Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.2
Severity: normal
You should not use dpkg --print-installation-architecture otherwise you
will quickly get annoying warnings with dpkg 1.15.1:
Paramétrage de linux-image-2.6.29-2-amd64 (2.6.29-5) ...
Running depmod.
Running update-initramfs.
update-initramf
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-15lenny2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After security upgrading linux-image-2.6.26-2-686, system no booting with
options selinux=1 in to
/boot/grub/menu.lst. I'm get message Kernel panic.
Kernel linux-image-2.6.26-2-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 529261 important
Bug#529261: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: kernel panic with option selinux=1 in to
grub/menu.lst
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
I'm having the same issue as being discussed in this thread with
installation of a new Dell R610.
i686 installation detects disks properly (output of lsmod attached).
amd64 installation doesn't detect disks so I'm unable to install. Output
seen in dmesg includes the line:
mptbase: ioc0: Error - :
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 529222 pending
Bug#529222: initramfs-tools: Should not use obsolete dpkg
--print-installation-architecture
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
tags 529222 pending
stop
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.2
> Severity: normal
>
> You should not use dpkg --print-installation-architecture otherwise you
> will quickly get annoying warnings with dpkg 1.15.1:
>
> Paramétrage de linux-image-
Matthias> could you test the patch from
Matthias> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg96700.html and follow
Matthias> up with information if that fixes your problem?
It seems to fix it (2 days of fetchmail, no MSG_PEEK warnings yet).
--
Ian Zimmerman
gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD
fingerpr
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem
Version: 2.6.26-15
Hello,
The Linux kernel sources upon which
linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem is based are suffering from a
bug, which only affects the (relatively rare) "summit" SMP
architecture. It is found in IBM xSeries servers such as the
x440 or x44
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for linux-2.6.
CVE-2007-6514[0]:
| Apache HTTP Server, when running on Linux with a document root on a
| Windows share mounted using smbfs, allows remote attackers to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 529326 patch
Bug#529326: linux-2.6: CVE-2009-0787 information disclosure in ecryptfs
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-15lenny2
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for linux-2.6.
CVE-2009-0787[0]:
| The ecryptfs_write_metadata_to_contents function in the eCryptfs
| functionality in the Linux kernel 2.6.2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> tags 529165 + pending
Bug#529165: OOPS in bridging code
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
tag 529326 patch
thank you
note that this affects the lenny and squeeze versions of the kernel
(2.6.26). even though the kernel changelog says that this problem only
affects 2.6.28, it actually affects any version before 2.6.28.9 that has
ecryptfs.
patches are available here:
http://git.kernel.o
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.26-15lenny2
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
>
> The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for linux-2.6.
>
> CVE-2009-0787[0]:
> | The ecryptfs_w
On Mon, 18 May 2009 11:52:04 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.26-15lenny2
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) i
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 02:20:20PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 11:52:04 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> > > Package: linux-2.6
> > > Version: 2.6.26-15lenny2
> > > Severity: important
> > > Tags: securit
The latest kernel update, revision 2.6.26-15lenny2, still does not
contain the fix for this problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26
Severity: important
Tags: security patch
Hi,
The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for linux-2.6.
CVE-2009-1360[0]:
| The __inet6_check_established function in net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
| in the Linux kernel before 2.6.29, wh
Your message dated Mon, 18 May 2009 15:49:45 -0400
with message-id <20090518154945.67a6100f.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#529326: linux-2.6: CVE-2009-0787 information
disclosure in ecryptfs
has caused the Debian Bug report #529326,
regarding linux-2.6: CVE-2009-0787 inform
Your message dated Mon, 18 May 2009 16:05:46 -0400
with message-id <20090518160546.84ef916f.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: linux-2.6: ipv6 potential denial-of-service
has caused the Debian Bug report #529342,
regarding linux-2.6: ipv6 potential denial-of-service
to be marked as
I see something similar:
$ uname -a
Linux box 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 26 01:08:11 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
(Debian sid)
[ 4655.526396] cdrom: This disc doesn't have any tracks I recognize!
[ 4655.577404] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 4655.577404] hda: rw=0, want=68, limit=4
[ 4655.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:18:38PM -0400, STEPHEN POWELL wrote:
> The latest kernel update, revision 2.6.26-15lenny2, still does not
> contain the fix for this problem.
Yes, 15lenny2 was a security update. This fix is queued for 2.6.26-16
which should be included in Debian 5.0.2.
--
dann frazier
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:15:59PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.26
> Severity: important
> Tags: security patch
>
> Hi,
>
> The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for linux-2.6.
>
> CVE-2009-1360[0]:
> | The __inet6_check
Hi,
* dann frazier [2009-05-18 23:19]:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 02:20:20PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 May 2009 11:52:04 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
[...]
> > > This issue supposedly only affected 2.6.28
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> tags 529312 + pending
Bug#529312: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem: Does not recognize all CPUs on
"summit" SMP machines
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
En
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:11:41PM +0200, Andreas U. Trottmann wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem
> Version: 2.6.26-15
>
> Hello,
>
> The Linux kernel sources upon which
> linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem is based are suffering from a
> bug, which only affects the (relatively rare)
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9.dsc
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9_all.deb
linux-pat
Accepted:
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9.diff.gz
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux
Your message dated Tue, 19 May 2009 01:54:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#520100: fixed in linux-2.6.24 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #520100,
regarding linux-2.6: inexistant syscalls return wrong errno on mips/mipsel
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
29 matches
Mail list logo
