Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> tags 535354 + pending
Bug#535354: linux-image-2.6.30-1-powerpc: PowerPC RTC Device needs kernel
configuration change to work
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End
Hello, I have the below System Engineer position available. This is a
contract role with Siemens and does not include relocation or interviewing
costs. This position is expected to have a duration of 3 months.
Are you interested in contract roles?
W2 Pay Rate: $30.00hour without benefi
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The powerpc RTC support has changed to use RTC_DEV_GENERIC, rather than
the RTC_DEV_PPC option in 2.6.29 and below. The configuration needs to
be updated to use RTC_DEV_GENERIC, indeed, the RTC_DEV_PPC option
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-17
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have problem with this kernel on my home computer. Kernel doesn't
start with message:
invalid compressed format (err=1)
I don't know what can I do with this error. :-( I am using 2.6.30-1-686
kernel instead and before so
Package: openais
Severity: wishlist
The current version is 0.97. Would be nice to have this packaged for
rhcs 3. I have packages here already which I could just upload to
expermental. The depend on corosync which is waiting in new.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-re
FYI: The status of the firmware-nonfree source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.16
Current version: 0.17
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-17
Hello,
after installing linux image the lilo is not being called, which results
into system not being bootable after upgrade. I've tried without
kernel-img.conf also with it, containing "do_bootloader = Yes", nothing
helped.
If lilo isn't supp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 535249 - security
Bug#535249: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: fails to work when hda is rerouted to
hde
Tags were: security
Bug#535166: security.debian.org: fails to upgrade the kernel, when the kernel
lies on hde
Tags removed: security
> thank
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:26:00AM +, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> Author: maks
> Date: Wed Jul 1 09:25:58 2009
> New Revision: 13859
>
> Log:
> revert wording of firmware-linux
wow... just reverting w/o discussing w/ the committer? That's a bit
rude.
> packaging details have no place in long
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:30:42AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> And why is it a bug in the kernel if an external module fails to load?
The bug is declaring support for an unsupported device.
> Please show the following information:
Will do when I'm back at that machine.
> > Autoload work
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:08:57 +0200
with message-id <20090701130857.ga31...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#535286: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-686: The package is not
instalable
has caused the Debian Bug report #535286,
regarding linux-headers-2.6.26-2-686: The package
Hi.
After a "dist-upgrade" with aptitude, the problem magically disappeared.
[I could neither do a "safe-upgrade" nor an "upgrade" because of one conflict
which those 2 actions wouldn't resolve...]
Best,
Gilles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-686
Severity: normal
I seguenti pacchetti hanno dipendenze non soddisfatte:
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-686: Dipende: linux-kbuild-2.6.26 che è un pacchetto
virtuale.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unst
Le Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:48:03 +,
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) a écrit :
> Differences are no bug, but usually bugfixes.
>
> Bastian
Le Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:17:54 +0100,
Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> libata is a library module, not a driver. Please explain what the
> actu
I can confirm this behaviour. The machine just freezes when i try to
save it and has to be destroyed to get it back.
This happens to a Debian Lenny x86 DomU with 2.6.26-2-xen running on top
of a x86_64 Ubuntu Hardy Dom0 (2.6.24-24-xen), so i guess this isn't a
Debian specific issue but a general
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: normal
Hi.
The consequence of this problem seems similar to the report #532861.
My current kernel (2.6.26-1) behaves fine, while following an upgrade,
the newly installed is stuck just after printing "Waiting for root [...]".
The r
retitle 535241 screen remains off after suspend on Dell Latitude E6400
thanks
On 2009-07-01 03:41:39 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2009-07-01 03:26:00 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On my Dell Latitude E6400, suspend to disk fails to resume: the screen
> > remains off and the network (Ethe
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:44:18AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:27:59AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > modprobe will load them both, regardless of whether probe succeeds or
> > fails. That is, if they have both been indexed by depmod.
> I just tried, and no, the "wl" m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> tags 532207 + pending
Bug#532207: /iwlwifi-5000-ucode-8.24.2.12 available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 535241 screen remains off after suspend on Dell Latitude E6400
Bug#535241: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: suspend to disk fails to resume on Dell
Latitude E6400
Changed Bug title to `screen remains off after suspend on Dell Latitude E6400'
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:16:16 +0200
with message-id <20090701091616.ga28...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#531328: firmware-linux: Description should state that
it's just related to Debian's kernel images
has caused the Debian Bug report #531328,
regarding firmware-linux: Descrip
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:27:59AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> modprobe will load them both, regardless of whether probe succeeds or
> fails. That is, if they have both been indexed by depmod.
I just tried, and no, the "wl" module is not autoloaded even after
rerunning depmod -a explicitl
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 21:15 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:03:18PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > > Sure that this is actually communicated to userspace? It appears that the
> > > module is still loaded, with no devices bound.
>
> > In Linux 2.6 probe failure
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 535249 linux-2.6
Bug#535249: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: fails to work when hda is rerouted to
hde
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64' to `linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 535166 535249
Bug#535166: security.debian.org: fail
24 matches
Mail list logo