbox-ose
Luk Claes wrote:
t-p-u is not the best alternative IMHO, we're not talking about some
package (linux-modules-*2.6) we can easily take out of the release if it
breaks without harming lots of users...
ack.
Either we remove virtualbox-ose from the release or we accept the
version in unstable
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:38:22AM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote:
Hi,
I confirm this bug. Upgrading from 2.6.25-2 to 2.6.26-1 caused kacpi
and kacpi_notify processes to use more tha 75% of my CPU. My laptop is a
Dell Precision M70.
I made more tests with version 2.6.26-7 of
Hi
Can you please provide a proposed text (license: GPL v2) about the issue
mentioned in bug #479709 for inclusion in the release notes?
Thanks already.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
t-p-u is not the best alternative IMHO, we're not talking about some
package (linux-modules-*2.6) we can easily take out of the release if it
breaks without harming lots of users...
ack.
Either we remove virtualbox-ose from the release or we accept
At least on Asus Eeepc 701, the SD card reader seems not a true SDHC reader.
But it works with the default OS.
It even has worked on mine two times, I don't know why it suddenly breaks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Il lunedì 29 settembre 2008 18:48:45 Salvo Isaja ha scritto:
For a couple of days I run my network connection over cable instead
of using the USB dongle. It seems that the system is much stabler
without the rt73usb module: I'm able to run 2.6.26 for much longer
time, but it may be a
Michael Meskes wrote:
it was stupid to upload 1.6.6 to unstable, however, the the only sane
Which of course is easy to say in hindsight. I do not remember seeing a
similar
statement before the upload.
how suprising is that when the upload was made by patrick without prior
it was stupid to upload 1.6.6 to unstable, however, the the only sane
Which of course is easy to say in hindsight. I do not remember seeing a similar
statement before the upload.
Besides I agree that virtualbox-ose 1.6.6 should move into Lenny because
upstream considers this a bugfix release.
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 08:33:01PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
how suprising is that when the upload was made by patrick without prior
discussion/announcement/communication/$whatever on the list.
Right no discussion from noone. So we are all at fault somehow.
however, as indicated already,
On Saturday 04 October 2008, Michael Meskes wrote:
This btw is also the reason why it
was uploaded to sid. After all it fixes some bugs.
for the records: the new upstream version only fixes two bugs: #495028
which is a cosmetic thing and not worth the trouble, and #499623 which
is
Package: tgt
Version: 20070924-1
Severity: Serious
Hello,
this package needs a major update from upstream sources, which unfortunately
are not in releaseable state yet.
Best regards
Frederik Schüler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
drivers/net/starfire_firmware.h (licensed under GPLv2) is entirely composed
of binary firmware, such as:
static const u32 firmware_rx[] = {
0x010003dc, 0x,
0x04000421, 0x0086,
[...]
It's worth noting that the last
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
drivers/net/tehuti_fw.h (licensed under GPLv2+) is entirely composed of
binary firmware, such as:
static u32 s_firmLoad[] = {
0x000f0002,
0x40718000,
[...]
Since this file is licensed under GPL, this could make
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-5
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Intel has a new wireless chipset. Laptops with those chipset are currently
hitting the market, and we can assume they will replace the 3965/4965 soon.
Are there any plan (and any chance) to have them supported in
27 matches
Mail list logo
