On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:29:21PM +, Stephen Marenka wrote:
> m68k: add 2.6.28 patches
This is upstream development. Get the patches into that tree and don't
dump it in the Debian kernel.
Bastian
--
No more blah, blah, blah!
-- Kirk, "Miri", stardate 2713.6
--
To UNSUBSC
* Aurelien Jarno [2009-03-17 00:11]:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24
Would you like to have SVN access to the kernel repo, so you can
commit such changes yourself?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 500645 + pending
Bug#500645: linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz-686: OpenVZ checkpointing does not work
Tags were: fixed-upstream patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message,
Hello,
Sun Microsystems has recently donated a very nice machine to my FOSS
project (http://www.officeshots.org). It has four TI UltraSparc IIIi
processors and 8 GB RAM. At the moment it is running Debian Lenny with
the sparc64-smp kernel.
I want to run multiple virtual machines on it but there a
Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Aurelien Jarno [2009-03-17 00:11]:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24
>
> Would you like to have SVN access to the kernel repo, so you can
> commit such changes yourself?
I actually have commit access, I'll commit the patches. But given it
concerns
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:20:09AM +0100, Sander Marechal wrote:
> I want to run multiple virtual machines on it but there aren't many
> solutions available on sparc64.
To be exact, there are two:
- Sun LDoms
- Linux VServer
> I found one strange thing though. Debi
Hello!
I've two identical Lenovo X200 here, one with Debian Lenny,
one with Debian Squezze.
For some days, all kernels built on the squezze machine
instantly reboot at (about half a second after loaded by grub)
bootup.
I'm using identical version of the kernels (wireless-testing,
linux-2.6, linu
* Aurelien Jarno [2009-03-17 09:27]:
> > Would you like to have SVN access to the kernel repo, so you can
> > commit such changes yourself?
>
> I actually have commit access, I'll commit the patches. But given it
> concerns stable kernels, I prefer to see a bug open, and look for
> comments. Also
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-13
Severity: normal
# ntpdate ptbtime1.ptb.de; while :; do sleep 100; ntpdate ptbtime1.ptb.de; done
17 Mar 10:52:18 ntpdate[29182]: step time server 192.53.103.108 offset
-17.468994 sec
17 Mar 10:52:47 ntpdate[29185]: step time server 192.53.103.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 520034 + pending
Bug#520034: linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 520034 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24
Bug#520034: linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
clone 520034 -1
reassign -1 linux-2.6.24
thanks
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:11:45AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24
> Severity: critical
> Tags: patch
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Uninexistant syscalls on mips/mipsel return -ENOSYS er
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 520034 2.6.26-13
Bug#520034: linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.26-13.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 520100 + pending
Bug#520100: linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch2
> tags 520034 + pending
Bug#520034: linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 520034 -1
Bug#520034: linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
Bug 520034 cloned as bug 520100.
> reassign -1 linux-2.6.24
Bug#520100: linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
Bug reassigned f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 520100 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8
Bug#520100: linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
* timo <2...@famous-timo.de> wrote:
> I have got the following problem: At random X is being closed by force
> and the terminal says «critical temperature reached» and then some high
> number around 150°C. At the next moment the computer turns off. That
> problem occurs with linux 2.6.27 till 2.6.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 514511 linux-2.6
Bug#514511: USB storage doesn't work with Xen
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
maximilian attems wrote:
> for 2.6.29 following interfaces will be unset:
> - SCSI_PROC_FS
> should only be needed by legacy apps, sysfs equiv exists
>
> - PCMCIA_IOCTL
> pcmciautils is even already shipped in etch
>
> - ACPI_PROCFS
> - ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
> - ACPI_PROC_EVENT
> scheduled to
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> * debian/patches/debian/scripts-kconfig-reportoldconfig.patch:
> Use the initial symbol check.
i question the usefullness of aboves patch.
originaly we used oldconfig. the trouble was that notorious arches
would drag behind and not update their confi
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> However, it also has a restriction that you cannot change the 'data='
> parameter with 'remount'. Therefore, you have to pass the correct one
> at initial mount time, even though the data= parameter does not
> directly affect a read-only fs. If you d
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:12:14PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > * debian/patches/debian/scripts-kconfig-reportoldconfig.patch:
> > Use the initial symbol check.
> i question the usefullness of aboves patch.
Please provide a replacement.
> origi
hello chip,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.28-1-686
> Version: 2.6.28-2~snapshot.12850
> Severity: important
>
> I want to debug a firmware problem that kills my 4965 every time I close my
> laptop cover (!). Anyone who runs into a similar problem will ne
Please use an upstream version (0.9.x, current in 0.9.5) from
http://stgt.berlios.de.
This version (tgt/20070924-1) in Debian unstable is terribly old/buggy.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:12:14PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> now there is an upstream silentoldconfig.
>
uups it doesn't what i thought it would.
so this falls under feature request for reportoldconfig
to minimize output to what oldconfig would ask.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
> > initramfs-tools should not pick up data= from /etc/fstab, but it does
> > not.
[maximilian attems]
> too many negations in one line, what are you trying to say?
Yes, I meant to say: initramfs-tools should pick up data= from
/etc/fstab, but it does not.
> > The workaround is 'rootflags=data
Hi,
* dann frazier [2009-02-09 15:58:28-0700]:
>
> I'm transferring a build w/ the fix backported to the lenny kernel to
> here:
> http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/514624/
>
> If one or both of you could verify that it resolves the issue for you
> as well, it'd be appreciated.
>
Tested a
I am no longer using the kernel version which this bug report was filed
against.
I have upgraded to a 2.6.28 kernel (built from the source packages in
sid) and have almost 4 days of uptime without a system lockup.
--
Steve Kostecke
Public Key at gopher://kostecke.net or `finger st...@kostecke.n
Package: linux-headers-2.6.28-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.28-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package cannot be installed because it depends on linux-kbuild-2.6.28
which does not exist.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
hey,
We have a kernel security update prepared for lenny that contains a
significant amount of arch-specific code changes. We are looking for
pre-release testers - particularly those running alpha, mips, sparc
and s390 gear.
I've staged the upload here:
deb http://kernel.debian.net/debian lenny
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-rc8-powerpc
Version: 2.6.29~rc8-1~experimental.1~snapshot.13144
Followup-For: Bug #518231
Hi,
I get the same error like Jordy.
How can this be fixed?
Kind regards,
Marko
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unsta
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93
Severity: important
I've got armel with rootfs at /dev/mmcblk0p3.
initramfs failes to create initrd image for kernel:
# LANG=C dpkg --configure -a
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.93) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Processing trigger
33 matches
Mail list logo
