Bug#515255: linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-vserver-686: No grub entry's after install of kernel, and when I add it by hand the kernel can't start

2009-02-15 Thread Henrik Dige Semark
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-vserver-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24 Severity: important This is a very big problem for my anyway, I have to use both Xen and Vserver, and the kernel can provide my both, but when I install it, (both amd64 and 686 kernel) it says “Changing

Bug#515261: linux-image-xen-686: missing dependancy to xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686

2009-02-15 Thread Michael Rasmussen
Package: linux-image-xen-686 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system When doing a full-upgrade from etch to lenny on a system running xen the xen hypervisor is not updated accordingly. A dependancy to xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686 is missing which means that grub is

Re: Bug#515255: linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-vserver-686: No grub entry's after install of kernel, and when I add it by hand the kernel can't start

2009-02-15 Thread Michael Rasmussen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi If the system in question is a dom0 you are missing some references to the xen hypervisor. An example entry from my menu.lst title Xen 3.0.3-1-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 root(hd0,0) kernel

Bug#515277: r8169.c: incorrect RX dropped counter

2009-02-15 Thread kronberg . tatiana
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-8 Severity: normal During a network session RX dropped counter shows great numbers. All the other things of the network are fine. The typical value of the counter is of the order of magnitude of 10^9, eg., $ /sbin/ifconfig eth0 | grep RX

Bug#515261: linux-image-xen-686: missing dependancy to xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686

2009-02-15 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 515261 important thanks On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 01:06:38PM +0100, Michael Rasmussen wrote: Justification: breaks the whole system The kernel is the system, so not applicable. When doing a full-upgrade from etch to lenny on a system running xen the xen hypervisor is not updated

Processed: Re: Bug#515261: linux-image-xen-686: missing dependancy to xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686

2009-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 515261 important Bug#515261: linux-image-xen-686: missing dependancy to xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686 Severity set to `important' from `critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Processed: reassign 515073 to linux-2.6, found 515073 in 2.6.26-8

2009-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 reassign 515073 linux-2.6 Bug#515073: linux-image-2.6.26-1-vserver-686: realtek r8139.ko shows erattic packets dropped (changes fast, always) from ifconfig Bug reassigned

Processed: reassign 515277 to linux-2.6, forcibly merging 515073 515277

2009-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 reassign 515277 linux-2.6 Bug#515277: r8169.c: incorrect RX dropped counter Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64' to `linux-2.6'. forcemerge 515073

Bug#514292: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: Bad page state in process 'emacs'

2009-02-15 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:26:41 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: how easily can you reproduce!? if easily please consider to tell bugzilla.kernel.org and let us know the bug number. It is not easy at all: it was the first time I experienced such an error and unfortunately I have not

Re: [PATCH] Do not pass exit code through on pipe failure

2009-02-15 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Kees Cook wrote: Since exit 2 has a special meaning, we must exit 1 when the find/cpio/gzip pipe fails, otherwise update-initramfs will potentially ignore failures (it ignores return code 2 from mkinitramfs). Signed-off-by: Kees Cook k...@debian.org thanks, applied.

Bug#514292: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: Bad page state in process 'emacs'

2009-02-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 07:12:22PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: Hi there! On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:26:41 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: how easily can you reproduce!? if easily please consider to tell bugzilla.kernel.org and let us know the bug

Bug#514292: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: Bad page state in process 'emacs'

2009-02-15 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Jonas! On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:55:55 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 07:12:22PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: I usually upgrade my sid every morning, but I do not reboot every day, since I use a lot s2disk. I will try to keep an eye on my syslog and reboot as soon as I

Re: Problem with CIFS on Lenny?

2009-02-15 Thread Harald Krammer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Harald Krammer schrieb: Ben Hutchings schrieb: On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 14:12 +0100, Harald Krammer wrote: [...] Hello Ben, I did my network configuration with the Debian installer, selected DHCP and nothing more. h...@hkpc:~$ ps axu | grep -i

Bug#357538: marked as done (initramfs-tools: can't boot into new 2.6.15 evms system)

2009-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:53:59 +0100 with message-id 20090215205359.gb24...@stro.at and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: can't boot into new 2.6.15 evms system has caused the Debian Bug report #357538, regarding initramfs-tools: can't boot into new 2.6.15 evms system to be marked

Bug#411284: marked as done (evms_activate complains about missing lib in initramfs)

2009-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:54:55 +0100 with message-id 20090215205455.gc24...@stro.at and subject line re: evms_activate complains about missing lib in initramfs has caused the Debian Bug report #411284, regarding evms_activate complains about missing lib in initramfs to be marked as

Bug#515514: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: combination of kernel amd64 and 6G memory by using a lvm in a software raid creates a kernel panic

2009-02-15 Thread Jochen Becker
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-13 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system by copying data from one software raid device into annother a kernel panic comes up newstorage 2 harddiscs wdc 750 ayps combined with software raid 1 into software raid lvm pv and

Bug#504549: marked as done (initramfs-tools: please add mtd/jffs2/ubifs modules to initrd when 'most' is selected)

2009-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:30:26 -0500 with message-id 20090215173026.44d4f...@ephemeral and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: please add mtd/jffs2/ubifs modules to initrd when has caused the Debian Bug report #504549, regarding initramfs-tools: please add mtd/jffs2/ubifs modules to

Bug#504553: marked as done (initramfs-tools: include framebuffer modules when 'most' is selected)

2009-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:31:56 -0500 with message-id 20090215173156.7382a...@ephemeral and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: include framebuffer modules when 'most' is has caused the Debian Bug report #504553, regarding initramfs-tools: include framebuffer modules when 'most' is

Bug#515533: linux-2.6.26: tulip module handles dmfe cards (again)

2009-02-15 Thread Daniel Hornung
Package: linux-image-2.6-486 Version: 2.6.26+17 Severity: important After upgrading to linux-2.6.26 from 2.6.18, one of my two network cards stopped working. Closer examination showed lots of tulip_stop_rxtx() failed (CSR5 0xfc74 CSR6 0x2042202) messages. It seems that bug #405203

Bug#515533: linux-2.6.26: tulip module handles dmfe cards (again)

2009-02-15 Thread Daniel Hornung
A patch that would probably have fixed this issue on x86 systems seems to have been deferred because the current behaviour seemed to be necessary for sparc64. At least if I interpret these mails correctly: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/86 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/292 signature.asc